A World Without Currency

Recommended Videos

Griffstar

New member
Mar 3, 2011
268
0
0
How would such a world work? How would goverment's run? How would jobs work?
I could write a full wall of text to bore you guys, but instead I want to see your opinions on it. I personally think a world without currency would have MAJOR ups and downs but I believe we could run it smoothly after getting used to it.

I'll wait for your opinion before I write one.
Night.
 

DefunctTheory

Not So Defunct Now
Mar 30, 2010
6,438
0
0
Think Star Trek, but in real life we'd all be killing each other.

EDIT: Also, waiting for others to post is kind of a cowardish way of doing things.
 

Urgh76

New member
May 27, 2009
3,083
0
0
I have actually thought about this quite a lot myself. I always thought that we would find some way to bargain with each other, however that seems far off from the reality.

Poverty everywhere, People stealing from one another, nothing would get done from recieving nothing in return. Without a doubt millions would die from hunger as well
 

nunqual

New member
Jul 18, 2010
859
0
0
It would just go back to a barter system, but it wouldn't transfer well. There'd be a lot of nasty poverty and such while the system adjusted.
 

dslatch

New member
Apr 15, 2009
286
0
0
Simple we would be payed in services and goods.

Pros
-Wouldn't have to buy things
-Stolen wallets wouldn't matter
-The world might be like the guy who started with a pen and ended with Porche on Cregslist

Cons
-Trying to trade a lawn chair for food may get... interesting
-Bribing would get harder
-Would need larger comical cash bags for robbing banks
-it's hard to determine if a pair of pants=food
-paying for stuff online would be nearly impossible
-agreeing to mow someones lawn for a month is a pain in the ass when their lawn is the size of a soccer field and you discover that the T.V wasn't worth it.

200 000 years ago our ancestors had this same scenario.
 

Paksenarrion

New member
Mar 13, 2009
2,911
0
0
A World Without Currency: Requirements

World Peace
Unlimited Renewable Energy
Matter Teleportation Technology
Nanotechnology
Faster Than Light Travel
Colonies on other worlds
 

DefunctTheory

Not So Defunct Now
Mar 30, 2010
6,438
0
0
Paksenarrion said:
A World Without Currency: Requirements

World Peace
Unlimited Renewable Energy
Matter Teleportation Technology
Nanotechnology
Faster Than Light Travel
Colonies on other worlds
Bold for impossible, underlined for improbable, italics for world ending.
 

Khenal Baroney

New member
Nov 18, 2009
18
0
0
A world without "money" would just go back to barter, which is really just a money system with odd exchange rates. We use money because it's easier than trying to sort the value of a cow versus a tv.

To truly have no money, everything would have to be provided to anyone who wanted it. We'd all quickly become lazy and incapable of doing anything. After all, if I get my food, entertainment and anything else for free, why should I do anything?
 

WolfEdge

New member
Oct 22, 2008
650
0
0
Seeing as currency is just an agreed upon medium of exchange, not having it would simply make life more difficult.

People seem to think that money is some ultimate evil force bent on world destruction or whatever. But without it we'd just go back to trading physical goods, at which point PHYSICAL GOODS WOULD BE CURRENCY. The only way to conceivably eliminate the need for money is to effectively slaughter roughly 90% of the worlds population and then brainwash the remainder and their kin to never want for anything. Ever.

Needless to say it's an impossible task, not to mention a gross violation of human rights.


ALL PRAISE TELOGGR: GOD OF TROJANS AND KEYLOGGING!
 

DeadlyYellow

New member
Jun 18, 2008
5,141
0
0
AccursedTheory said:
italics for world ending.
Cracked has long since put the fear of Science into me. But most people just shrug off my doomsday ramblings as pro-religion propagating.
 

DefunctTheory

Not So Defunct Now
Mar 30, 2010
6,438
0
0
DeadlyYellow said:
AccursedTheory said:
italics for world ending.
Cracked has long since put the fear of Science into me. But most people just shrug off my doomsday ramblings as pro-religion propagating.
Who needs cracked to be scared of science?

In ten years, we will have technology that will have the capacity to run wild and end us all. Nanobots are particularly frightening.
 

DeadlyYellow

New member
Jun 18, 2008
5,141
0
0
AccursedTheory said:
Who needs cracked to be scared of science?

