"A man walks into a bar" 2

Recommended Videos

Relish in Chaos

New member
Mar 7, 2012
2,660
0
0
So this post on the "A man walks into a bar" thread

Bertylicious said:
A much more pertinent question would be to ask people if they'd let the stranger spunk in their bum-hole for 5 million. That way people will be able to recognise whether or not they are whores.
got me thinking, and since it wasn't the focus of the thread, I thought I'd make one for it, but alter the conditions. Forgive me if this sounds like the bad intro to a porn film or something.

So you're in the empty bathroom of a bar, doing your business, when a man in a suit walks into and stands besides you, admiring your junk. Assuming you don't go looking for these scenarios, you're shocked, finish and tuck it back in (and, if you're not freaked out already, you shout him down). He tells you that he'll give you £1 million if you let him fuck you in the ass, in broad daylight, in public. He says that he'll give you the money first upfront, but he has a gun in his pocket, and if you try to run away, he'll shoot you dead.

Would you accept or decline his offer?

EDIT: He gives you proof that he's done an STD test and he's clean.
 

Jonluw

New member
May 23, 2010
7,245
0
0
Sell some dick-vacancy in my bumhole for £1 million or be shot dead you say?
It's unappealing, but I guess I'd have to go with the option I'd survive.

Edit: Or are you saying he'll shoot me only if I try to run away with the money?

I guess I might be willing to let him park his e series in my rear garage for a bit for that kind of money.
 

Andy Shandy

Fucked if I know
Jun 7, 2010
4,797
0
0
Jonluw said:
I guess I might be willing to let him park his e-series in my rectum for a bit for that kind of money.
And now I have to clean up the drink I just spit out. Thanks for that XD

Anyway for a high amount of money, with a big enough sum, I could move away from the place where I'd been just been bummed, to somewhere where no one knows about it.
 

Jonluw

New member
May 23, 2010
7,245
0
0
Andy Shandy said:
Jonluw said:
I guess I might be willing to let him park his e-series in my rectum for a bit for that kind of money.
And now I have to clean up the drink I just spit out. Thanks for that XD
Hooray. I was worried no one would get that one. But as it turned out, second poster after me.
 

Heronblade

New member
Apr 12, 2011
1,204
0
0
I'd take the million, wait till we leave the bathroom and are "in public", and then leave him standing there expecting a ride. He'll be perfectly free to complain about not being able to commit a crime all he likes.

If forced to deal straight with him, the answer is hell no.
 

Freechoice

New member
Dec 6, 2010
1,019
0
0
Matthew94 said:
Yeah, why not. As long as he could prove that he didn't have any STDs.

Hell, you might even enjoy it. Win-win I say.
That's one of the reasons I don't believe in God. What higher power puts a pleasure organ in a place where you have to shove something up your ass to get at?

Also, I'm reminded of this.


Ironically, the guy with the dick name was the one not being gay. Granted, he fits under this criterion:


but hey, they play games for a living. They're all kinda fuckin' weird.
 

bobmus

Full Frontal Nerdity
May 25, 2010
2,285
0
41
http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m3zd1qB5LS1qkj52yo1_500.gif

I'd have to be exceptionally destitute to say yes to such an offer. So no. No no no no.
 

Jedoro

New member
Jun 28, 2009
5,393
0
0
Heronblade said:
I'd take the million, wait till we leave the bathroom and are "in public", and then leave him standing there expecting a ride. He'll be perfectly free to complain about not being able to commit a crime all he likes.

If forced to deal straight with him, the answer is hell no.
This

Because even if he does shoot me, at least he'll be caught and punished.
 

manaman

New member
Sep 2, 2007
3,218
0
0
Everyone has a price. You seem to by trying to set the price exceptionally in the intent of proving the vast majority are whores.

That is wrong. Being a whore actually involves taking or asking very little for sex. Which in itself isn't really a bad thing.

That low price could simply be your own enjoyment. It could be $15 for a blowjob as I was offered once by a very kindly stripper with an oddly deep voice in Seattle. It also involves doing so on a regular basis. There is no way that taking an absurdly large amount of money for some form of sex one time makes one a whore. Except by way of whore also being a term for a prostitute and a prostitute being a person who takes money for sex.

There is also the evident homophobia in this post as well. The public shaming is hardly touched on at all as a factor in the hypothetical scenario. What does get most of the attention is the fact that this is a guy asking another guy, and the implied wrongness of that action.
 

Relish in Chaos

New member
Mar 7, 2012
2,660
0
0
manaman said:
Everyone has a price. You seem to by trying to set the price exceptionally in the intent of proving the vast majority are whores.

That is wrong. Being a whore actually involves taking or asking very little for sex. Which in itself isn't really a bad thing.

