6 yr olds are more tech savvy than 45 yr olds.

Recommended Videos

SonOfVoorhees

New member
Aug 3, 2011
3,509
0
0
I read this on Yahoo and im sure its true. Kids are more confidence with tech than older people because they grew up with it. But then a 6 year old is pressing random buttons or dumb games. A 45 year old is all about their money, their future etc A 45 year old using the internet has a lot of consequences with their choices. A 6 year old has no consequence to what they are doing. Might as well compare a kid playing lego is better at building than a 45 year old builder.

So what do you think?
 

Jamash

Top Todger
Jun 25, 2008
3,638
0
0
If this is true, then 6 years olds may be more "tech savvy", as long as the tech is working properly and does everything it's supposed to, but if that piece of tech developed a fault and didn't switch on, I'd rather let a 45 year old solve the problem than have a 6 year old attempt to take it apart, fix a problem with the power supply and re-wire the plug or replace a battery.

Children may have naive confidence because they're ignorant of the consequences and dangers of the technology and only view it in a binary state of "working" or "not working", but I would dispute that this approach to technology is "savvy".

Hell, some children's alleged savvyness with technology and confidence to just do things goes hand in hand with them using their parents credit cards to buy thousands of pounds worth of digital goods for their free-to-play iPhone game, but that doesn't mean they're also "financially savvy" just because they can work a credit card or billing account.
 

DoPo

"You're not cleared for that."
Jan 30, 2012
8,665
0
0
AccursedTheory said:
About what?

Where are you going with this? What article? What tech? Money? Legos?
I am equally confused. I did look up the article and...it doesn't even dwell on this fact as much. It mostly uses it at the start and as an intcorrect title. Yes, their title is incorrect, worse still, the first sentence in the article proves it to be. Title

Six-Year-Olds More Tech-Savvy than 45-Year-Olds
First sentence

Six-year-old children show more confidence with technology than adults over the age of 45, according to a new Ofcom study.
(emphasis mine)

Ofcom themselves say

Six-year-olds show the same confidence with technology as 45 year olds
You can view the data they reference here [http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binaries/research/cmr/cmr14/2014_UK_CMR.pdf] (warning: it's a PDF) - go to page 43 and look at Figure 1.13 (the top of the page). It's a chart of...what they call DQ, which is supposed to be something like IQ but the first letter stands for "digital". Also, their test to determine DQ [http://ofcom.in/DQtest] is crap apparently, if I don't use 4G, I'd score lower...when there is no 4G coverage here for my network. Also, if I don't currently use high-speed internet, I also score lower...when, for example, I had a 100+ megabit line few months ago and then I moved and now BT are fucking liars and swindlers, thus actually reducing my DQ. And other odd questions that somehow determine how tech-savvy one is.
 
May 26, 2014
43
0
0
DQ sounds like a magazine I would neglect to purchase ;)

The fact that 6 year olds are as comfortable with touchscreens as 45 year olds is perhaps a relevant statement. Although perhaps not news...

Now, if a 6 year old can sort out a multiplatform network linking Windows 7 OS to older platforms, include certain industry specific networked devices using both wired and wireless connections, enable a secure transfer of data at a rate required given the nature of the file sizes involved, and maintain RJ45 cables in the appropriate hubs/switches, then he/she can have my job.

If not, it's back to Candy Crush Saga you little C*nt.
 

cathou

Souris la vie est un fromage
Apr 6, 2009
1,163
0
0
well, my two years old daugther is capable of taking the ipad, open it and unlock it, search in the icon her puzzle game, start it, and play with it. my wife's mother, is capable of doing that, and she's 58...


but frankly it only mean that my daugther have an ipad to play with, and my wife's mom doesnt...
 

Thuggych

New member
Mar 5, 2011
27
0
0
I was just reading a deadspin mailbag that addressed this topic, found their response to be pretty on point...

Children are relentlessly bored, and so they engage deeply with something like an iPad, because the image onscreen is changing all the time and stimulating their mind (but not their body, obviously). The technology beckons them to learn more and to spend hours and hours tinkering. Kids are better with technology than back when I was a child because the technology is just that much more inviting. And easier. When I was a kid, you had to type 50 lines of code (10 GOTO: XJ) just to see a block image of a cow on the screen. Things aren't quite so complex now. So don't be too impressed with little junior's ability to master Cut the Rope.
So basically, yes older people tend to be more technologically incompetent, but that has more to do with time/effort spent learning and interfacing with it


Source: http://theconcourse.deadspin.com/why-kids-today-are-so-much-better-with-computers-than-y-1615894131
 

AuronFtw

New member
Nov 29, 2010
514
0
0
Na, kids are terrible at technology. They can, sometimes, find their way through easy, consumer-designed interfaces enough to find the setting they want, but by and large they're ignorant about the majority of the devices they use.

They don't know how the devices work, they don't know how to fix them. They can't troubleshoot software or hardware problems outside of the most basic "turn it off and on again." They've never built a computer, they've never taken parts out of a laptop and replaced them, and what they're "used to" are largely proprietary corporation-approved locked devices that offer them little freedom as to what they can download or change. Being able to play minecraft on ipad does not make a 6 year old "good at computers."

