Eh? I didn't say that, and I don't think anyone else did, either...I just meant that assuming the end of a calendar must be the end of the world is similar to assuming the Y2K bug would end the world, instead of just messing up some computer systems. Y2K was a real problem which was, like most other real problems, wildly exaggerated (some are wildly ignored).asiepshtain said:Whats with all the Y2K is a conspiracy bull?
Y2K wasn't some fabrication, it was a computer bug that could have been very distructive, espically in old banking systems ( my uncle made a fortune fixing those). It was addressed and fixed. If it would have been ignored very bad things would have happened to your money.
And thats just in banks where I can vouch for.
The fact that the media kept fuelling the fire after most of the major systems were fixed and that the public went a little hysterical is a diffrent matter.
The 2012 thing is the most extreme example of wild exaggeration I know of: something that would only be a problem if the Mayans still existed somehow turning into the apocalypse.