ACTA Passed, we failed.

[lacktheknack]

Nope, I'm keeping my nose as far away from this one as I can get it.

 

[Elvis Starburst]

So, i personally just need to know this, after reading the Reddit post and getting a good feel for it. Am I, someone who might want to travel on a flight across the border or something, at a high risk of them searching my computer and iPod? Am I going to get massively screwed every time I wanna leave the country?

 

[MattAn24]

"Oh noes, teh guvermunts iz tryin to taek awai mah toruntz n ileegul downlodes, FUCKING PANIC IN THE STREETS."

This is what you are doing. Stop it. Now. You look incredibly silly. And it's not because of your hat. It's because you're a douche.

 

[Glademaster_v1legacy]

If Ireland signed it there would have been something said on the news, So no, I don't think Ireland has signed ACTA...

Here it is. [http://www.siliconrepublic.com/new-media/item/25502-eu-countries-including/] I honestly can't believe you still actually watch the State run news it is a fucking biased joke. I also bet you heard "Swedish hackers" took down gov sites for no apparent reason and measure were put into prevent further attacks. I'm sorry but that is BS. Anon took down the site with a DDOS which is not something you can really prevent and other sites(eg Sean Sherlock's) were down for a bit from what I can safely assume was another DDOS.


There is also an article about it on thejournal.ie and the irishtimes.ie so yeah it is not like there has been no talk of it.

 

[Flac00]

Lol, dude, the treaty is about HARDWARE PIRACY, like DVD-bootlegging. This isn't SOPA. The internet will be fine.

In my eyes, ACTA is potentially worse. SOPA could have killed the internet. ACTA could kill so much more. Humans, for one thing.

Uhhh what? Seriosly, what? From what I have read up on it, it is based around the same laws we have in the US. Just don't pirate DVD's and stuff and you will be fine.

 

[Erttheking]

I'm seriously starting to think that this isn't in the same boat as SOPA.

 

[w00tage]

Until the whiners and "this is end of everything!!" whiners actually read the treaty, then I will firmly hold my belief that they're spewing unjustified hyperbole.

Do you want everyone to have free rights? I mean, beyond basic human rights; do you want copyright to be worthless? Do you want companies to not own anything? Enough is enough, of course, but without these things in place it would be anarchy. Do you WANT it to be anarchy??

These trade agreements exist for good reasons and will not impede on anyone's wellbeing or freedoms. They will only go so far as to punish those who are breaking international law. I would have thought that's a good thing. I guess people will just assume "PIPA/SOPA" being followed by this, that it's some kind of trend. It's not. ...it's really not.

ACTA basically just breaks down borders and allows international copyright and such to be truly universal. It is not censorship of the internet. It is not the end of free or fair trade. It is not SOPA. You are all blowing this waaay out of proportion. The worst part of ACTA is that it was formed behind the public's backs, but since it does so little to actually affect the public, I dunno why that's an issue. I'm sure traffic laws were formed behind our backs too. We don't complain about that, though.

Edit: why does everyone keep calling this a bill? It is a TRADE AGREEMENT. It's not being signed into legislative law. You guys are uneducated morons who'll jump at anything, are you? That's... that's disheartening. I thought we'd see some actual critical thinking being done here.

Well, even if you grant that all that is true, the real issue is whether copyright law is good in the first place. Making something bad universal for the sake of consistency is not improving the situation.

 

[w00tage]

Obama proves irreversibly and forever that he is a real piece of shit who just doesn't give a fuck and has SIGNED ACTA: http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/10/us-signs-international-anti-piracy-accord.ars

This just in, Syzygy23 proves irreversibly and forever that hyperbole is the only way to go, right away, about everything, forever.

Yes, assuredly, Obama signing a bill you don't agree with (or, possibly, understand) is proof that he is subhuman filth. There is no middle ground. He did something you (possibly) disagree with, therefore he does not give a fuck and is a real piece of shit.

Assuredly.