If you want a more in-depth writeup on this topic, you can check out this blog post [http://www.coding2learn.org/blog/2013/07/29/kids-cant-use-computers/]. It covers everything I've said and more.
 

faefrost

New member
Jun 2, 2010
1,280
0
0
SonOfVoorhees said:
I read this on Yahoo and im sure its true. Kids are more confidence with tech than older people because they grew up with it. But then a 6 year old is pressing random buttons or dumb games. A 45 year old is all about their money, their future etc A 45 year old using the internet has a lot of consequences with their choices. A 6 year old has no consequence to what they are doing. Might as well compare a kid playing lego is better at building than a 45 year old builder.

So what do you think?
Your missing one of the key elements to it. Tech is in and of itself a graphical language. It is an evolving and adapting iconic language with subtle rules, structures, and context. Kids at that age just naturally absorb language, including the language of tech. Can the kids program full featured applications? No. But they almost intuitively understand the languages that are modern UI's. (Or rather the various "dialects" that make up the modern UI language.)

The best way to see this fully illustrated is take an iPad, and hand it to your 80 year old mother or grandmother. Someone who has never had to work at a Windows computer for years. Watch carefully where they have trouble with what seem like very clear instinctive things to you. They have no knowledge of the underlying languages that you have slowly spent years absorbing. Every icon. Every swipe. Every motion or mouseclick. A subtler way to see it is take someone used to and skilled on older Windows Operating Systems and give them a modern Apple or an iPad. The change from fixed purpose menus and presentations to context sensitive will drive them nuts. It's like trying to go from Spanish to Italian or Portuguese. There is some similarity there but working it out gets frustrating.
 

cathou

Souris la vie est un fromage
Apr 6, 2009
1,163
0
0
AuronFtw said:
Na, kids are terrible at technology. They can, sometimes, find their way through easy, consumer-designed interfaces enough to find the setting they want, but by and large they're ignorant about the majority of the devices they use.

They don't know how the devices work, they don't know how to fix them. They can't troubleshoot software or hardware problems outside of the most basic "turn it off and on again." They've never built a computer, they've never taken parts out of a laptop and replaced them, and what they're "used to" are largely proprietary corporation-approved locked devices that offer them little freedom as to what they can download or change. Being able to play minecraft on ipad does not make a 6 year old "good at computers."

If you want a more in-depth writeup on this topic, you can check out this blog post [http://www.coding2learn.org/blog/2013/07/29/kids-cant-use-computers/]. It covers everything I've said and more.
i dont agree with what they say in that blog. basically it's like saying that you are not a real driver if you cannot tear apart your car motor and built it back. 99% of people doesnt need to know exactly how a computer work, they need to use it. it's not because you cant program a driver in command line that you dont know how to use a computer.

kids dont have natural knowledge of technology, but they use it since they are babies. so they grow up with it and they have a instinct that develop. it give them an edge over someone that have just recently start to use the technology, but it doesnt give them IT knowledge.

but i think that child today that grow up will assimilate the knowledge faster if they take an IT course for exemple versus someone who didnt used technology when they were Young and that would take the same class.
 

AuronFtw

New member
Nov 29, 2010
514
0
0
cathou said:
AuronFtw said:
Na, kids are terrible at technology. They can, sometimes, find their way through easy, consumer-designed interfaces enough to find the setting they want, but by and large they're ignorant about the majority of the devices they use.

They don't know how the devices work, they don't know how to fix them. They can't troubleshoot software or hardware problems outside of the most basic "turn it off and on again." They've never built a computer, they've never taken parts out of a laptop and replaced them, and what they're "used to" are largely proprietary corporation-approved locked devices that offer them little freedom as to what they can download or change. Being able to play minecraft on ipad does not make a 6 year old "good at computers."

If you want a more in-depth writeup on this topic, you can check out this blog post [http://www.coding2learn.org/blog/2013/07/29/kids-cant-use-computers/]. It covers everything I've said and more.
i dont agree with what they say in that blog. basically it's like saying that you are not a real driver if you cannot tear apart your car motor and built it back.
No, he's merely addressing the claim that people make: kids are "experts" at computers. People who are "experts" at cars are expected to be able to tear apart motors and build them again. It's expected that they even do it as a hobby, and have plenty of practice and experience with it. People who only drive cars and know nothing about them aren't "car experts" in much the same way that people who watch cat videos on youtube aren't "computer experts."

