A Review - Super Mario Galaxy

Recommended Videos

NerfedFalcon

Level i Flare!
Mar 23, 2011
7,626
1,477
118
Gender
Male
Before anyone tries to look this up on another site, namely Gamespot:
This review was definitely written by me.

I've gone by exactly three names during my time on the Internet for the past few years. Specifically, this one, the name it was based on (x13x37x) and 'NerfedFalcon'. Both x13x37x and NerfedFalcon were originally used on Runescape, but after I gave that up I started using the names elsewhere. I also started using a corruption of the original, and that's why my username here is what it is.

Also, I've touched up this review a little, such as fixing minor typos and adding HTML effects.

With all that out of the way...
~~~~~~
Normally, at the start of a review, I'd give you a history lesson. I don't feel like doing one this time, so I'll just skip straight onto the game. Released in 2007, Super Mario Galaxy is still touted as a must-own game for the Wii, particularly for people who enjoyed games such as Super Mario 64. Why? Well, let's take a look at it. Note: this is not objective, so I might gush a bit.

Story:
The storyline is almost completely standard Mario fare: Bowser has kidnapped the Princess again, and it's up to Mario to save her. Only this time, Bowser's managed to escape to even further away than just to the castle at the end of World 8, so Mario has to get help from a mysterious woman and a bunch of star-people. And while it might sound weird, nobody ever judges Mario games on their story, right? Well, except maybe the RPGs, but that's beside the point.
No rating necessary.

Gameplay:
Love them or hate them, there's no denying that Nintendo's first-party games tend to play incredibly well, and Super Mario Galaxy is no exception to the rule. Although it takes a little while to wrap your head around platforming while the camera insists on showing Mario standing upside-down, once you do you'll find that it works really well. Funnily enough, though, my favourite parts gameplay-wise were the ones most like Super Mario 64, without the whole gravity-not-going-straight-down concept. Not that platforming at strange angles completely ruins the game - but newcomers to gaming might want to find something else first, or go as the second player while someone else does the main platforming part.
9.5/10.

Aesthetics (graphics and sound):
Just because the Wii has a less powerful processor than its contemporaries doesn't mean it's automatically got worse graphics and sound. I'll start with the graphics by saying: Staring off into space while watching Mario fly around via a Slingstar or something like one never gets old. The voice acting sort of grates after a while, particularly Mario's cry of "SUPER MARIO GALAXY!!!" on the Disc Channel, but it's possible to live with those. And as for the new sound effects, such as when you go flying about in various ways, those sound pretty awesome too. As for the soundtrack: It can be bought on a separate disc. Enough said.
8.5/10.

Replayability:
Most open-ended Mario platformers have 120 main collectables to find, and as you find them you unlock new areas to find more collectables until you have them all. Aside from having three stars in each large galaxy, there's also plenty of smaller galaxies with one star and an interesting gameplay mechanic, and there's also a lot of secret stars hidden around - some of which you can't even get until after you beat the game! Then, when you finally find all 120 stars...I won't spoil it, but let it suffice to say that it'll give you a good reason to go grab them all again.
8.5/10.

In closing:
Super Mario Galaxy is one of those titles that everyone on the Internet who's played it objectively (i.e. not me) recommends to people, not because it proves games can be an art form, but just because they're fun. But I recommend it as a fun game too, so that has to count for something!
9/10.

Rent or Buy?:
If you own a Wii, definitely buy, regardless of the price tag.
 

ThongBonerstorm

New member
Feb 22, 2010
208
0
0
By God! someone with a Time machine!

Didn't Mario Galaxy come out several years ago? and also, who will win the Stanley Cup and next Super Bowl? i could use some extra cash.

How is cheese in your time?
 

NerfedFalcon

Level i Flare!
Mar 23, 2011
7,626
1,477
118
Gender
Male
ThongBonerstorm said:
By God! someone with a Time machine!

Didn't Mario Galaxy come out several years ago? and also, who will win the Stanley Cup and next Super Bowl? i could use some extra cash.

How is cheese in your time?
Original post said:
Released in 2007...
Learn to read.
 

ThongBonerstorm

New member
Feb 22, 2010
208
0
0
leet_x1337 said:
ThongBonerstorm said:
By God! someone with a Time machine!

Didn't Mario Galaxy come out several years ago? and also, who will win the Stanley Cup and next Super Bowl? i could use some extra cash.

How is cheese in your time?
Original post said:
Released in 2007...
