Not any more. Brane cosmology [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brane_cosmology] recognizes our universe as one in multitudes within a larger manifold known as the bulk, though since we are unable to peer outside our own brane, what is outside the bulk is outside the scope of our speculation. Similarly, we cannot speculate much of what happened before the big bang since there's no before the big bang on our own time-axis. Events that caused the big bang (such as an intersection of branes) would have had to happen on a different time-axis perpendicular to the time of our universe, so such events would have occurred nearly instantaneously from our perspective (and our universe is instantaneous to the perspective of that time-axis.CANofKAM said:well there cannot be another universe because anything that exists or can exist is in our universe so... ya
Carl Sagan speculated in Cosmos our universe was a mere particle in a grander scheme and that universes hide in the quanta of our own atoms. I'm not sure how much M-Theory [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Membrane_%28M-Theory%29] has changed that as a possibility. We regard strings or branes as atomos (a hypothetically irreducible component), though sooner or later (probably later) we'll have to raise the question, and it remains certainly possible that deep in the fibers of strings are other universes to behold.Orks da best said:think about this:
what if our universe is marcoscopic to another one, or mircoscopic to another one.
Similarly, The Bulk (above) is beyond our reach, so we don't know whether it is infinite or a particle in an even greater system of events. So Segan's speculation (and yours) are still valid possibilities.
238U.