A person with her head jammed firmly in her ass.

[Blunderboy]

Dude, that was ages ago.
Why are you bringing that up again?
I won't open the link because I will be transfixed by her beauty and just stare at my screen for the next three weeks, not moving to eat, sleep or use the bathroom. It will happen all over again.
She's just so beautiful... *tears up*

 

[Seventh Actuality]

I think she's a poor idiot the Mail deliberately exploits by encouraging her to write articles they know will incense most of their audience and make the rounds with both misogynists and feminists. Trolling their own readers is how they get a lot of their hits and became one of the most visited news sites around.

This takedown [http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/apr/04/samantha-brick-thrown-to-wolves] was written at the time and is pretty much spot on (yeah, I know, the Guardian isn't that much better than the Mail overall).

 

[Elementary - Dear Watson]

Daily mail? This will never end well.

*searches*

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2124246/Samantha-Brick-downsides-looking-pretty-Why-women-hate-beautiful.html

Well, she has a bit of ego so it's nice we share that in common. But before we totally condemn her have a little read of this, I found interesting:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/apr/04/samantha-brick-thrown-to-wolves

I don't usually care much for the Guardian, but I liked that article... put things into perspective... but also confirmed all assumptions I had made on ol' Sam Brick... that she was a bit of a desparate sell out anyway... and severely misguided... but there would have also have been a negative input from arguably the worst paper in Britain!

(Although, the crossword is the only one in a paper I can complete on my own... as I suck at cryptic, and can only do parts to most of others...! So that is the only slightly redeeming quality the paper has! )

 

[Quoth]

Indeed I should have stopped at Daily mail as well. Skimmed the articles and I think it's lovely that someone with such a big ego is given the opportunity to be allowed in to public.

 

[Goofguy]

Come on, man. Don't ask for our opinion on something and not provide us with the means to inform ourselves. The least you could have done is give us the links so you could provide some context to your thread as opposed to just saying "let's talk about this but you do my homework for me".

OT: This woman appears to have a few screws loose. Kind of funny that she married a guy with a handlebar mustache.

 

[Hjalmar Fryklund]

Oh right, her. Well, there is a relevant video here:

Spoiler: NSFW

 

[KINGBeerZ]

"people hate me because i'm too pretty"
no people hate you because you're so up yourself that they can't stand to be around you.

 

[MelasZepheos_v1legacy]

Daily mail? This will never end well.

*searches*

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2124246/Samantha-Brick-downsides-looking-pretty-Why-women-hate-beautiful.html

Well, she has a bit of ego so it's nice we share that in common. But before we totally condemn her have a little read of this, I found interesting:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/apr/04/samantha-brick-thrown-to-wolves

And the Guardian attacking the Mail. This ought to be obvious.

I don't like the Mail, and I do read the Guardian fairly often, but they are just as biased towards the Mail as the Mail is towards women, gays, blacks, Jews, politicians, people, cancer and the causes thereof and other newspapers. So take any Guardian article about the Mail with just as much salt as you take the Mail.

As for this woman. She's hilarious to read. But she's not (exactly) wrong. Pretty women get treated poorly by other women, and they get fawned over by men. No this is not true for every single male and female in the world, but there are studies done into this, and they all point towards more attractive females being treated poorly by other wome, even other attractive ones, and receiving unwanted attention from men.

However, I don't like blondes.

 

[Bassik]

Who knows what the original article looked like? The daily mail is notorious amongst freelance writers for changing your articles into some twisted abomination, all in the name of the Almighty Dollar... or pound, or whatever currency they worship.

 

[Woodsey]

It's the Daily Mail. They're all fucking whack-jobs; the only people who read it do so ironically or are inclined towards whack-jobbery themselves.

 

[yuval152]

*sees daily mail mentioned*

NOO!, well I'm curious.

*sees her pictures*

 

[Calibanbutcher]

Is it just me, or would you chaps agree that Samantha Brick looks as if her face met a brick a few times too often?

What I am trying to get at here is, that she has the looks of a brick wall.

I mean she shouldn't act as if her looks are cast in stone.

 

[Mr F.]

I thought this would be another "Why I hate Anita Sarkeesian" thread or something similar, so I appeared to try and make myself feel better and other people feel small.

Instead I am just being asked to read the Daily Mail? Hell to the fucking no, I am not giving them a penny of add revenue, even if I am just going there to make myself feel better about how fucking stupid people are. The Daily Mail is a shit sheet, an expensive shit sheet. Steaming piles of horse shit have more to say, and contain more original thought, then the daily fucking mail. Tis a cut above the Express, but so are things under rocks.

Remember kids, Reading the daily mail gives you cancer.

Like just about everything else, according to the daily mail

http://kill-or-cure.heroku.com/

 

[Fishyash]

Here's samantha in video format, since you all think she is so beautiful that video footage of her would be absolutely mandatory.

 

[Relish in Chaos]

This woman is nothing more than a bad satirist seeking attention, and luckily for her, you're giving publicity to her by posting links to her articles and complaining about her.

 

[Zen Toombs]

talk about an anti-climax. I've got to stop reading thread titles and interpreting them literally, save myself the heartache

Seriously, misleading titles are all of the misleading.

Off to a topic that's less misleading and sadface making - I got a kitten! She's cute and tiny and I named her River! She's sneezing right now though 'cuz she has a pair of URI's. :-(
[small]the sneezing is pretty adorable though[/small]

 

[DJjaffacake]

arguably the worst paper in Britain!

No no no no no, the Express is the worst paper in Britain. I once saw a front page Express headline that actually read, "Secret EU plot to ban Britain." On the scale of shittiness, the Mail is what happens after you eat a curry, the Express is what happens after you spend three weeks in India.