Learn to read.
which is my point, why are you reviewing a game from four years ago? after it's already been done a million times. You also never answered by other question, please stop being greedy.
 

NerfedFalcon

Level i Flare!
Mar 23, 2011
7,626
1,477
118
Gender
Male
ThongBonerstorm said:
leet_x1337 said:
ThongBonerstorm said:
By God! someone with a Time machine!

Didn't Mario Galaxy come out several years ago? and also, who will win the Stanley Cup and next Super Bowl? i could use some extra cash.

How is cheese in your time?
Original post said:
Released in 2007...
Learn to read.
which is my point, why are you reviewing a game from four years ago? after it's already been done a million times. You also never answered by other question, please stop being greedy.
Okay, whatever.

-Yes, Mario Galaxy came out a while ago, not that it matters that much, really.
-I don't know what the Stanley Cup is.
-Personally, I want the Packers to win again, but I really don't know.
-I don't eat cheese.

Also, I do not and have never owned a time machine. And I wrote this review because I wanted to.

That answer your questions?
 

ThongBonerstorm

New member
Feb 22, 2010
208
0
0
leet_x1337 said:
ThongBonerstorm said:
leet_x1337 said:
ThongBonerstorm said:
By God! someone with a Time machine!

Didn't Mario Galaxy come out several years ago? and also, who will win the Stanley Cup and next Super Bowl? i could use some extra cash.

How is cheese in your time?
Original post said:
Released in 2007...
Learn to read.
which is my point, why are you reviewing a game from four years ago? after it's already been done a million times. You also never answered by other question, please stop being greedy.
Okay, whatever.

-Yes, Mario Galaxy came out a while ago, not that it matters that much, really.
-I don't know what the Stanley Cup is.
-Personally, I want the Packers to win again, but I really don't know.
-I don't eat cheese.

Also, I do not and have never owned a time machine. And I wrote this review because I wanted to.

That answer your questions?
So there's no Stanley Cup in the future?!?! oh dear God in heaven why?!?!?!

also, are crackers still big there?
 

NerfedFalcon

Level i Flare!
Mar 23, 2011
7,626
1,477
118
Gender
Male
ThongBonerstorm said:
leet_x1337 said:
ThongBonerstorm said:
leet_x1337 said:
ThongBonerstorm said:
By God! someone with a Time machine!

Didn't Mario Galaxy come out several years ago? and also, who will win the Stanley Cup and next Super Bowl? i could use some extra cash.

How is cheese in your time?
Original post said:
Released in 2007...
Learn to read.
which is my point, why are you reviewing a game from four years ago? after it's already been done a million times. You also never answered by other question, please stop being greedy.
Okay, whatever.

-Yes, Mario Galaxy came out a while ago, not that it matters that much, really.
-I don't know what the Stanley Cup is.
-Personally, I want the Packers to win again, but I really don't know.
-I don't eat cheese.

Also, I do not and have never owned a time machine. And I wrote this review because I wanted to.

That answer your questions?
So there's no Stanley Cup in the future?!?! oh dear God in heaven why?!?!?!

also, are crackers still big there?
Okay, I know you're being sarcastic here, but let me just point out: I do not own a time machine, and I have never been in one.

And I assume that crackers will probably die out at the same time as all other 'regular' food.
 

Void Droid

New member
Oct 6, 2010
162
0
0
If you are looking to review on a more regular basis as something you enjoy then I don't see any reason to not share (unless there is a rule on the forum I don't know about), other than that I disagree as I stopped playing after only an hour so my review would be a little different, still I don't see why you gained the responses you did, uncalled for I'd say.
 

ThongBonerstorm

New member
Feb 22, 2010
208
0
0
Doktor Sleepless said:
This thread is now all about cheese. I would currently kill for some Wensleydale and Cranberry.
I love cheese. Tonight i had a hasburger with blue cheese and gilled onions, greatest thing ever.

OT: I feel Mario Games are too cloned, as in too many titles pass in between before you actually get anything ground breaking, and even that seems to always be several years behind. Hey! kinda like this review! Man, that was a good one, maybe I'll start time traveling/reviewing things!

Next Week: E.T. for Atari, the future of Video Gaming is in Movie tie-ins!
 

NerfedFalcon

Level i Flare!
Mar 23, 2011
7,626
1,477
118
Gender
Male
Huh. It seems I've just been given a great idea by you guys: Time Travel Reviews! Where I go back in time a few years to review games everyone else already did! And I might even get some LP in there!

