7 Games that Changed the World (according to Yahoo)

Recommended Videos

Locker420

New member
Jan 18, 2009
87
0
0
Sym4thy you make some good points but I guess I take issue with Yahoo making statements about games that "changed the world" when they are, in no way, a source of expert gaming information. If this was the 7 games yahoo thinks are cool I'd have no beef.
 

geldonyetich

New member
Aug 2, 2006
3,715
0
0
TheMatt said:
geldonyetich said:
Well, when you think about it, everything in the world conducts change of some kind, and so this "7 Games that Changed the World" thing is really just a buzz-line that is intended to induce sensationalism.
So's your mom!!! haha, burn.
It's the fact it almost works which makes it borderline funny. "My mom is a... buzz-line intended to induce sensationalism... oh, I can kinda see how the word 'sensationalism' is almost like sensation, yes, that almost works."
 

yourbeliefs

Bored at Work
Jan 30, 2009
781
0
0
TheMatt said:
geldonyetich said:
Well, when you think about it, everything in the world conducts change of some kind, and so this "7 Games that Changed the World" thing is really just a buzz-line that is intended to induce sensationalism.
So's your mom!!! haha, burn.

Seriously though, I completely forgot about Tetris. Good call.

question - what came first, super mario 1, or prince of persia (original)? those are the 2 earliest games I can remember that didn't operate consistently on the same background.
SMB came out in 1986 (in US), PoP came out in 1989.
 

Abedeus

New member
Sep 14, 2008
7,412
0
0
oliveira8 said:
Abedeus said:
oliveira8 said:
WoW is there cause of the massive impact it caused in the MMO market and gaming market. WoW made MMO's popular and a viable gaming genre.

Yes there was MMO's before but none matched the impact of WoW. Not saying that WoW is the best and has revolutionary gameplay but its for sure the most popular and groundbreaking one in terms of media and user-friendlyness.
What revolutionary gameplay? You grind your ass till 80, just so you can grind some more. And there's always someone better who spends twice as much time per week as you do.
I didnt say it had revolutionary gameplay...
Oh, right, misread. My bad.


Fraught said:
There is a disturbing lack of Super Mario Bros, Street Fighter, Super Mario Kart etc.
And this is arguable, but didn't Wolfenstein 3D change the world more than Doom?
Doom had true 3D, for example, it actually had Z-Axis. In Wolf, all levels were the same height.
 

Jumpman

New member
Sep 4, 2008
404
0
0
though everquest was around before world of warcraft, wow took everything that mmorpgs did and did them better. I honestly dont believe we would see the multitude of online games that exist today if it hadnt been for wow. plus, im fairly certain that if you looked hard enough, you could find an online game that predated everquest. arguing about who came first is a dead end, but no one can deny the size of wow. its undisputed, hence it makes the list.

I think mario would have been near the list too. he certainly changed gaming by basically inventing platforming, but that still had little reprecussion outside of the gaming world. keep in mind folks, its not a top 7 games ever list. its a list of games that changed the way the rest of the world thinks about gaming. and in that respect I think its pretty good.
 

John Funk

U.N. Owen Was Him?
Dec 20, 2005
20,364
0
0
WoW borrowed from EQ and DAoC (but made it significantly less painful. WoW is only a "grindfest" if you've never played games that ACTUALLY require grinding to reach the top. But... EQ and DAoC and all those games borrowed from Ultima Online. Which borrowed from Meridian.

What WoW did that was noteworthy, though, was it exploded the popularity of MMOs. For all EQ and DAoC were addictive and popular (by their contemporary standards), they never had entire South Park episodes dedicated to them. I think it unquestionably deserves to be on the list.

Others, though... DDR? really? And no SMB is really a glaring omission.
 

geldonyetich

New member
Aug 2, 2006
3,715
0
0
CantFaketheFunk said:
WoW borrowed from EQ and DAoC (but made it significantly less painful. WoW is only a "grindfest" if you've never played games that ACTUALLY require grinding to reach the top.
That might have been true at first, but when they raised the level cap, they brought the grind. What was something like 300 hours at release became what - 1000 hours now?

Granted, their casual-friendly initial grind did encourage the genre to embark down that road, so I guess that's something.
 

Anarchemitis

New member
Dec 23, 2007
9,102
0
0
ForrestDixon said:
FIRST!!!!! Wow I've been on GR to long.




Yes, Yes, Yes, we can all argue about what game we think changed the world. Its an opinion. Dont post everything you have seen (alot of people use yahoo). Just think about what people will find interesting before you post. Thanks for sharing though.
Never post about being the first onto a thread.
 

John Funk

U.N. Owen Was Him?
Dec 20, 2005
20,364
0
0
geldonyetich said:
CantFaketheFunk said:
WoW borrowed from EQ and DAoC (but made it significantly less painful. WoW is only a "grindfest" if you've never played games that ACTUALLY require grinding to reach the top.
That might have been true at first, but when they raised the level cap, they brought the grind. What was something like 300 hours at release became what - 1000 hours now?

Granted, their casual-friendly initial grind did encourage the genre to embark down that road, so I guess that's something.
And they simultaneously drastically lowered the requirements to get from 1-70 (and made the entire experience much smoother, to boot). Getting from 1-80 now takes about as long as it took to hit 60 back in the day.
 

yourbeliefs

Bored at Work
Jan 30, 2009
781
0
0
Anarchemitis said:
ForrestDixon said:
FIRST!!!!! Wow I've been on GR to long.




Yes, Yes, Yes, we can all argue about what game we think changed the world. Its an opinion. Dont post everything you have seen (alot of people use yahoo). Just think about what people will find interesting before you post. Thanks for sharing though.
Never post about being the first onto a thread.
Especially when you're not even first.
 

AgentNein

New member
Jun 14, 2008
1,476
0
0
Indigo_Dingo said:
PureChaos said:
Doom, no, DDR, no, the rest are understandable but there are other games that have done far more for than those.
Doom was the first FPS. Can't get more signifigant than that.
No. Wolfenstein 3d was. However, it's arguable that Doom was the FPS to launch a thousand FPS's.
 

Frank_Sinatra_

Digs Giant Robots
Dec 30, 2008
2,306
0
0
What E.T. for the Atari 2600 isn't there? It showed the world how bad we could really fuck up a game.
 

veloper

New member
Jan 20, 2009
4,597
0
0
Top 3:
1. Dune2. It is not only the very first RTS with base construction, it was also quality and very popular.

2. Rogue. First of it's kind and spawned the RPG genre. Not well known at the time ofcourse, since computers were for scientists at the time.

3. Doom. Not the first FPS, but the first FPS that did everything right and reached a huge audience. Fast code. Textured floors and ceilings. Z-axis. Variety of weapon types.

That's the 3 most succesful super genres into the 21st century accounted for.

Honerable mentions: pong, pitfall, kings quest, tetris
 

orifice

New member
Nov 18, 2008
414
0
0
What the hell? Where was elite on that list? Elite is probably the most groundbreaking game in history.
 

xxcloud417xx

New member
Oct 22, 2008
1,658
0
0
Super Mario was the birth of Platform games, The sims was the birth (or at least the perfection) of life simulation games (you'll probably say that it's the ONLY life sim game, but you forget that many games include life sim elements), Dune 2 was the birth of the rts. the rest I agree with though. except for putting Guitar Hero AND DDR, pick one, they're both simulation games, the only difference is one is dance and the other is playing music...