Aliens, why do you look so silly?

Recommended Videos

Thaluikhain

Elite Member
Legacy
Jan 16, 2010
19,538
4,128
118
Robert Ewing said:
What i'd like to see in aliens is more flaws. Humans have loads of physical flaws, why don't aliens? Why are they a perfectly evolved killing machine super-race? And we are soft little meat sacks. For a guide on how a film got aliens right, see District 9.
Argh, yes, nobody ever says "Use your outlandish human abilities!", but you'd imagine this would come up alot. Vision range, for example, assuming they even have eyes.

Also, being physically weaker than aliens really shouldn't matter that much anyway. Having claws and horns and fangs is nice and all, but may or may not impress an enemy with an assault rifle.
 

TheNaut131

New member
Jul 6, 2011
1,224
0
0
Um...okay, how about these?

Created by "Alex" or Abiogenisis at: http://abiogenisis.deviantart.com/

Description for the first picture said:
The Birrin are a sentient hexapod species from a planet approximately the size of Venus. This individual resides in the tropical region of their world, bordering the uninhabitably hot equatorial zone many birrin call the 'Kiln'. Low employment, high temperatures and generally harsh conditions mean that narcotic use is high among many of the population here.

This birrin, after ending a work cycle and with no further hive duties, uses and deals in most of the local low end narcotics. The three clasped in the beak offer an enjoyable combination of flavours when partaken together. Other mixes are stored in plain view under a strap on the head for sale or later use. As there is no substance control in this region, they can be shown in plain sight.

Addition accessories include a wrist mounted multimedia device, which feeds headphone cables to the auditory receptors at the tip of the upper two eyestalks; the device was likely traded illegally, or purchased from a wholesale shipment moving from the deep water docks on its way inland.

The Birrin are part of an ongoing project, see my gallery for more.
















I was gonna add the artist's descriptions for each pic, but decided it would be better if you went there and checked them out, along with his other work.

What do you think?

OT: My own personal gripe is with humanoid lifeforms, mainly their features. If you're just a human with blue skin and a few minor alterations, you aren't an alien. You're some guy in a bad human costume.
 

Vault101

I'm in your mind fuzz
Sep 26, 2010
18,863
15
43
Aliens can be anything

and as somone said they will look "alien"

or think about it this way, human faces look unique to us because we actually have a part of our brain devoted to recognician (with some people its broken so they cant actually remember faces)

which is why animals generally tend to look the same to us, but I imagine to other animals...
 

Arnoxthe1

Elite Member
Dec 25, 2010
3,391
2
43
Scarim Coral said:
So err which aliens you got the problem with?

If you mean Ridley Scott Aliens then blame the creator however I think they suppose to be some kind of a savage beast as oppose to be a sophisticated and sentient being.

As for alien being naked most of the time, I jsut assume their way of thinking and culture is competely different to us or maybe they are like Dr. Manhattan as they no longer feel like wearing clothes.
This. Also, how about the Crysis Aliens? I thought those were awesome aliens. AND what about these guys?

 

DoPo

"You're not cleared for that."
Jan 30, 2012
8,665
0
0
Kragg said:
one could argue that alien races, having lived on planet x for over 1000 times as long as humans might have wiped out everything else, besides pet or food, even humans would over long enough period of time start to all look alike. skintone, language, any other attribute
And I'm fine with that. However how many different species exactly have come to the exact same conclusion of their evolution and history? I don't think it would be all of them.

And some people mentioned Mass Effect...funny how I didn't find it that diverse. Note, that I've only played the first one. I didn't find the different species that, you know, different. The Krogan were one of the better depicted ones. They were, at their core, tribal societies and amongst each other when they weren't doing it against others. Also, maybe Tali's race (forgot the actual name) - they were a bot more interesting than the others. Everybody else - not so much. I could see the potential for ideas there but they weren't really developed well (maybe later games managed to built on them, though). The others were too stereotypical, perhaps. There was the possibility of so much more. Even if it was just hinted at.
 

Vigormortis

New member
Nov 21, 2007
4,531
0
0
thaluikhain said:
Vigormortis said:
Yes, that reasoning applies well for live-action films. But it doesn't really hold up for flights of fiction in general. (say, novels, video games, etc) I think that's what the OP was getting at. If not, it's what I was alluding to, anyway.
True, though live action stuff has left quite a mark on sci-fi in general...that's a subset of lack of imagination, though, same as recycling fantasy stuff in space...elves don't have 4 legs, so neither can eldar.

