7 Games that Changed the World (according to Yahoo)

Recommended Videos

Fraught

New member
Aug 2, 2008
4,418
0
0
ColdStorage said:
Yeah I know, I was making a comment, I'm allowed that right? thanks

GT* interactive have design documents dating to Wolf3d's time regarding Duke Nukem 3D, it just took them forever to make it, if not them, someone else would have done it.

the GT in GT Interactive stands for "Good Times", hehe.
Seriously, a comment like this is what I would've expected from GameSpot, not The Escapist.

Point to me out where did I not allow you to post, except for the fact that you just decided to be a douchebag, and pretend I told you that, when I actually just expressed my opinion about the subject.
Or am I not allowed that? Surely you think I am not.

And wasn't it the same guys who made Wolf3D and Doom? John Carmack, and whoever that other guy was.
 

DigitalSushi

a gallardo? fine, I'll take it.
Dec 24, 2008
5,718
0
0
Fraught said:
ColdStorage said:
Yeah I know, I was making a comment, I'm allowed that right? thanks

GT* interactive have design documents dating to Wolf3d's time regarding Duke Nukem 3D, it just took them forever to make it, if not them, someone else would have done it.

the GT in GT Interactive stands for "Good Times", hehe.
Seriously, a comment like this is what I would've expected from GameSpot, not The Escapist.

Point to me out where did I not allow you to post, except for the fact that you just decided to be a douchebag, and pretend I told you that, when I actually just expressed my opinion about the subject.
Or am I not allowed that? Surely you think I am not.

And wasn't it the same guys who made Wolf3D and Doom? John Carmack, and whoever that other guy was.
can we both stop the douchebaggery?

Duke was designe by a guy called Brousard or something!, not Carmack, GT interactive used to be apogee or something.

christ I'm doing alot of "or something"
 

MarwoodBramwell

New member
Feb 4, 2009
30
0
0
OK, this isn't a list of games that changed anything other than "non-gamers perceptions".

You arm twist a non-gamer to write down 7 popular games and this would be the result. So it is more about culture infiltration than game-play or anything else. And actually these mainly seem to be games with non-standard interfaces, like dance mats etc which is possibly relevant. It is odd though to see both Myst (Hate it but it sold to non-gamer PC owners by the truck load) and The Sims missing from this.

The 6 games that actually changed things (cause pong has to be excluded cause it did actually change things in loads of ways) were the ones that INSPIRED the development of the other 6 on the list. The one that made Blizzard sit down and seriously look at MMOs, the money that was there and what they would alter/improve or leave the same in their own MMO. So in that case Everquest really, maybe Ultima and FFXI to a degree.

The games that are properly impressive though are the ones like Dune 2, where the rule book was thrown out and somehting new created. But they are sadly getting rarer.
 

jhonka

New member
Dec 11, 2008
23
0
0
EDIT: the former first line in my post sucked ass.

In the early 80's came space invaders, defender and such, so that can be though as the starting point, where it all began before them there hardly was any gamingcommunities. Second coming was the induction of nintendo as a more economical gaming platform. Third coming was rts by dune2 or more significantly C&C and all sorts of adventure games. Then came the doom which is to gaming as water is to life, essential! It's been said that some firms had a noticeable phase when doom effected their employers efficiency of work.

After that was the time for the indifferent tryouts and failures for making platforming into 3d(frogger, pandemonium etc), which was not perfected until mario 64 in 1996. At the same time there was tomb raider with a bit different approach to the game design but mario 64 was unarguably the first and most complete 3d platformer.

After that there hasn't been that much of a development of game's actual structure. The basic consept has remained the same and only minor adjustments have been made. You say that 3d shooters have evolved? Well there is a gun and some sort of a crosshair and then there are hordes of enemies that splatter in front of the forementioned gunbarrel. That's the consept and after doom only the execution has been evolved with the content's being basically the same. The only new type of games are rpg and arcade rpg(as in baldurs gate and diablo), but both of them appeared in the late 90's and basically all the games that have come after 1998 have been a newly revisioned version of something that has already been made.

Other significant games would include:

Thief: Introduced stealth gameplay
System shock 2: More complex story driven shooters(deus ex, half life, all the modern fps)
Descent: Space shooter with near 3d graphics
Mortal Kombat: fighting game
and probably some driving game, but since they are all the same game with the only difference being damage or no damage to the car, therefore you can put your favourite game here. If it's produced a decade ago, it will bear just as much significanse as does every cargame before or after. Minus the carmageddon 2, of course, since it kicked ass!!!!

EDIT: oh, and rpgs started with the rogue and rpg with ascii graphics was probably perfected with nethack or adom, though the latter was completed like 10 years after it's icons.
 

Fraught

New member
Aug 2, 2008
4,418
0
0
ColdStorage said:
Duke was designed by a guy called Brousard or something!, not Carmack, GT interactive used to be apogee or something.
...

Read my comment through. I said that John Carmack and "someone" made Doom and Wolf3D, not a word about Duke Nukem 3D.

But okay, let's stop arguing. It's getting annoying already.
 

ROFLross

New member
Jan 8, 2009
226
0
0
Uberjoe19 said:
They completely forgot Half-life 2!
No they didn't, it really isn't a game that changed the world.
Was definatly a disappointment more than anything for me.
Don't understand why so many people like it, it's just so bland.
 

yourbeliefs

Bored at Work
Jan 30, 2009
781
0
0
ROFLross said:
Uberjoe19 said:
They completely forgot Half-life 2!
No they didn't, it really isn't a game that changed the world.
Was definatly a disappointment more than anything for me.
Don't understand why so many people like it, it's just so bland.
I think you'd have to put HL1 before HL2. Both were revolutionary, but there wouldn't have been so much hype and anticipation for HL2 if HL1 had been a so-so game. It's not like Street Fighter -> Street Fighter 2 where the original was a laughable game at best, while the 2nd one spurted out like liquid gold from a random desert reminiscent of the beginning of "There Will Be Blood."
 

todd10k

New member
Dec 11, 2007
49
0
0
Raven28256 said:
Blah, the list is pretty pathetic, as I would expect from a non-gaming site trying to jump on the gaming bandwagon to stay "hip and cool" with the teenagers.

