Whoa, seriously? This story is more messed up than I thought, which is a pretty bad sign considering I already had the basic info on this article of the woman beating a 5-year-old child bad enough to kill him through internal injuries.notimeforlulz said:Wow... Now I definitely know that if I have kids, do not raise them like mine raised me...
Also, disgusted that she didn't take the child to the hospital for five days. I can't imagine the amount of pain that child would have been in leading up to his death. And if you don't know anatomy, it seems like his ribs may have broken and punctured his internal organs slightly. The woman had a working week to save her child's life, and she didn't do it.
Just read this on a proper journalist website, not MSNBC, and here's some extra info.
"lacerating his pancreas and intestine in the process" That's basically injuries akin to a car crash.
"The boy vomited and complained of agonising pain for five days before Crawford decided to seek medical help, fearing she would be arrested if she took him to hospital." And as I imagined, agonizing pain. The only people in history to have suffered as much as this child suffered, lived before we discovered leeching. People in hospital are dying, but they at least get morphine.
And that's why the law is going to throw the book at this woman as hard as they can. And I support them in it after reading the child suffered so much and could have been saved.
EDIT: The child eventually died of an infection, which possibly means the doctors didn't know about the internal injuries early enough to prescribe an anti-biotic/anti-septic. And if she denied the hospital staff permission to do an MRI, they could definitely charge her with murder. Which would explain the murder charge and the manslaughter charge.
OhJohnNo said:These official statements being...?stewox said:OhJohnNo said:9/11 really happened, mate. Dunno what planet you live on.stewox said:nothing unusual in america
some people still think 911 and some imaginary groups are real
OT: You know, I am very angry that I'm not shocked by this. What does that say about the world I live in?
This "mother" deserves the worse punishment she can get.
Im saying how supid people can be, these kind of people probably watch fox news all day, maybe the kid broken the TV just minutes before news hour
That the mother lives in bronx is probably not very surprising.
And with that "real" question i meant (you should have figured) "beliving into official statements"
Hard to say if this or the single mother who died from water poisoning in an attempt to win a Wii for her two children is more tragic.Earnest Cavalli said:That said, I do believe this is the most tragic incident to spring from the console's existence.
Honestly, I know not a single family where the parents consider beating their children, for whatever reason. Might be that European liberal ideology, but despite having a lot to do with parents and their children, I have never once experienced anyone showing any more sympathy for the concept than sheer and utter disgust.CosmicCommander said:Am I the only one who's not surprised? If a kid breaks a TV, their parents WILL beat ten cans of shite out of them.
R.I.P. kid.
I'm afraid I disagree with this standalone statement, but yes, murder one's child over a TV is ridiculous. But people can sure as hell be replaced.Pinstar said:Things can be replaced, people cannot.