But such a state of affairs isn't likely to last that long. People argue about the starting point of history/civilisation, but around 13,000 years ago isn't a bad guess.Treblaine said:Well that's pointless relativism as total extinction is THE WORST outcome.thaluikhain said:I disagree that it will send humanity back thousands of years, but yes, worse disaster in history.Treblaine said:Few hundreds years is still industrial age, it'll take mankind back thousands of years. Humanity wouldn't have seen a single worst disaster since the Bubonic Plague, and the earth will not have seen such a catastrophe in all of human history.
Well, depends on your point of view. It's a disaster, yes, but total extinction is much worse, IMHOTreblaine said:It's little solace that "humanity will survive" considering how hard we worked to get where we are, it will almost all be undone.
"You shouldn't be upset you lost your legs in a wood chipper, at least all off of humanity hasn't gone extinct"
And there are worse things than death, if the people who carry on humanity are sick sadistic psychopaths in a world of near endless suffering, it's a poor choice between that and death.
A few more centuries of barbarism is terrible, yes, but compared to 13,000 years, and however long humanity has to look forwards to after that, it's not that big. If mankind dies out, it has died out forever.
...
Though, that's getting rather academic and philosophical.