Vigormortis said:
I've not heard of Blake's 7. What's the gist of the program?
UK show from the 80s about a bunch of criminals on an advanced alien spaceship fighting the dictatorship that runs the galaxy. Very rarely ran into aliens, though.

Firefly has been called the modern US version, and Farscape the modern US/Australian version.
Ah. I see.

Considering I am a huge fan of Firefly and Farscape, I may well have to check out this Blake's 7. Thanks for clarifying.
 

samaugsch

New member
Oct 13, 2010
595
0
0
Lovecraft made some cool aliens, didn't he? (Yithians, Mi-go, etc.) Yeah, it probably wasn't too many, but still.
 

Don Savik

New member
Aug 27, 2011
915
0
0
Arnoxthe1 said:
Scarim Coral said:
So err which aliens you got the problem with?

If you mean Ridley Scott Aliens then blame the creator however I think they suppose to be some kind of a savage beast as oppose to be a sophisticated and sentient being.

As for alien being naked most of the time, I jsut assume their way of thinking and culture is competely different to us or maybe they are like Dr. Manhattan as they no longer feel like wearing clothes.
This. Also, how about the Crysis Aliens? I thought those were awesome aliens. AND what about these guys?

Is that the Drej from Titan AE? If so you get a cookie.

To me, Mass Effect tries with some and fails with others. Krogans, Salarians, Turians, all right, cool fine. A race of hot blue women that is both genders, can have sex with anything, and lives forever? What. The. Holy. F**k. Is. This. Shit. Its so unbelievably stupid it destroys all the credibility of the other races. How can I take the Asari seriously?

Which brings me to my next statement. Why we make them humanoid? Because we are thinking with our genetals. We like hot alien babes. Silly, but thats the BS we have to deal with.
 

Henriot

New member
Dec 15, 2011
114
0
0
Ok.. Alien game... Original X-Com (and to a lesser extent, Terror From The Deep).

Different types of aliens, all with different strengths and weaknesses that were explained through the research and autopsies you performed after facing them. And the big bestial ones were tied in as being the support for the more intelligent ones, similar to how police use dogs and horses (to bring it into human context).

The whole idea of "alien culture" not being portrayed well enough... In RPG games, where exploration and interaction with all types of people is to be expected, yes they shouldn't skimp on that. But in terms of action movies/games, where you are facing solely SOLDIERS, different cultures isn't necessary. Soldiers are usually part of an army (as humans understand them), which would imply one organisation is behind all this military activity. Military is often associated with uniforms for a reason.

And the whole clothes thing... It's been said before, we NEED clothes to survive because we don't have the capacity to warm ourselves in cold environments. But put us in the tropics and most people, even if brought up in society based around fashion, clothes and self image will probably strip some of those layers off because our bodies DO produce heat, but coupled with the temprature outside we can overheat. Who is not to say X alien can regulate their core temprature, and have evolved beyond the need of clothes?
And from psychological standpoint, without that taboo you don't feel conscious of your nudity, whereas if they aliens caught some humans with they pants literally down, humans would feel the need to cover up before finding cover.
 

Wintermoot

New member
Aug 20, 2009
6,563
0
0
you mean like in early Dr.Who or old Star Trek?
that,s mostly budget problems both where pretty small when they started out in the 60,s.
 

Triangulon

New member
Nov 20, 2009
477
0
0
DoPo said:
I am put off by a lot of depictions of aliens as well. I hate the way that most of the time aliens coming from the same planet are the same. I don't mean their image (although sometimes it is), I mean that they all speak the same language, they like the same things, they follow the exact same religion, and so on. As if the entire planet is a single country (or probably a city). You can just look to Earth and see how that model doesn't work. Sure, maybe for some aliens, it could, but when a violent warrior nation somehow manges to cooperate as a single entity, despite being ready to war over anything, it strains the credibility.

That lack of diversity happens too often, if you ask me.
I think it's worth pointing out by the time a species (even humans) is advanced enough to have developed interstellar travel or a galactic empire, the cultural lines are often extremely blurred with most individual traits becoming absorbed into a collective whole. This is something that is explored in a huge amount of sci-fi media and literature eg. The Federation (Star Trek), The Culture (Iain M. Banks), The Codiminium (Larry Niven et al) the Uplift Wars series (David Brin) and many many more.

