I'm a huge Total War fan...does it come close to capturing that series' depth and scope? Or is a lightweight game with similar game play elements? If it's basically Total War: Fantasyland then I'm gonna snatch it right up.T7nowhere said:@BloatedGuppy
King Arthur is very similar to Total War: Shogun, except set in The mystical land of England. its a mix of Medieval and Fantasy. The game has an overworld where you build up your territories and train your Fighting units. There is a System similar to shogun but instead of Generals you have Hero's which will preside over your land and lead your armies to war. You can also send them on RPG'esk quests which are text based but are essential to the progression of the games story.
The overworld map is smaller like the Shogun series, but not nearly as grand or complex as Empire Series. For 10 bucks you can't really go wrong. I would suggest trying out the demo it will give you good taste of the game play.BloatedGuppy said:I'm a huge Total War fan...does it come close to capturing that series' depth and scope? Or is a lightweight game with similar game play elements? If it's basically Total War: Fantasyland then I'm gonna snatch it right up.
Cool, thanks for the insights! I might stick with Mount and Blade for my "Total-Warish" buzz for now.T7nowhere said:The overworld map is smaller like the Shogun series, but not nearly as grand or complex as Empire Series. For 10 bucks you can't really go wrong. I would suggest trying out the demo it will give you good taste of the game play.
I personally think the Total war series are much better games but I still enjoyed King Arthur for a good 40 hours.
King Arthur is an odd game because i personally didn't enjoy the combat much but thought the campaign screen although a bit clunky was really good, especially the adventures.BloatedGuppy said:Oooh. Mount and Blade: Warband is on sale. And Elven Legacy. I highly recommend both.
Has anyone tried that King Arthur RTS game? Can you tell me what it's like if you have?