It SHOULD, but it never will be called 'American Rugby'; the football part implies that America's tougher than other countries (yes, it's that jingoistic patriotism wankery again), and if they actually admitted it was a different sport people would compare it and say 'Hey! These guys need padding and extra breaks! That's not tough, they suck!"Tom Phoenix said:Super Bowl? What's that? A super-sized dish?
Just kidding. But really, I have no interest in American Football (although, to be honest, I always thought it should have been named "American Rugby"). Although, frankly, I have no interest in sports in general. At best, I, on a very, very rare ocassion, watch a football (or soccer, as people in the US like to call it) match.
i just have to say, teddy bruschi ftw!Canid117 said:call this man a wussy to his faceMerkavar said:maybe if the super bowl was a real sport. like one that was played and finished in under 3 hours and the players werent covered in wussy armour from head to toe it might be worth watching
![]()
go ahead I mean he wears pads so he can't be that tough right?
Rugby has actually started becoming popular. Plus, lets not forget that they did score a try against the current world champions.Fire Daemon said:Probably not. It's on now, but I have study I should be doing, and it looks like a pretty boring sport anyway. Rugby is where it's at, but I wonder how many yanks even know what Rugby is?