That sounds like the equivalent of cutting off a person's hands for stealing, like they did in feudal Japan. Trusting the government with the power to castrate human beings would be detrimental to testicle safety, and castrating him will just make him more twisted and violent.Razhem said:Seeing how the girl was beaten into a bloody state, including her genitalia, they were both alone in the house, the boy has wounds that the investigators have associated with the self defence of the girl and if the little bastard is capable of ejaculating, there should be samples inside the girl. Sounds pretty damn clear to me.Federalist92 said:He will after hes been castrated.Adaephon Delat said:Castration seems appropriate. That way, he gets punished for what he did and can never do it again. Oh, and he needs a hell of a lot of counselling.
No one seems to think that castrating him might make him so sexually frustrated and depressed that rather than raping people in the future, he might start killing them.
Also, no one seems to think that perhaps this guy might not have done anything.
The article says ACCUSED. How would you like it if you were ACCUSED of rape when you didnt do it and were treated as guilty untill proven innocent.
This could all have been some elaborate hoax by the poor girls family or something even worse.
You don't know. Most of you are on the other side of the world.
Seeing how I fail to see why we shouldn't castrate fully grown rapists and paedophiles, castrating the little monster still stands in my mind.Sewblon said:We don't castrate fully grown rapists or pedophiles. How do you justify castrating a child? The only solution I see is to imprison him either for life or until he goes impotent. This puts sex crime in a new perspective for me.Adaephon Delat said:Castration seems appropriate. That way, he gets punished for what he did and can never do it again. Oh, and he needs a hell of a lot of counselling.