50 Americanisms That Brits Apparently Hate
- Thread starter Shock and Awe
- Start date
Recommended Videos
Um... some of these are a little anal-retentive. Variations of a language are going to happen in other countries; that's how language, as a whole, evolves in the first place. Besides, fuckloads of English words are stolen and bastardized from Latin anyway, which I'm sure probably pissed off at least a few people back in the day.
I don't mind americanisms. A lot of my friends are from the US and Canada and I found that article to be an overreaction on the part of the brits interviewed. It's just the way someone talks. Don't make a big deal out of it. Also, I have always used the term train station. When has that been a bad use of english? Also, I have never heard the word "deplane" and when I asked my friends who live in the US, they never heard it either. They must get some weird folk going to the Netherlands...
In the 70s or 80s or some weird decade in the 20th century a lot of French people were getting pissed off with 'Franglais', where lots of french people were incorperating English into French. Goscinny and Uderzo even got a Asterix comic out of it (not a big book type one, just a page or two).
Look here everyone, that was simply an article on an exceedingly British website, where British people were engaging in an extremely British past-time of discontented grumbling amongst like-minded people. Nobody asked for Americans to intrude and read it. That's like eavesdropping on the neighbours whilst they're having a moan about how you need to trim your side of the hedge, then confronting them the next day and being all defensive about how you like it looking natural and prefer it the way it is. They weren't going to say anything to you, but now you've put them in an awkward situation where they have to justify and argue their side. Then things can only escalate. Soon you'll have the neighbours creeping into you're garden at night with clippers while you're planting weeds in theirs and... oh wait, sorry I've let the analogy run away with itself! I think the point I was making was, don't take it as a personal attack, just a few people grumbling away about how "people wouldn't speak like that if it was up to us!" without thinking that this was would end up as an actual debate.
It is rather interesting though, the differences between our two vernaculars. I think perhaps a thread should be started to document noted examples, without argument over which is correct or better.
It is rather interesting though, the differences between our two vernaculars. I think perhaps a thread should be started to document noted examples, without argument over which is correct or better.
Actually, in the UK we DO refer to people of South Asian descent (Pakistan, India, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka) as Asian, which, while technically right (since they are from the asian continent) leads to some confusian when people of East Asian descent are also referred to as Asian. What peeves me off is when people refer to East Asians (Thais, Koreans, Japanese etc.) all as 'Chinese,' or South Asians all as 'Indian.' That just smacks of ignorance and/or laziness.
I prefer the terms 'brown' and 'yellow.' Some would argue they're racist but a lot of S.Asians call themselves brown, and it's only fair if European-descendeds are 'white' and African-descendeds are 'black.'
ALSO: A full stop is what goes at the end of a sentence. A period is when a woman bleeds from her vagina.
I prefer the terms 'brown' and 'yellow.' Some would argue they're racist but a lot of S.Asians call themselves brown, and it's only fair if European-descendeds are 'white' and African-descendeds are 'black.'
ALSO: A full stop is what goes at the end of a sentence. A period is when a woman bleeds from her vagina.
As a Brit, I was ashamed by some of that stuff in the article. How are people "disgusted" by some of these terms? Languages adapt and change all the time and it's perfectly acceptable. I don't agree with something like text speak, but I don't mind Americanisms at all. We don't all say "thou hast" and "why art" any more, it's perfectly acceptable to not do that, but American phrases are unacceptable? Silly.
i would find myself disgusted with myself if i said z wrong (saying it like 'bee', but with a z, instead of like 'head' but wiyh a z), so he can be disgusted for saying shopping trolley wrong, i personally hate 'parking lot' when it's a car park, because CARS PARK there, and not always a lot... sometimes very littleNuuu said:
I see your point, but using that rule only we would get sentenced that are paragraphs long if we mention every single detail. Most of the meaning of a sentence is actually left to context, not the words themselves.Kair said:
The difference is local use or slang of a language....even within the US or any 2 parts of any nation you run into different speech patterns and different pronunciations.
I think the article is weak it is just people being upset that different areas in the world pronounce and use language differently....I know that Mass., NJ, PA, and CA use English differently and I'm betting the same people complaining in the article can find similiar types of differences they are whining about in London and Manchester.
This is just people being mad that people are different from them. Pathetic BBC I thought you had more sense then to promote bigoted views.
I think the article is weak it is just people being upset that different areas in the world pronounce and use language differently....I know that Mass., NJ, PA, and CA use English differently and I'm betting the same people complaining in the article can find similiar types of differences they are whining about in London and Manchester.
This is just people being mad that people are different from them. Pathetic BBC I thought you had more sense then to promote bigoted views.
no... i have troll repellant and English stiff-upper-lip abilities, THOU CANST NOT DEFEATETH ME!!!Kalezian said: