I live in the north around those mining communities as a matter of fact. Still, I believe the right action was taken to suppress the power-hungry trade unions and other sympathy strikers. A good leader listens to the mood of the people but also knows when it is necessary to prevent the people from growing too powerful and dictating policies to suit their own selfish ends. Also democracy as we see it today is packed with politicians who have no strong ideals in the slightest, are voted in not on their ability to govern but by how charismatic they are. If you wouldn't want a plumber performing a surgery then why would you want an incompetent and deceitful yet popular person as leader of the country. Idealism should be intrinsic to politics and Margaret Thatcher, although questionable at times, showed qualities of a great leader that can maintain order and stability from strikers and the like. Also I think that the qualities you used to describe a great leader are unrealistic. It is very rare to possess all the virtues of a great leader without sacrificing anything, like compassion for order.tricky_tree said:A democracy does not involve a government controlling the people, far from it. A good leader listens to the people, works with them, makes compromises if necessary. In fascist Italy, she'd have been fantastic. Pay a visit to any former mining town anywhere in the North, Scotland or Wales, look at the desolation she has caused and then come and say she was a great PMRafe said:English here. Thatcher was one of the last great idealists able to defeat those who threatened the balance of power without compromise. Powerful rulers are needed to control the people. Although she had some shortcomings, I believe her to be one of the great British Prime Ministers. Not like the pragmatists today who would bend their policies for the sole purpose of being elected or remaining in power.
Sorry for the long post.