That low price could simply be your own enjoyment. It could be $15 for a blowjob as I was offered once by a very kindly stripper with an oddly deep voice in Seattle. It also involves doing so on a regular basis. There is no way that taking an absurdly large amount of money for some form of sex one time makes one a whore. Except by way of whore also being a term for a prostitute and a prostitute being a person who takes money for sex.

There is also the evident homophobia in this post as well. The public shaming is hardly touched on at all as a factor in the hypothetical scenario. What does get most of the attention is the fact that this is a guy asking another guy, and the implied wrongness of that action.
What are you on about? It was that other guy who said that it makes you a whore.

And of course, I'm "evidently homophobic". Because you know me in person, right? I didn't touch on the public shaming because the consequences of being done in public should be obvious. The only way it's wrong is if you morally object to letting a stranger have sex with you in public, as well as it being an illegal act itself. It's nothing to do with sexual orientation.

I guess I did kind of aim this question about men, however, so perhaps I should apologize for any offence that may've been taken, but that was not my intention. Jeez, people should just lighten up around here.
 

manaman

New member
Sep 2, 2007
3,218
0
0
Relish in Chaos said:
manaman said:
Everyone has a price. You seem to by trying to set the price exceptionally in the intent of proving the vast majority are whores.

That is wrong. Being a whore actually involves taking or asking very little for sex. Which in itself isn't really a bad thing.

That low price could simply be your own enjoyment. It could be $15 for a blowjob as I was offered once by a very kindly stripper with an oddly deep voice in Seattle. It also involves doing so on a regular basis. There is no way that taking an absurdly large amount of money for some form of sex one time makes one a whore. Except by way of whore also being a term for a prostitute and a prostitute being a person who takes money for sex.

There is also the evident homophobia in this post as well. The public shaming is hardly touched on at all as a factor in the hypothetical scenario. What does get most of the attention is the fact that this is a guy asking another guy, and the implied wrongness of that action.
What are you on about? It was that other guy who said that it makes you a whore.

And of course, I'm "evidently homophobic". Because you know me in person, right? I didn't touch on the public shaming because the consequences of being done in public should be obvious. The only way it's wrong is if you morally object to letting a stranger have sex with you in public, as well as it being an illegal act itself. It's nothing to do with sexual orientation.
You don't have to actually say (or type) a word or phrase to imply something. Wrongness is attributed to the entire scenario by the fact that you imply money is needed to coerce someone into doing it. Which is true, most people do not immediately have sex with strangers in public places just because they are asked nicely. The overall context is the wrongness of those actions. That more weight is held on the fact that is is a man asking another man than the public shaming it can lead one to believe that it is more important to you. Also the unneeded inclusion in the setup (especially they way it is worded) of a man looking at another man's penis makes it seem like that is a very real worry to you. Hence the evident homophobia.

I'm not saying you go around making fun of homosexuals. I'm not even saying you think about doing it. What I am saying is that homosexuality is confusing to you and confusing things cause people to be apprehensive about them, and that when they are apprehensive about them without know why they shy away from them and treat them differently. You probably shy away from other males in those confusing situations that can be intimate (and no sexual connotations are not what you should think of first with that word it means personal, private, close etc).

As for the rest of that statement which I have separated out here:

Relish in Chaos said:
I guess I did kind of aim this question about men, however, so perhaps I should apologize for any offence that may've been taken, but that was not my intention. Jeez, people should just lighten up around here.
That is the mother of all fake apologies. You are basically saying I must have been offended, and you are sorry that I was offended. Not even sorry that you caused offense through confusion. No it's all my fault I was confused and you are just sorry it happened. Not that I was offended anyway. I don't really have any basis to be offended. I'm not gay. I don't have any gay family members or friends. I supposed my sister could qualify as a whore, but that is all her choice. I was simply pointing out something.
 

Dags90

New member
Oct 27, 2009
4,683
0
0
A million pounds isn't enough to justify the very real possibility of being a convicted sex offender for life. I have no problem with the gay sex part, but the other details need some rejiggering.
 

Starik20X6

New member
Oct 28, 2009
1,685
0
0
Too many factors.

How public is public? Does public mean just outside or in the middle of the busiest street in town?

Does the guy look like this?


Or like this?


Can I change the deal? Settle for less money if it's not in public, that sort of thing?

Gotta factor in the exchange rate as well. Right now, a million pounds is $1,606,714.738 AU. Not exactly an amount to sneeze at...
 

Ectoplasmicz

New member
Nov 23, 2011
768
0
0
I can't see why not.

Now that I can see others also think this, I'm not as standoffish about posting this.
 

tobi the good boy

New member
Dec 16, 2007
1,229
0
0
I would respectfully decline.

kman123 said:
Why the fuck not? I get to live and keep 1 mil in cash. What kind of idiot would rather be shot dead? Christ...what an awful question.
He only tries to shoot you if you try to leave with the money