(you don't actually know what ACTA is or does, do you)

Obama signed into law the NDAA bill so he's definitely a piece of shit, also he's a POLITICIAN which is just a synonym for piece of shit. If you think he's you new best friend ever and that you need to rush to his add whenever he's criticized, wake up! the romance is over, he's just another pig in the white house. Democrats, republicans, both are just turds in a quickly flushing bole. Calling them a piece of shit isn't so much an insult as it is a sad fact.

Because hyperbole is the only way to discuss politics. Seriously, zero middle ground, it is absolutely necessary to leap straight to 'he is a piece of shit' every single time.

Oh and should anyone attempting to be a voice of reason dare to sound like they might possibly be defending said pieces of shit, the only logical response is to mock them.

Because reason is for suckers, I always say.

Nah, you're right. Wild, virulent hyperbole is the only way to go.

(Do I need to point out that you've misspelled words like 'aid', 'bowl' and 'your'? And that doing so sort of makes me take your wild hyperbole even less seriously? I don't really need to say that, right? That would just be tacky of me. Yeah.)

Ouch, someone really hates the word hyperbole, or loves it? Either way talking about my poor spelling cut me deep (Way to go straight for the throat "Mr. Voice of Reason"). I actually wasn't even mocking you in my last comment, I was simply disagreeing with you. Also, to imply that I think "reason is for suckers" because of the one comment I have made to you on the internet seems a little unreasonable, where is the "middle ground" you spoke of?

Now, In regards to my atrocious spelling habits lets conduct an experiment.

A. 2+2=4
B. two plus two equals four
C. tu plas tu ekwals four

Now although the spelling in sentence C is very poor(far worse in fact than my spelling errors)and is different than both A and B it's obvious correctness isn't negated by this fact. It is I think a type of shallowness and blind arrogance to completely disregard a statements meaning in light of its appearance. Readability I think is the single factor of any importance in regards to spelling, and although my spelling and grammar are far from perfect I believe it's still readable and doesn't warrant insult.

It's a question of intelligence. If you're not smart enough to know how to spell basic words, or use a spellchecker, it casts a light of general ignorance on what you say. Not to say that stupid people aren't allowed to have opinions but, well... stupid is as stupid types.

Not to get in the middle of your argument, but I just wanted to point out that spelling is a knowledge issue, not a matter of intelligence. And without knowledge of grammar, you can't proof the spellchecker's work either.

That's all I wanted to say. I now return you to your regularly scheduled argument.

 

[Nielas]

So, i personally just need to know this, after reading the Reddit post and getting a good feel for it. Am I, someone who might want to travel on a flight across the border or something, at a high risk of them searching my computer and iPod? Am I going to get massively screwed every time I wanna leave the country?

It completely depends on the laws of the country you travel to. If you just assume that the laws will be the same as in your home country, you are opening yourself to a world of hurt.

 

[Eggsnham]

I'll be glad once we all get over this annoying (and slightly hypocrtical) "dah intahnet is ehn danger the gubbement is evil" phase and maybe move on to freaking out about something else. Like those aliens. Up to something, I tell ya.

I caught one a' them sodomizing my cow.

*Random psychobabble about a shotgun*

OT: Meh.

 

[TheVioletBandit]

Obama proves irreversibly and forever that he is a real piece of shit who just doesn't give a fuck and has SIGNED ACTA: http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/10/us-signs-international-anti-piracy-accord.ars

This just in, Syzygy23 proves irreversibly and forever that hyperbole is the only way to go, right away, about everything, forever.

Yes, assuredly, Obama signing a bill you don't agree with (or, possibly, understand) is proof that he is subhuman filth. There is no middle ground. He did something you (possibly) disagree with, therefore he does not give a fuck and is a real piece of shit.

Assuredly.

(you don't actually know what ACTA is or does, do you)

Obama signed into law the NDAA bill so he's definitely a piece of shit, also he's a POLITICIAN which is just a synonym for piece of shit. If you think he's you new best friend ever and that you need to rush to his add whenever he's criticized, wake up! the romance is over, he's just another pig in the white house. Democrats, republicans, both are just turds in a quickly flushing bole. Calling them a piece of shit isn't so much an insult as it is a sad fact.