(Told you I would gush a bit.)
 

DustyDrB

Made of ticky tacky
Jan 19, 2010
8,365
3
43
ThongBonerstorm said:
which is my point, why are you reviewing a game from four years ago? after it's already been done a million times. You also never answered by other question, please stop being greedy.
There's no rule saying you can't review older games. People do it all the time here. I actually enjoy more retrospective reviews.
 

kayisking

New member
Sep 14, 2010
676
0
0
leet_x1337 said:
Huh. It seems I've just been given a great idea by you guys: Time Travel Reviews! Where I go back in time a few years to review games everyone else already did! And I might even get some LP in there!

(Told you I would gush a bit.)
That´s what we´re here for mate, to annoy the heck out of you and giving you good ideas in the progres.

Ps. Please excuse my poor English, I am not a native speaker.
 

Cythros

New member
Mar 30, 2011
21
0
0
ThongBonerstorm said:
By God! someone with a Time machine!

Didn't Mario Galaxy come out several years ago? and also, who will win the Stanley Cup and next Super Bowl? i could use some extra cash.

How is cheese in your time?
How do you know the author actually owns a time machine and isn't say living in a parallel universe where time travels a tad bit slower and thus it is currently the year 2007 for her instead of 2011, where upon she manages to write a review and send it to us via network signals that traverse into our universe through some kind of wormhole? Just saying, you know.

Also, if the author of this review is currently living in the year 2007, according to your time machine claim, then shouldn't you already know what cheese is like in her point in time (assuming you have the ability to retain information beyond that of a 4-year time span)? And why am I suddenly getting the feeling that I'm reading too much into a poorly constructed and sarcastic troll attempt made by someone I not only have never met, but probably never will meet in the course of my allotted life-span?

Out of a seriousness, and to the main topic at hand, solid review. Personally, I prefer a more of an "essay" style when reading a review and less of a broken up analysis of each aspect of the game, but I found this informing nonetheless. I'll probably try Mario Galaxy out sometime, as I enjoyed playing through Mario 64. Hopefully in your reviews down the road you'll attract more "constructive" criticism from your viewers.
 

funguy2121

New member
Oct 20, 2009
3,407
0
0
leet_x1337 said:
ThongBonerstorm said:
By God! someone with a Time machine!

Didn't Mario Galaxy come out several years ago? and also, who will win the Stanley Cup and next Super Bowl? i could use some extra cash.

How is cheese in your time?
Original post said:
Released in 2007...
Learn to read.
He has a good point. Posting an old review from a few years ago doesn't seem any more logical than posting a new review of a game that's a few years old. Before you cry troll, I do have a serious question.

Why?

I did love the game, but the sequel kicked its ass.
 

funguy2121

New member
Oct 20, 2009
3,407
0
0
ThongBonerstorm said:
Doktor Sleepless said:
This thread is now all about cheese. I would currently kill for some Wensleydale and Cranberry.
I love cheese. Tonight i had a hasburger with blue cheese and gilled onions, greatest thing ever.

OT: I feel Mario Games are too cloned, as in too many titles pass in between before you actually get anything ground breaking, and even that seems to always be several years behind. Hey! kinda like this review! Man, that was a good one, maybe I'll start time traveling/reviewing things!

Next Week: E.T. for Atari, the future of Video Gaming is in Movie tie-ins!
How does one gill onions for a hasburger? I like them carmelized, but I always end up burnning them.

He did say that he didn't have a time machine in italics right after he figured out that you're being sarcastic, so maybe he was being ironic, which would be a roundabout admission that...

he owns or has at one point been in a time machine!
 

funguy2121

New member
Oct 20, 2009
3,407
0
0
leet_x1337 said:
Huh. It seems I've just been given a great idea by you guys: Time Travel Reviews! Where I go back in time a few years to review games everyone else already did! And I might even get some LP in there!

(Told you I would gush a bit.)
When you say "LP" do you mean vinyl or lady parts?
 

Cythros

New member
Mar 30, 2011
21
0
0
funguy2121 said:
leet_x1337 said:
ThongBonerstorm said:
By God! someone with a Time machine!

Didn't Mario Galaxy come out several years ago? and also, who will win the Stanley Cup and next Super Bowl? i could use some extra cash.

How is cheese in your time?
Original post said:
Released in 2007...
Learn to read.