Really, Wii Sports? Wii Sports didn't change the gaming world. They probably just looked at the sales and said "WOW! Look how many copies!" and added it in. Duh, of course Wii Sports sold a lot, it was FUCKING BUNDLED WITH THE WII! To most people, Wii Sports was just a fun diversion until they could afford some other Wii games. No doubt about it, the Wii sent shock waves through the game industry because it attracted a whole new, untapped audience with older people who normally wouldn't play games, but I still wouldn't say that Wii Sports was what did it.

Really, The Sims, GTA III, Super Mario Bros, even Final Fantasy are all much more influential and they didn't get listed.
To you maybe. I think you're just jumping on the bandwagon. Most of the titles up there are there simply because they sold huge. This, whether you would like to admit it or not, is a revolutionary step for gaming because A.) it expands gaming audiences B.) Creates new markets and C.) Dispels the "only for kids" moniker that gaming has carried since the early days.

If gaming is ever to become a legitimate art form it needs to have a massive base of people who enjoy it. I mean, if you go to any shopping center, you will see a cinema. this is because most people enjoy watching a film. in 20 or 30 years time you may go to a shopping center and see a gaming center right beside it. it'll only be when theres lots of cash to be made off it by the guy who's not making the games that gaming will mature into that entertainment medium we want it to be. For this to happen, 1 out of 4 people need to be gamers. we're nowhere near that. but every release that sells as big as those titles pushes us closer to that target. And would you not say thats revolutionary?

Also, walk up to any girl in the street and try start a conversation about final fantasy VII or street fighter. Ill give you 10 seconds before they laugh and make an L shape on their forehead. Now do the same but talk about a film like step brothers or twilight, and you might just be in there my son. Simply because gaming has not seeped into culture like film and music has.
 

Laughing Man

New member
Oct 10, 2008
1,715
0
0
That's a BIT of an understatement. GTA1 + 2 are almost unrecognizable compared to GTA3. After GTA3 came out, "GTA 3 Clone" was used so commonly to describe games afterwards
Why GTA3? Let's not forget that Driver managed the 3D city scape driving game thing a gaming generation before GTA3 even saw the light of day and if I am correct Driver 2 managed to allow you to get out and swap cars again on a generation before the GTA3 era came about. GTA just expanded on the foundations laid by the first two Driver games.
 

ElephantGuts

New member
Jul 9, 2008
3,520
0
0
Grand Theft Auto 3 is not on this list? Fail. When I think of games that changed the world, I think of GTA3. Number one.
 

johnman

New member
Oct 14, 2008
2,915
0
0
Thats a list of popular games not important ones.
I dont know why yahoo bother, all they do is fill the ingornatn with crap they can later pull out of their arses
"But i heard Wii sports changed the world!"
 

Nargleblarg

New member
Jun 24, 2008
1,583
0
0
Really pong and pacman... I never liked those and I don't know many who do.

I thought maybe oh i don't know mario, halo, gta (especially san andreas controversy) were really big but ok Yahoo I guess you know more about games then gamers.
 

ForrestDixon

New member
Jan 9, 2009
167
0
0
Anarchemitis said:
ForrestDixon said:
FIRST!!!!! Wow I've been on GR to long.




Yes, Yes, Yes, we can all argue about what game we think changed the world. Its an opinion. Dont post everything you have seen (alot of people use yahoo). Just think about what people will find interesting before you post. Thanks for sharing though.
Never post about being the first onto a thread.

It was a joke. I had been on GR for like 4 hours before I got on hear, sorry.
 

EzraPound

New member
Jan 26, 2008
1,763
0
0
Pong, Space Invaders, Pac-Man, Ultima, Super Mario Bros., Dragon Warrior, Tetris, SimCity, Dune II, DOOM, Street Fighter II, Super Mario 64, Half-Life, Grand Theft Auto III.

I really don't see how GTA3 would make that list.. GTA3 only took the already successful first 3 real GTA games (GTA, GTA: 1969 London, GTA2) to third person view with sub-par graphics. Don't get me wrong, GTAIII is still my favourite out of all the GTA's.
Well, it only popularized sand-box gaming.

Final Fantasy 1, Dune 2.
FF1 doesn't stand a chance. It was basically a copy of Dragon Warrior/Quest (first JRPG definable as such, essentially), which was in turn inspired by games like Ultima and Wizardry.

I do and don't agree about the WOW vs EQ. I'm actually an EQ player and I don't like WOW it is just not for me. EQ did change a lot and started a lot of revolutions/evolutions in online gaming but when it comes down to the 2 games head to head, WOW for better or worse has effected a larger audience then EQ ever did. But then you could argue games like WOW and other MMORPGs wouldn't exist without EQ's first steps. But even then they were MMORPGs before EQ.
I would say Ultima Online takes the most influental MMORPG award.

And this is arguable, but didn't Wolfenstein 3D change the world more than Doom?
DOOM popularized the FPS genre. If we want to try to reduce the argument to a "who did what first" ordeal instead of a "who influenced whom" one, I imagine we could say Ultima Underworld or Catacomb 3D was more important than DOOM.
 

Drbog

New member
Jun 11, 2008
43
0
0
I'm not a WoW player,but the abuse they get is out of hand it's on the list because IT'S THE MOST (money-wise) SUCCESSFULL GAME EVER.