*shoots you in the back of the head and drags you away* I'm sorry it had to be this way, but you where sticking your nose in the wrong business, pal.Monshroud said:
40% of Tweets are pointless babble
- Thread starter MatParker116
- Start date
Recommended Videos
Seeing how about 8/10 posts (even on here) are no longer than a sentence or two, I'd argue the percentage is much higher.Monshroud said:
If somebody posts "Do you like [Insert Game/Movie/Book Here]?" You can guarantee that most replies will simply be "No, it sucks/was overrated/mediocre/overhyped." or "Yes, it rocks/is the best/better than sex".
:O I thought I shoot you. I guess the jokes on me. After all, I just had to buy my gun from Dante. Worthless peashooter.Monshroud said:
So that leaves 51.3% that are neither pointless nor useful. What exactly does that mean?SlainPwner666 said:
If the point is to be pointless, then it's contradictory.tijuanatim said:
*crack*
Congrats, you just broke the Internet.
I think 100% of tweets are pointless babble. This brings to mind something Yahtzee said on fullyramblomatic: There is nothing more boring than any given individual's answer to the question "What are you doing RIGHT NOW?" (no offence is intended to anyone who uses Twitter)
"In other news, an Idoha man died of natural causes, over to Ted with the Sports"ThatNewGuy said:
I've twittered. I like to think I tried something different, but ultimately I think it was a waste of time. I might come back to it, but I want it to be more than just "what are you doing?" Yes, that goes against the MO that Twitter was built under, but no more than using a weblogging service to post fiction.
See I used to think Twitter was all useless babble but a lot of people in the games industry use it, and even some hollywood directors do. So it's a nice way to find out what's going on quickly. Granted, even the professionals are prone to pointless babble, but they tend to be more witty about it.