You find the idea of being battered, stripped naked and bullied by three people much larger than yourself on film and then have it shown to the world to be appealing?Battlemind said:I wished girls did that to me.
I'm not seeing the reason there.
You find the idea of being battered, stripped naked and bullied by three people much larger than yourself on film and then have it shown to the world to be appealing?Battlemind said:I wished girls did that to me.
methinks:Knife-28 said:Secret world leader (shhh) said:The mother is a fucking retard, let the boy press charges, have the girls stripped naked and then post the videoes to all known paedophile websites (names and addresses included)
Why is everyone getting so worked up about this? It's just A PRANK! You guys are all wound up too tightly, it's just A PRANK! The mother should have only pressed charges if it were a girl getting stripped naked -essentially sexually assaulted- in front of many oh so evil spectators by 13 year-old boys as girls are physically impossible of rape or any of your disgusting man-crimes you silly people!say to you.![]()
That is all I am going to you.
Anyway, on topic, It's horrible, and the girls involved should face what's going to them.
Clearly you've never wandered too deep into the recesses of the internet. There are people out there that would (and often do) pay good money for that kind of treatment. =PShio said:You find the idea of being battered, stripped naked and bullied by three people much larger than yourself on film and then have it shown to the world to be appealing?Battlemind said:I wished girls did that to me.
I'm not seeing the reason there.
See, I have no trouble with a two-working-parents home. But I fail to see why parents are more concernsed with breaking that 2000-3000/week mark salaries. I mean I've heard all sorts of excuses "oh ... we work so much because mortgage, and food, and electricity, and the 2 cars, and books, and uniforms, etc etc etc etc. Raising a child isn't cheap" ...Shio said:The cynicism is strong in this one
But yeah, I agree with you. Parental accountability is all but gone. I'm far from sexist and the idea of men and women having separate roles is as alien to me as homosexuality being unethical and a danger to children, but I think with women now expected almost as much as men to get a job and have a career, most households have two working parents. In the days gone by one parent (usually/always) the mum would stay home, look after the house and educate the kids on behavior, with the father disciplining them. As that system no longer happens, kids spend most of their time at school and parent-less.
It's not surprising, but it's still sad. Maybe children do need a parent to stay home (male or female doesn't matter) to bring a little accountability and actual parenting back into the world. But that just won't work for so many families; living aint cheap.
I know if I were the parent of one of these girls I would force the state to press charges. Then I would send her ass to a boarding school.Merkavar said:yeah these girls from what i can tell are just going to be punished by their parents. so no suspened from school no detention no police charges.arcade109 said:Because yknow, 3 boys doing that to a girl is just a silly prank gone a wee bit too far right? right? No fuck that. Theyd get charged and so should these girls.
what are there parents going to do? ground them for a week? a month. hardly seems like much of a punishment for humilating and assualting someone like they did.
Up until the "no charges pressed" part, I actually thought you got this confused with an episode of 'Without a Trace' that played out exactly the same way.callmegreen said:I'm Not going to lie to you.Cyrus Hanley said:Most of my sentiments of this event have already been expressed. The mother's refusal to press charges against the three girls may not be the right thing to do "legally", but let us remind ourselves that she is doing this in the best interests of her son. Right now, her main priority as a mother is to comfort her child and provide emotional support.
It's not uncommon for sexual assault or rape victims to decline pressing charges against the assailants or even to actually report the incident, and I don't expect any different in this situation. But, with the amount of press coverage this has received (as well as the actual evidence), I have no doubt that the girls will be charged with the sexual assault of a minor. Just not at this time.
As for the boy himself... I hope he gets whatever help he needs.
Now, with this having been said, I wonder two things.
a) What will feminists have to say of this?
and b) How long it will be before we see an episode of Law and Order: Special Victims Unit based on this incident?
Ive ACTUALLY SEEN and episode of Law and order that played out EXACTLY like this.. I shall now explain the episode.
Okay some some 13 year old kid whose puberty as shit calls a girl ugly trying to impress a hot girl in his class.
Little does he know that the ugly girl is friends with the hot girl So they plan some kind of attack.
The hot girl pretends to take the kid into a back alley and say's she gonna Get it on with him.
She makes the kid take off his clothes down to his undies and then asks him to put on these handcuffs.
she handcuffs him to a sewer pole, all the other girls comeout a d spit on him and throw dirt at him a tape it and post it online
the kid runs away
kid tries to hang himself on monkey bars
the SVU saves the kids life
Girls don't get charged
kid shoots himself a week later after the video goes viral
They want to at least charge the girls for child pornography possession. This case does not count as CP under the legal definition. Understandable. That's how the law works.Shio said:No. I don't see it as pornographic. No more than a picture of a young child at the beach or running around naked in the home. Of course in this case the images are more disturbing and sickening even, but no more pornographic.RedEyesBlackGamer said:Do you at least agree with the child pornography charges a few people are calling for? That isn't really subjective. They recorded and released nude footage of a 11 year old boy.Shio said:snip
Pornography as defined my Merriam Webster: "the depiction of erotic behavior (as in pictures or writing) intended to cause sexual excitement."
I don't think the images are intended to sexual arouse people.
EDIT: to add to this, nude images of children are perfectly legal. So long as they aren't erotic. See: nudist images and art, etc., etc.
Who says women can't rape?William MacKay said:women cant rape but they can sexually assault, but cant be charged because the government is retarded.Secret world leader (shhh) said:The mother is a fucking retard, let the boy press charges, have the girls stripped naked and then post the videoes to all known paedophile websites (names and addresses included)
Why is everyone getting so worked up about this? It's just A PRANK! You guys are all wound up too tightly, it's just A PRANK! The mother should have only pressed charges if it were a girl getting stripped naked -essentially sexually assaulted- in front of many oh so evil spectators by 13 year-old boys as girls are physically impossible of rape or any of your disgusting man-crimes you silly people!
It's funny cus it is.. and it was the first thing that popped into my head aswell (Y)s0m3th1ng said:Isn't this the plot of a GTO story arc?
Sexual fetishes, you gotta have some for all tastes you knowShio said:You find the idea of being battered, stripped naked and bullied by three people much larger than yourself on film and then have it shown to the world to be appealing?Battlemind said:I wished girls did that to me.
I'm not seeing the reason there.