This ignores the obvious time limitations for fims/games when it comes to exposition.
 

nuba km

New member
Jun 7, 2010
5,052
0
0
Casual Shinji said:
DoPo said:
I am put off by a lot of depictions of aliens as well. I hate the way that most of the time aliens coming from the same planet are the same. I don't mean their image (although sometimes it is), I mean that they all speak the same language, they like the same things, they follow the exact same religion, and so on. As if the entire planet is a single country (or probably a city). You can just look to Earth and see how that model doesn't work. Sure, maybe for some aliens, it could, but when a violent warrior nation somehow manges to cooperate as a single entity, despite being ready to war over anything, it strains the credibility.

That lack of diversity happens too often, if you ask me.
It's impossible to create multiple alien societies each as diverse as our own. Our own cultures have thousands of years of history backing it up, that's why a made up alien society will never feel as credible and authentic as ours. Generalized alien societies are simply one of those things where you have to suspend your disbelief.

Honestly, I'm tired of humanoid aliens period. And if they are humanoid, at least make them like 3 times our size or something.
I know why does every alien species look symmetrical and why are the aliens who are smarter then us also very fragile, and those stronger less intelligent, why can't a alien species be weaker and less intelligent or smarter and stronger? The biggest problem i have in sci-fi is that 'humans are special' and are the best solution to a problem because they are creative/will continue going no matter the odds(even when there is a warrior race who would fight till death if they were so devoted warriors)/are more understanding/can achieve what ever they want while other aliens can only be what the generalized culture is/are the best at what they strive to be (even though other species are more adapt to do it) just take your pick and mix of those and more.
 

Thaluikhain

Elite Member
Legacy
Jan 16, 2010
19,538
4,128
118
henritje said:
you mean like in early Dr.Who or old Star Trek?
that,s mostly budget problems both where pretty small when they started out in the 60,s.
The first alien species to appear in doctor who were the daleks, mind (if you don't count the dead magnetic monster or the Doctor and Susan (or TARDIS) themselves).

nuba km said:
I know why does every alien species look symmetrical and why are the aliens who are smarter then us also very fragile, and those stronger less intelligent, why can't a alien species be weaker and less intelligent or smarter and stronger?
You do get the odd Mary Sue race that's just better than humans, though rarely done that well.

Generally, they keep a sort of balance, same way they do for game character races.

nuba km said:
The biggest problem i have in sci-fi is that 'humans are special' and are the best solution to a problem because they are creative/will continue going no matter the odds(even when there is a warrior race who would fight till death if they were so devoted warriors)/are more understanding/can achieve what ever they want while other aliens can only be what the generalized culture is/are the best at what they strive to be (even though other species are more adapt to do it) just take your pick and mix of those and more.
Argh, yes.
 

Kragg

New member
Mar 30, 2010
730
0
0
DoPo said:
Kragg said:
one could argue that alien races, having lived on planet x for over 1000 times as long as humans might have wiped out everything else, besides pet or food, even humans would over long enough period of time start to all look alike. skintone, language, any other attribute
And I'm fine with that. However how many different species exactly have come to the exact same conclusion of their evolution and history? I don't think it would be all of them.

And some people mentioned Mass Effect...funny how I didn't find it that diverse. Note, that I've only played the first one. I didn't find the different species that, you know, different. The Krogan were one of the better depicted ones. They were, at their core, tribal societies and amongst each other when they weren't doing it against others. Also, maybe Tali's race (forgot the actual name) - they were a bot more interesting than the others. Everybody else - not so much. I could see the potential for ideas there but they weren't really developed well (maybe later games managed to built on them, though). The others were too stereotypical, perhaps. There was the possibility of so much more. Even if it was just hinted at.
would it make much sence for krogan, a tribal society to develop interstellar space flight? i googled their background cause i dont remember much from mass effect, they were basicly on same path as earth, except when the cold war came they actually bombed eachother, being reduced to tribal groups cause there was no other way, they got the tech boost from the salarians, the smart, spy, frail race, to fight the rachnii, the insects, (why didnt they make robots instead? *shrug*)

but you are right though not all of them would be like this, its just to make stuff simpler for sci fi. same reason most speak english, are bipedal and none are overly superior to any other race in their respective universe, only if the universe needs an overly dramatic evil powerful force, like the repaers in mass effect, those tiney droid things in stargate etc
 

Olrod

New member
Feb 11, 2010
861
0
0
E.T. phone home? Yeah... we know why you're naked when making that call. E.T. phone sex chatline more like, I bet!