Because hyperbole is the only way to discuss politics. Seriously, zero middle ground, it is absolutely necessary to leap straight to 'he is a piece of shit' every single time.

Oh and should anyone attempting to be a voice of reason dare to sound like they might possibly be defending said pieces of shit, the only logical response is to mock them.

Because reason is for suckers, I always say.

Nah, you're right. Wild, virulent hyperbole is the only way to go.

(Do I need to point out that you've misspelled words like 'aid', 'bowl' and 'your'? And that doing so sort of makes me take your wild hyperbole even less seriously? I don't really need to say that, right? That would just be tacky of me. Yeah.)

Ouch, someone really hates the word hyperbole, or loves it? Either way talking about my poor spelling cut me deep (Way to go straight for the throat "Mr. Voice of Reason"). I actually wasn't even mocking you in my last comment, I was simply disagreeing with you. Also, to imply that I think "reason is for suckers" because of the one comment I have made to you on the internet seems a little unreasonable, where is the "middle ground" you spoke of?

Now, In regards to my atrocious spelling habits lets conduct an experiment.

A. 2+2=4
B. two plus two equals four
C. tu plas tu ekwals four

Now although the spelling in sentence C is very poor(far worse in fact than my spelling errors)and is different than both A and B it's obvious correctness isn't negated by this fact. It is I think a type of shallowness and blind arrogance to completely disregard a statements meaning in light of its appearance. Readability I think is the single factor of any importance in regards to spelling, and although my spelling and grammar are far from perfect I believe it's still readable and doesn't warrant insult.

It's a question of intelligence. If you're not smart enough to know how to spell basic words, or use a spellchecker, it casts a light of general ignorance on what you say. Not to say that stupid people aren't allowed to have opinions but, well... stupid is as stupid types.

So there has never been an intelligent person to speak broken English, or make a few grammatical errors when writing English? heaven forbid not speaking English at all! If you don't write or speak English are you technically brain dead? By the way how well do you speak and write Mandarin, Finnish or Arabic? Perfect I'm sure, otherwise your own logic would portray you in a negative light.

 

[TheVioletBandit]

Ouch, someone really hates the word hyperbole, or loves it?

hy·per·bo·le   [hahy-pur-buh-lee]
1.obvious and intentional exaggeration.
2.an extravagant statement or figure of speech not intended to be taken literally, as ?to wait an eternity.?

I am calling you lazy for using nothing but hyperbole in your comments.

I am pointing at your statements and asking you where your actual content is, because all i see is wild, obvious and intentional exaggeration with no context or frame of reference.

I'm not even seeing opinions in your comments, just hyperbole.

The opposite of content.

I actually wasn't even mocking you in my last comment, I was simply disagreeing with you.

The comment in question was:

"If you think he's you new best friend ever and that you need to rush to his add whenever he's criticized, wake up! the romance is over, he's just another pig in the white house."

And your position is that this wasn't mockery, but disagreement.

Really.

Also, to imply that I think "reason is for suckers" because of the one comment I have made to you on the internet seems a little unreasonable, where is the "middle ground" you spoke of?

The comment in question was:

Democrats, republicans, both are just turds in a quickly flushing bowl. Calling them a piece of shit isn't so much an insult as it is a sad fact.

I stand by everything I said to you.

Every word.

Readability I think is the single factor of any importance in regards to spelling, and although my spelling and grammar are far from perfect I believe it's still readable and doesn't warrant insult.

We are and will always be judged by how we present ourselves.

When you present yourself, on a pure text medium, with poor spelling and grammar, it is your own fault for how you are judged.

I stand by everything I said to you as well I guess (though I do so in a far less shitty judgmental way I suppose. Oh, and with a whole lot more hyperbole!).

 

[Rule Britannia]

This bill can't mean much. It would have been on the news, we would have had more internet blackouts and I'm pretty sure anonymous would have something to say about it too .

 

[Rule Britannia]

This bill can't mean much. It would have been on the news, we would have had more internet blackouts and I'm pretty sure anonymous would have something to say about it too .

 

[SkellgrimOrDave]

Bring in the freedom and Anarchy. They want control? They must have none.