Treblaine said:
What's the matter with exotic? Exotic is interesting, compelling and exciting!
That is not derogatory. That is not offensive.
Americana is exotic. Parisian chic is exotic. And I'm quite sure to some, English castles and country manors are exotic, this is great that people could be so interested in us.
And you know what, Africa IS exotic! They have hyenas and elephants and huge stampeding herds of wilderbeast, vast river valley and savana plains. It's an absolutely extraordinary continent...
The worst you can say is simply through a weasel pun imply it is perverse to like such things from how "exotic" as interesting and unfamiliar and "exotic" as in strip-teases are the same word. But that's two completely different meanings and only someone of extreme immaturity would try to conflate the two.
What i meant is that, if the only positive or interesting thing about Africa you can come up with is that it's "different" (BTW different from what exactly? To ppl who live here it's normal), then you should probably do more research before presenting your product. There are far better themes and issues that can best be tackled by using African countries as a backdrop: Corruption, Famine, Post-Colonial countries, severe ethnic diversities in a unified state, etc.
While it's certainly different here, it's not interesting simply because they have Hyenas and Lions, because then we might just as well use Swedish Moose as the main attraction to present Swedish culture to anyone outside of Scandinavia (or Canada). All those animals are no more a part of the cultures within Africa than in any other country, and simplifying the wonderful continent that is Africa into simply the wildlife and landscape is offensive, since you don't include the actual people. You can't have a country with borders without humans agreeing (Pretending) they're there. Constantly ignoring the actual people who live there, that make up the cultures here, is what's offensive.
The cultures here are different from western cultures, and presenting that would be interesting, and definitely something I would look forward to being presented to western game audiences. But simply presenting it as "Hey they got animals we don't", is NOT presenting interesting African cultures. It's just coming up with an animal within Africa that could replace the standard COD attack dog.
The fact that that's all they could come up with, is what pisses me (and the OP) off, they might just as well have had actual dogs, or had the level somewhere else and used dogs. If this was a rare occurrence, I wouldn't be bothered (Just one level in COD: MW3). But the fact is, Africa is a very rare topic in gaming, and even rarer is games presenting it well.
And once again you fail to address your horribly incorrect use of an an american racial stereotype, to all dark.skinned people. When in Africa, most people have never even heard of KFC, and certainly have no way of understanding this racial stereotype.
(Exactly why I don't "get" racial stereotypes. How can you claim all "black ppl" enjoy KFC, if most of them can't even afford it?)