I demand more John Crichton!
Scorched_Cascade said:
-The whole mother back and forth with Amy and Jex; we know she was a mother, we had a whole season about it and this dialogue doesn't actually teach us anything more about either character i.e. it's extraneous dialogue. Originally I thought (when he started talking) that it would be an attempt to win Amy to his side but it didn't really come off like that.
I think that entire scene was created simply for the final two lines (I'm paraphrasing here, can't remember the exact dialogue):
Amy: "What about you? Are you a father?"
Jex: "Yes, I suppose I am."
Which pretty much gave the whole plot away.
Susan Arendt said:
What's worse is that the episode dodged what could've been a very intriguing and deep question - when it came right down to it, would the Doctor sacrifice Jex if it meant saving a town full of innocents? He's more than happy to serve Jex up on a platter before Amy steps in and chastises him in a tone so condescendingly preachy that I found myself hoping she might "accidentally" find herself outside the boundary. Yes, Amy is meant to serve as the Doctor's conscience - that was established way back in The Beast Below (2010) - but as that episode also proves, she's certainly not above a dark act if it saves the greater good. She pushed that "Forget" button, right? That entire "We have to be better than him" speech came off forced and fake, something that was said not because it's how Amy would actually react but because someone had to say it or else the episode would end up about 22 minutes too short.
I was actually quite excited when the Doctor seemed to be offering Jex up to the Gunslinger. Clearly something's brewing inside him, what with the whole "Who killed all the Daleks?" "Who do you think?" line in
Asylum and the blowing up of Soloman in
Dinosaurs. I kind of like the whole, no more nonsense, pushed to the edge Doctor... but we're not really seeing any reason for it. No impending doom, no personal threat to his companions. It all just feels like misplaced anger that's never followed up on.
As for Amy... well why did she and Rory need to be in this episode? They added nothing and like you say, her intervention was nothing if not predictable and hackneyed. Blergh.
Also, is it just me or did someone not already use the: "This is why you should never travel alone." line in a previous episode? I'm thinking it was Donna but I could be wrong.
silver wolf009 said:
Maybe I'm looking too deep into it.
You are. But I would be lying if I said I wasn't completely in awe of your dedication to the continuity!