99% of people doesnt need to know exactly how a computer work, they need to use it. it's not because you cant program a driver in command line that you dont know how to use a computer.
He qualified his statement by basically saying what he meant by "can't use a computer." Kids can, in fact, turn on their iphones, load up the internet browser, and watch cat videos. They can also log on their family computer and go on instagram and post pictures of their lunch. That requires nearly no skill or training whatsoever; it's not remarkable. When those devices stop functioning, or even throw up simple errors, the kid's inability to fix it betrays his ignorance of the device. Again, keep in mind that this is in response to someone saying "I guess these days you must find that the kids know more about computers than the teachers." Which is, in fact, commonly heard/stated. Not being able to fix basic (!) problems definitely counts against their knowledge of computers.

kids dont have natural knowledge of technology, but they use it since they are babies. so they grow up with it and they have a instinct that develop.
That was true of kids in the 80s and 90s - that is no longer true of kids today. In that era, most operating systems, and electronic devices in general, required a shitload of effort to set up and maintain. I got used to installing operating systems and constantly tweaking drivers when I was a child, because that's what windows 95, 98, 2000, and even XP required. In today's world, kids are growing up without that experience; they're using proprietary, locked devices that urge them to "send it in for repairs" when anything goes wrong, often being designed in such a way to make personal repairs impossible or a huge pain in the ass. Those devices remove the entire sandbox learning function that older devices mandated, and thus the "environment" of technology for kids now is very different. They don't learn those basics as part of the tech environment anymore. As the writer already pointed out, Windows 7 and OSX are very automated as far as drivers go. They attempt to detect new devices and obtain and install drivers for them automatically, and by and large, they succeed. But that means anyone using them will remain ignorant as to what drivers even are or how they work, so in the off chance that a driver error does occur, or you're using an obscure device that requires specific drivers, those people are going to be doubly fucked.

it give them an edge over someone that have just recently start to use the technology, but it doesnt give them IT knowledge.
Agreed. I think one of the more important things that kids learn is clicking on settings and messing around with various buttons, because that often leads to a fix, or at least gives you a better idea of how that program/device functions. Adults/older people are much more wary of jumping into all the settings and clicking things - partly because back in the day, that could be disastrous. Devices now are much more forgiving, and nearly everything can be reverted or fixed.

but i think that child today that grow up will assimilate the knowledge faster if they take an IT course for exemple versus someone who didnt used technology when they were Young and that would take the same class.
Yes, quite. But it's even better if they're exposed to tech knowledge *during* their critical period of development, so it becomes secondhand. They don't have to go into IT as a career, but in today's era, a bit of troubleshooting and tech knowledge is definitely not going to go to waste.
 

gim73

New member
Jul 17, 2008
526
0
0
Complete nonsense. A 45 year old grew up in the late seventies and eighties, and probably played Atari and Nintendo games growing up and used old school computers in school. Any job he went into would require computers to some extent. Chances are good that he built his own computer. The internet is only the way it is today because innovators who are now in their thirties and forties made it possible.

If you had top of the line tech to use as toys growing up, you would have some advantages there too. Most people know how to program in many coding languages. Technology changes. These technologically superior children will grow up and find that technology will change for them too. Unfortunately, they won't be able to effectively communicate because they are socially stunted and can only interface with other human beings via text messages.
 

lacktheknack

Je suis joined jewels.
Jan 19, 2009
19,316
0
0
Yeah, pick the tech.

The Fine Bros just posted a vid called "Kids React To Typewriters". As adorable as the video is, they were all pretty useless at using it. A forty-five year old, however, probably uses those things like a pro.
 

Smooth Operator

New member
Oct 5, 2010
8,162
0
0
You mean kids are better at doing the things they do for 16+ hours every day then someone who isn't? Well it only stands to reason that would be true.
But don't go hanging some grand revelation on it because that is a gigantic leap of stupid, learning to run does not instantly make you an Olympic gold medallist.
 

Ten Foot Bunny

I'm more of a dishwasher girl
Mar 19, 2014
807
0
0
AuronFtw said:
That was true of kids in the 80s and 90s - that is no longer true of kids today. In that era, most operating systems, and electronic devices in general, required a shitload of effort to set up and maintain. I got used to installing operating systems and constantly tweaking drivers when I was a child, because that's what windows 95, 98, 2000, and even XP required. In today's world, kids are growing up without that experience; they're using proprietary, locked devices that urge them to "send it in for repairs" when anything goes wrong, often being designed in such a way to make personal repairs impossible or a huge pain in the ass. Those devices remove the entire sandbox learning function that older devices mandated, and thus the "environment" of technology for kids now is very different. They don't learn those basics as part of the tech environment anymore. As the writer already pointed out, Windows 7 and OSX are very automated as far as drivers go. They attempt to detect new devices and obtain and install drivers for them automatically, and by and large, they succeed. But that means anyone using them will remain ignorant as to what drivers even are or how they work, so in the off chance that a driver error does occur, or you're using an obscure device that requires specific drivers, those people are going to be doubly fucked.
Interesting analysis, and one I never thought of! It'll be interesting to see how kids of today will develop tech-wise. Will they be adept at delving into advanced settings, or will things like "send it in" and Win8 Metro lead to a generation that stares blankly at the Windows Control Panel (or the equivalent of Control Panel in other environments)?

My guess is that they won't grow up to be WYSIWYG drones. Even if today's easy-to-use, predominantly automated systems define their childhoods, the need for advanced users will more than likely grow, and plenty of these kids will naturally develop an interest in toying around with settings that consumer-grade crap locks users out of. And besides, the open-source movement probably won't die anytime soon.

Just because we '80s kids had to learn MS-DOS 3.0, DOS Shell navigation, and how to fix persistent driver issues just to get our fucking keyboards back up and running doesn't mean that today's youth will grow up technologically lazy. :)