In ten years, we will have technology that will have the capacity to run wild and end us all. Nanobots are particularly frightening.
No one really, Cracked was just the conduit in which I learned about all of this. The push that got the ball rolling. Without it I could have remained blissfully ignorant of Science's endeavors to doom us all.
 

Simskiller

New member
Oct 13, 2010
283
0
0
AccursedTheory said:
Paksenarrion said:
A World Without Currency: Requirements

World Peace
Unlimited Renewable Energy
Matter Teleportation Technology
Nanotechnology
Faster Than Light Travel
Colonies on other worlds
Bold for impossible, underlined for improbable, italics for world ending.
Bu bu but TELEPORTATION WOULD BE SO CONVENIENT!

Captcha: Involve Colsil. Who's Colisl?
 

DefunctTheory

Not So Defunct Now
Mar 30, 2010
6,438
0
0
Simskiller said:
AccursedTheory said:
Paksenarrion said:
A World Without Currency: Requirements

World Peace
Unlimited Renewable Energy
Matter Teleportation Technology
Nanotechnology
Faster Than Light Travel
Colonies on other worlds
Bold for impossible, underlined for improbable, italics for world ending.
Bu bu but TELEPORTATION WOULD BE SO CONVENIENT!

Captcha: Involve Colsil. Who's Colisl?
Colsil, the Mad Scientist?

No! Do not listen to Inglip. DO NOT INVOLVE THE MAD SCIENTIST!
 

Biosophilogical

New member
Jul 8, 2009
3,264
0
0
I'd imagine it would either need a bartering system (services/goods for services/goods, which is basically what urrency does but it also institutes a middle man that allows for the transfer of value, rather than just a one-to-one transaction), or be Communism (the good kind), which requires that everyone be damn-spanking perfectly harmonious and altruistic (or close to it).
 

midknight129

New member
Apr 1, 2011
49
0
0
Keep in mind that socialism/communism isn't inherently bad. What made all large-scale attempts at it thus far bad was the manner in which it was enforced and the tendency of people to exploit the system. If A) People could use the socialist system without abusing it and B) it could be implemented willingly by self-discipline rather than governmentally and dictatorially enforced, it would not only be successful, but would go hand-in-hand with solving most, if not all, the ills in the world. This is the ideal system envisioned by Taoists; a system in which all people exist cooperatively, do what needs to be done without unnecessary complication, and each person is essentially a "country of one" governing their own actions with self-discipline and good-will.

In such a system, we would produce what is needed; not in excess or insufficiency. People would work simply out of realization that there is work to be done. We wouldn't have stores but depots where people would go to take the consumables that they need and borrow non-consumables. It would eliminate the need for redundancy (2 competing stores in close proximity, multiple brands of the same product, etc) which would drastically reduce waste and increase efficiency. Lots of redundant/superfluous jobs would be eliminated and the people-to-work ratio would be very high. A person on average would only need work an hour per week or so; those who are diligent and enjoy the work can opt to do more. Those who want to focus on abstract subjects like literature, philosophy, and art would be free to do so without the constraints or worry about dealing with a traditional job.

To achieve this state, all mankind has to do is evolve to the point that they can override the instinctual programming that compels them to be selfish in favor of a "social self-preservation" instinct that compels them to be perfectly cooperative. Many are there already and waiting for the rest. Many more have started the process for themselves. But the vast majority are either stalled at the starting line or don't even know that there IS a starting line. We won't be able to start this system until the vast majority of people are either ready or almost ready for it. Until then, we wait and deal with the world as it is now the best we can.
 

acosn

New member
Sep 11, 2008
616
0
0
Ideally? It'd probably be like startrek.

Probably? We'd gravitate back toward currency anyways. It was initially invented because a barter economy is too much of a migraine to navigate. No organized government would willingly let their subjects operate without currency and your average person wouldn't like it either. If the government didn't institute something, the people would. People like manageable values. If it wasn't a piece of paper it'd be a valuable metal. If not that a valuable commodity that everyone can appreciate, or multiple in that sense. If food was scarce something that has a strong shelf life like canned food or Twinkies would probably become currency in some form or another.

Communism has nothing to do with a removal of currency. At an ideal level it merely means that everyone is equal. At a governmental level it means the state owns all business. If they didn't print currency something like that voucher to get a loaf of bread would fill in the gaps.