Gilbert Munch said:
squid5580 said:
Gilbert Munch said:
squid5580 said:
Gilbert Munch said:
squid5580 said:
Me?? No I try and keep myself well informed on what is going on with games and have unlimited rentals at Blockbuster a few blocks away for $30 a month. I am a curious fellow and will rent a "bad" game just to see how bad it is. But someone somewhere is buying these games. Otherwise Gamestop (or reasonable facimiles) wouldn't have used copies on thier shelves. I would like to think these people are buying these games because they are rich achwhores because the alternative is quite worse.
Worse. And true. Which is why the Wii is so successful.
I dunno about that. I picture the majority of Wii only owners like gamers were back in the nes/snes days. Back when we didn't have things like a septillion reviews and other assorted information and bought our games based soley on word of mouth or how cool the box covers looked. Hell I remember buying Dragon Warrior because it had the word Dragon in the title. I was clueless on what I was getting into. I loved it but I had no idea before I bought it
Yes, but how many bad games did you buy? And, the sad fact is, that the Wii is successful in the shitty games department. I mean Carnival Games, 1 million?
That is the kicker. There wasn't really any good or bad to me at the time. There was OMFG hard and easy. Not because I was young because I was in my teens but because I was just happy to have a game to play. Ignorance is bliss.
But now we have reviews, and the really poor games are still getting high sales. Slightly off-topic... perhaps the developers should get an achievement for that
The problem is reviews have oversaturated the market. Go to IGN and look at half thier reviews. US version 6, AU version 8 (just an example but there are reviews like that there). They are the same game reviewed by 2 different people. So you go to the user reviews and pretty much get any number you want. Give me a title and a number and I would be willing to bet I could find a review that gave said title said score (round numbers and no I am really not going to

). We have a general pallette for reviewing books or movies. Sure it may not be for everyone but most people can agree this is what made this movie good or bad. Games are all over the place.
And don't forget some sites may review a game unfairly to attract more traffic. OMFG they gave GTA 4 a 7???? I must go to thier site, sign up and spam thier forums while they are rolling around naked in all that ad revenue they are getting.
And I almost forgot Victor Lucas (Reviews on the Run). He will sit there and rip a game a new one all through the review. Not say 1 positive thing about it. Then turn around and give the game a 6 or better. It takes a truly horrible game (like Chicken Shoot for the Wii) for him to give it lower than a 5.
Sorry Vic I don't mean to single you out there. I am still a fan of your shows. I just don't listen to the numbers