He has a good point. Posting an old review from a few years ago doesn't seem any more logical than posting a new review of a game that's a few years old. Before you cry troll, I do have a serious question.

Why?

I did love the game, but the sequel kicked its ass.
So it's counter intuitive for someone to write a review for something if its sequel is superior? Even including the fact the previous game is older, and by reviewing it now the review feels a tad delayed, that seems to be a fairly arbitrary concept. A review for something encompasses only one's opinion on the subject matter, it doesn't have to be a medium by which others can use to find recommendations (or the opposite thereof) for it. This doesn't mean that reviews are incapable of being used as a way to find one's opinion on something before trying it out yourself, as they can be very useful in that aspect, but there's no official requirement demanding that people should only write reviews as a way of influencing the average consumer's point of view.
 

funguy2121

New member
Oct 20, 2009
3,407
0
0
Cythros said:
funguy2121 said:
leet_x1337 said:
ThongBonerstorm said:
By God! someone with a Time machine!

Didn't Mario Galaxy come out several years ago? and also, who will win the Stanley Cup and next Super Bowl? i could use some extra cash.

How is cheese in your time?
Original post said:
Released in 2007...
Learn to read.
He has a good point. Posting an old review from a few years ago doesn't seem any more logical than posting a new review of a game that's a few years old. Before you cry troll, I do have a serious question.

Why?

I did love the game, but the sequel kicked its ass.
So it's counter intuitive for someone to write a review for something if its sequel is superior? Even including the fact the previous game is older, and by reviewing it now the review feels a tad delayed, that seems to be a fairly arbitrary concept. A review for something encompasses only one's opinion on the subject matter, it doesn't have to be a medium by which others can use to find recommendations (or the opposite thereof) for it. This doesn't mean that reviews are incapable of being used as a way to find one's opinion on something before trying it out yourself, as they can be very useful in that aspect, but there's no official requirement demanding that people should only write reviews as a way of influencing the average consumer's point of view.
No, you missed my point entirely. The last statement I made was simply that 2 was much better than 1, in my opinion.

My question was why review a game that is so old that it has a year-old sequel? I didn't find any new input in the OP, so I still don't see the point.
 

Cythros

New member
Mar 30, 2011
21
0
0
funguy2121 said:
Cythros said:
funguy2121 said:
leet_x1337 said:
ThongBonerstorm said:
By God! someone with a Time machine!

Didn't Mario Galaxy come out several years ago? and also, who will win the Stanley Cup and next Super Bowl? i could use some extra cash.

How is cheese in your time?
Original post said:
Released in 2007...
Learn to read.
He has a good point. Posting an old review from a few years ago doesn't seem any more logical than posting a new review of a game that's a few years old. Before you cry troll, I do have a serious question.

Why?

I did love the game, but the sequel kicked its ass.
So it's counter intuitive for someone to write a review for something if its sequel is superior? Even including the fact the previous game is older, and by reviewing it now the review feels a tad delayed, that seems to be a fairly arbitrary concept. A review for something encompasses only one's opinion on the subject matter, it doesn't have to be a medium by which others can use to find recommendations (or the opposite thereof) for it. This doesn't mean that reviews are incapable of being used as a way to find one's opinion on something before trying it out yourself, as they can be very useful in that aspect, but there's no official requirement demanding that people should only write reviews as a way of influencing the average consumer's point of view.
No, you missed my point entirely. The last statement I made was simply that 2 was much better than 1, in my opinion.

My question was why review a game that is so old that it has a year-old sequel? I didn't find any new input in the OP, so I still don't see the point.
My apologies for not interpreting your argument appropriately. Allow me to try this again: I think whether or not there exists a "point" in reviewing something comes strictly from what the author is hoping to achieve. As mentioned earlier, a review doesn't necessarily have to be anything outside of merely expressing one's personal input on something. This means that if the author was just hoping to express his or her thoughts on something, then they should be able to write a review on anything, regardless of age or relevancy, and still have a "point" in doing so. After all, writing can be a pretty entertaining past-time.

But, in the event the author strictly wanted to sway others' opinions on the matter, then relevance and recency will definitely come into play. Though I still don't think it's entirely pointless in writing a review on something older at this point, as I'm willing to bet there are still plenty of people who haven't tried it out yet, such as myself. Most hardcore gamers most likely would have by this point, but who really needs to recommend anything to them? They're more likely to try out almost every single game that comes out anyway.

I need to work on making my posts shorter. -_-