Susan Arendt said:
Oh, there are plenty of Disney characters that we would simply be aghast by today, but that is less a product of Disney himself and more a product of the time in which those particular characters were created. Keep in mind, average joe folks - not Klansmen or nutjobs, but regular citizens - in the US used to be 100% convinced that blacks were born with tails. This is also a society that used to require blacks to eat at separate counters and drink from separate water fountains. So portraying them as buffoons in movies? Well, gosh, what's the big deal?
Now, obviously, we can see what the big deal is, but at the time? Not so much.
With this, I agree completely. Yes, by modern standards, the jive talking crows from Dumbo and Uncle Remus are very racist, but those stereotypes were the accepted norm at that time. The same goes for Walt Disney's anti-semitism. During his day, it was accepted. Not AS common as the others, but still a product of the society.
To consider the later Disney works(Referencing Aladdin, Mulan, or Hercules) as racist, however, is like saying any WWII game is racist against Germans.
Point of reference, however. If you see a group of crows speaking asthough they're poorly educated and using a lot of jive and you call racism, are they racist for showing it, or are you racist for labeling it as refering to a certain group of people?
Maybe crows are just poorly educated....