I allow other people to see me as I walk down the street so I don't see problems with cameras, I don't do anything wrong so it makes no difference to me.
A question for you Britons here.......
- Thread starter Saucycarpdog
- Start date
Recommended Videos
What a silly language we share, Americons and us.
Anyway, i find that i notice the cameras that cover most building corners, but i cant say that it bothers me.
The main problem seems to be the amount it costs to run and maintain and get any sort of use out of, during an age of austerity, when thousands are being made redunant, and we can't afford to be a country anymore.
We can catch the dumb criminals, at least, and it seems to work for placing a 'person' at a place at a time- which is something...i suppose.
now if only we could afford a police force.
Anyway, i find that i notice the cameras that cover most building corners, but i cant say that it bothers me.
The main problem seems to be the amount it costs to run and maintain and get any sort of use out of, during an age of austerity, when thousands are being made redunant, and we can't afford to be a country anymore.
We can catch the dumb criminals, at least, and it seems to work for placing a 'person' at a place at a time- which is something...i suppose.
now if only we could afford a police force.
Okay, the camera's aren't in your house yet, but the more prevalent they become, the more likelyhood of them being needed everywhere, including in your house.Mr Ink 5000 said:
Better?
There is when I mistype it 0mental_looney said:Sorry I will clarify that. "however it's only really an issue in larger centres of population. It's not like there are cameras on the streets of every tiny village like the one I live in. However I can only really comment for Scotland having not been really anywhere in England. Camera installations on the street are not as prevalent but are still in shops and train stations and bus stations and those kind of places."glyn said:
Oh and BTW there is no g in looney.
Just because they're not everywhere round your way at the moment, doesn't mean they won't be at some point.
If you ever feel tempted to visit London (I'd recommend against it, I went once, it rained) you'll notice them more, probably as you're not used to them.
Where do you live?Kekkles said:
Unless you're in the city centreThe Evrant Knight said:
If something happened, would you rather a burly policeman be there to sort it instantly or have to wait while the bloke in the control room gets someone on the phone, figures out who's closest and then you wait 10 minutes till they arrive. In the meantime, you're lying on the floor bleeding and your wallet and the miscreant have gone. Again, real world example from a mate.Jason Fayers said:
And no, I wouldn't trust anyone with anything sensitive as humans are incredibly fallible.
BTW if anyone see's a flashdrive with "Glyn" written on in sparkly stars, let me know
The UK is made up of 4 countries, it's not 1. But as a collective and unanimous opinion: No, it isn't a bother. I mean, it's only a real problem if you're up to no good. Right? It's like when Microsoft say they're rolling out 10,000 console bans to cheaters and hackers. You don't get worried then because you're innocent.
Being watched by a camera means nothing. I would say 70% the time nobody even see you through the camera as the footage gets overwritten by footage the following week. It's just there as a precaution for police/ security to review if somethign happened within sight of the camera.
Being watched by a camera means nothing. I would say 70% the time nobody even see you through the camera as the footage gets overwritten by footage the following week. It's just there as a precaution for police/ security to review if somethign happened within sight of the camera.
I find the question kinda funny. Everywhere in the world people are so vocal about their privacy,( even in a public open domain which is never private) but in the UK, there be camera's and people have learned to live with them.
You see, there is not a guy watching all those camera's, taking snapshots of you and watching if you have your metaphorical hand in your pants. It's for watching people that cause trouble.
The funny thing about this is, everyone always immediatly thinks the worst of it and probably blow it out of proportion. I myself find that I have no issue with camera's outside. Hell place them inside my home if you want. Not like I have something to hide.
You see, there is not a guy watching all those camera's, taking snapshots of you and watching if you have your metaphorical hand in your pants. It's for watching people that cause trouble.
The funny thing about this is, everyone always immediatly thinks the worst of it and probably blow it out of proportion. I myself find that I have no issue with camera's outside. Hell place them inside my home if you want. Not like I have something to hide.
Yes, thank you.glyn said:
I think it'd be a massive step, and need a massive amount of legislation before that could happen. But if it did, my opinon on camera's would change.
I'll keep an eye out for it, did you retrace your steps?
Frankly you soon forget about them, I also doubt a lot of them work. We just aren't that efficient.
Wait a minute, doesn't the major religion of the US have as a feature a sex obsessed, all powerful deity constantly watching you at all times?
Wait a minute, doesn't the major religion of the US have as a feature a sex obsessed, all powerful deity constantly watching you at all times?
^^^ This is a winning statement and just to add that the only time people are really concerned about security cameras is when they're doing something they shouldn't beGLo Jones said: