All Female A-Force Replaces The Avengers

Recommended Videos

Fdzzaigl

New member
Mar 31, 2010
822
0
0
I still really don't understand how the term "social justice" has now become an insult of some kind. Like... wtf.

Personally not that into superhero comics. Some of them have surprised me in a positive way before though. As for the all female cast? More chicks in tight revealing outfits = cool news for guys.
 

Phasmal

Sailor Jupiter Woman
Jun 10, 2011
3,676
0
0
Colour Scientist said:
I understand all of the childish butthurt in this thread.

I mean, when are we going to get some prominent male superheroes?

Stop pandering to the SJWs, where is he-hulk... Oh, wait...
That was fantastic.

But seriously, what the fuck guys.

We've all been a bunch of fucking negative nancies lately haven't we?
I'm really not sure what anyone hopes to accomplish by whining about this.
 

Rahkshi500

New member
May 25, 2014
190
0
0
Phasmal said:
That was fantastic.

But seriously, what the fuck guys.

We've all been a bunch of fucking negative nancies lately haven't we?
I'm really not sure what anyone hopes to accomplish by whining about this.
I haven't been as much on the Escapist for a while since last time, so I could be wrong, but it seemed like the place had became a bit less negative from what I remembered. I mean, this little event doesn't seem to be anywhere near as insane as the previous ones.
 

Mikeybb

Nunc est Durandum
Aug 19, 2014
862
0
0
I only hope a bit of time is given to Monica Rambeau.

She led the Avengers at one point, and while Wasp may be senior to her in that regard there's another important factor.
She also led Nextwave.
Next.
Wave.
Anyone who can captain that ship knows a thing or two about leadership.
 

Cecilo

New member
Nov 18, 2011
330
0
0
Phasmal said:
Colour Scientist said:
I understand all of the childish butthurt in this thread.

I mean, when are we going to get some prominent male superheroes?

Stop pandering to the SJWs, where is he-hulk... Oh, wait...
That was fantastic.

But seriously, what the fuck guys.

We've all been a bunch of fucking negative nancies lately haven't we?
I'm really not sure what anyone hopes to accomplish by whining about this.
I don't see why you and Colour Scientist seem to take it to such an extreme. Or why it has to be "One or the other", I think most men would be fine with this, if it wasn't completely replacing the regular Avengers. You can have your power fantasies, just ya know, leave ours to us. If you don't like the ones that apply to us, fine! Enjoy yours! Leave ours alone, and enjoy your new one alone. Granted it would require the Avengers having no female members since the all female team has all the women, but ya know, if that is what you want, fine. Segregated teams.
 

Paradoxrifts

New member
Jan 17, 2010
917
0
0
Colour Scientist said:
I understand all of the childish butthurt in this thread.

I mean, when are we going to get some prominent male superheroes?

Stop pandering to the SJWs, where is he-hulk... Oh, wait...
I'm more annoyed by the idea that Marvel feels they have to shelve the Avengers (however temporarily)to make way for this new A-Force. I was initially promised that increased diversity in comic books wouldn't be a zero-sum situation, and that it would lead to a larger and more diverse selection of titles to choose from and a larger and more diverse audience. So far this diversity game has abjectly failed to deliver on that promise. What has occurred instead is the widespread cannibalisation of preexisting titles, characters and concepts.

So it looks like the Marvel editorial department has decided that the only way for their vision of a more diverse Marvel universe to succeed is to kill off and/or replace as many characters as they can. That it is not enough to them to sell more comics that feature diversity, they must sell less comics about straight, white males. And that is really unfortunate, anti-consumer direction for them to take.

But what can be expected from a company that is willing to screw over their comic book reading audience because they no longer own the movie rights to particular aspects of their intellectual property?
 

Angelblaze

New member
Jun 17, 2010
855
0
0
Super Not Cosmo said:
Smells like the same kind of pandering bullshit they tried with Avengers NOW! and the whole lady Thor garbage. Marvel just seems to be tripping over themselves to show just how gosh darn diverse they are. I almost expect at this point a multi issue story arc where "A Force" battles tirelessly for equal pay and government subsidized birth control.
Smells like the same completely ignorant comic that doesn't realize marvel comics has been doing this for years with just about every social group during times of great social unrest. People just seem to be tripping over themselves to show how oppressed/upset they are.

I almost expect people to begin whining on internet forums about how this is pandering, despite their gender/group probably being pandered to for years.

On the other hand I find the crying of 'sexism' going on in this thread hilarious - one full female group and people start kicking and screaming like its the end of the world.

Most of the superheroes they have are still male.
Most of the MCU's universe is male superheroes.
Paradoxrifts said:
Colour Scientist said:
I understand all of the childish butthurt in this thread.

I mean, when are we going to get some prominent male superheroes?

Stop pandering to the SJWs, where is he-hulk... Oh, wait...
I'm more annoyed by the idea that Marvel feels they have to shelve the Avengers (however temporarily)to make way for this new A-Force. I was initially promised that increased diversity in comic books wouldn't be a zero-sum situation, and that it would lead to a larger and more diverse selection of titles to choose from and a larger and more diverse audience. So far this diversity game has abjectly failed to deliver on that promise. What has occurred instead is the widespread cannibalisation of preexisting titles, characters and concepts.

So it looks like the Marvel editorial department has decided that the only way for their vision of a more diverse Marvel universe to succeed is to kill off and/or replace as many characters as they can. That it is not enough to them to sell more comics that feature diversity, they must sell less comics about straight, white males. And that is really unfortunate, anti-consumer direction for them to take.

But what can be expected from a company that is willing to screw over their comic book reading audience because they no longer own the movie rights to particular aspects of their intellectual property?
Now this is an honestly good argument I can agree with. I want more diversity and selection as well as better written and better conceived storylines, trust me I want you guys to have that selection as well as more female heroes...and...where did all that disney money go for marvel?

I mean, have you seen the art for She-Hulk's run?
The covers are beautiful but inside it is absolutely ATROCIOUS. They managed to make one of the most beautiful female characters in the marvel universe fucking HORRIFYING to look at. (And yes, I know that whole 'non-sexualized' thing but being nice to look at isn't the same as sexualizing.)


You have no idea how much I would love to just smash together my favorite heroes as a joke in a fan art. Emma Frost, Moon Knight, Deadpool, Billy Kaplan [Wiccan], America Chavez and She Hulk....and drawn better then this. Probably. Give me two more months of practice or something.
 

Basement Cat

Keeping the Peace is Relaxing
Jul 26, 2012
2,379
0
0
My first impression was "Hrrmmmm...just how much T&A is Marvel trying to cram down adolescent boys' throats?"

Oh, well.

I haven't read comics in years because they've gotten too darned expensive. When I'm interested enough in something I usually just buy a trade paperback collection, so I won't be following this.

What I am curious about is if the writers will be bringing in token male superheroes and playing with the "token" part in-universe. It would be funny to see Peter Parker on the team--the wise cracks back and forth would have the potential to be utterly hilarious.
 

Jake Martinez

New member
Apr 2, 2010
590
0
0
Super Not Cosmo said:
Marvel is free to pander to whoever they like. It seems to be working out well for them. They've proven that you can write absolute tripe so long as the lead is some kind of token minority and the online media and a large portion of comic readers will happily eat whatever big shit sandwich of a comic you put out with a big smile on their face and ask for more because "DIVERSITY!". This all female Avengers book could be 30+ pages of stick drawings and zero dialogue and these people would still buy it and slobber on about how awesome and progressive it is because "DIVERSITY!".

I think you pretty much hit this one out of the park.

It's also annoying to me that any time you voice some displeasure at the obvious blatant pandering some people will get insanely aggressive and childish about the whole thing. In this thread we already have someone claiming that if you think this book is dumb that you're an "MRA", which is a dog whistle term they use to not just call someone an "anti-feminist" (You can be opposed to the feminist movement without being opposed to suffrage and equality - many women are), but what they really mean is that you just plain hate women. Because reasons (which can never quite be articulated).

It's really bizarre how some people gobble up this pandering crap with cult-like zeal. Hell, my wife actually thinks they are a cult. I don't know if I agree with her, but they do seem to want to turn everything into some sort of strange moralizing over the content of video games and comics. Maybe it's more like those religious guys that show up on your door and try to hand you pamphlets and talk your ear off about their God. Frankly, I think we've reached peak Political Correctness. I keep shaking my head and wondering when people will get over it.
 

VVThoughtBox

New member
Mar 3, 2014
73
0
0
Azure23 said:
Nobody bats an eye at all male teams, why are people upset about this? Imagine if people were as cynical about those teams; "God stupid marvel trying to pander to all those meninist idiots with an obviously contrived all male team, hell I bet they'll spend the entire time fighting for better treatment in divorce courts and custody cases!"

Seriously, that's how silly you people sound to me. It's not like comic creators try to shake things up every once in awhile because they're tired of catering to the shareholder mandated status quo, nope, never happens.

Also someone up above mentioned Tigra, I am similarly upset at the lack of Tigra in this image.
Quick Question: How is this new all female Avengers going to get me, the guy who doesn't read comics to pick up an issue? I have no idea who most of the super heroines in the picture are, and don't know where most of them are from. I don't know their powers, their back stories, or even why they became a super hero. I'm familiar with Rouge, Jean Grey, and Scarlet Witch from the X-Men cartoons. I don't know the rest are because I've never been exposed to them.
 

Lightspeaker

New member
Dec 31, 2011
934
0
0
Azure23 said:
Nobody bats an eye at all male teams, why are people upset about this?
As a non-comic reader, but who watches various films and plays various games related to super heroes, I'm quite curious about this comment. As I understood it MOST major "teams" had female members; even if they were majority men.

Fantastic Four, Avengers, Justice League, X-men, Guardians of the Galaxy, all have women in them. So I'm quite curious which significant teams are all male that nobody is bothered about?


On topic: looks interesting though comics aren't really my thing. Though I'm very surprised that they'd outright throw away The Avengers like that given the publicity because of the film franchise; especially given Paradoxrifts's comments that surely they should be looking to expand diversity rather than switch one bias for another? I imagine there'll be a fair few people hugely disappointed by the loss of The Avengers for the reason they've given.
 

Rebel_Raven

New member
Jul 24, 2011
1,606
0
0
Frankly, I don't have a problem with this. Barbie shouldn't be the only mainstream all girl super group we get. <.<

Looking at the huge roster, I feel like this is a tactic that gets people like me reading. Get some interesting people to get me to have a look, link them together with other characters, have me learn more about other characters via the familiar characters. Sorta like how I read wiki articles. I read, see a name that's a link, click curiously, read, find name that's a link, click curiously, ad infinit.

Fans of Rogue, or She Hulk, or Storm, or Jean Grey, or Nico, and so-forth pick up the book because they have a favorite in the story, and they get to see others that might get their attention, too.

Edit: Moreover, this showcases that the marvel universe isn't as big of a sausagefest as most believe creating a showcase of assorted female characters, gives female characters an attempt to shine and break free of the dismissive nature of their worth (Pretty certain this thread's proof the sentiment exists), and hopefully frees them of being boyfriend drama and drama fodder.
It's easier to find a favorite when there's a lot of options.

Also, honestly, I don't think ego (for the lack of a better term) would allow for a long standing token guy to be shown up constantly by women, not have romantic relations with the women, etc, etc. Basically a very strong role reversal.
 

mecegirl

New member
May 19, 2013
737
0
0
Skatologist said:
Also from the nerdist:
This is a big step up from previous attempts at an all-female comic like Marvel Divas, which tried to force well known Marvel heroines into a a Sex and the City-style framework
Marvel, you tried to do that? With your kickass female heroes?!?!

Oh man... I forgot that book and how much I hated it.
 

Hyperstorm

New member
Nov 27, 2013
61
0
0
Yeah, um, thanks for effort Marvel, but I've finally removed myself from my abusive relationship with you so I won't be coming back for this or any of the other $#!+ you'll most likely be throwing against the wall.

I'm with Image now. We will always have the back issues.
 

CrystalShadow

don't upset the insane catgirl
Apr 11, 2009
3,829
0
0
MrFalconfly said:
CrystalShadow said:
MrFalconfly said:
I'm looking forward to the day when a character being of a certain gender isn't newsworthy.

Seriously. An all female superhero team shouldn't be a sensation. It should just be one more in the pile.
That it is just shows for just how long the reverse must've been going on, that this can be considered a rarity.

Oh well, seems we have to go through the motions of swinging the pendulum completely the other way before this ever really gets balanced out and stops being a thing anyone even cares about...
Yeah sorry.

I just have the opinion, that gender should never ever be a reason for something to be awesome. If someone sites their own gender as a reason to hire/vote/support them, then I wont as a matter of principle.

If they site capabilities or work-experience (or even just promise of something awesome), then sure. But I'm not gonna support someone just because they happen to have a particular part of sexual characteristics.

In short. I think for something to be accepted as normal, you should try and use it as a reason to pick you out of the bunch.

EDIT:

I'll give you an anecdote as an example.

Once I was in a group whose purpose was to elect representatives who should take care of some party.

A woman who applied for one of the posts sited her "being a woman" as a reason for us to vote for her. I didn't. Not because she was a woman, but because I thought you should use previous experience as a reason to be voted in, not your gender.
Yeah, I get you. But more often than not this stuff gets held against you, and other stuff.

Besides, what you're saying has rarely been true when it comes to groups that are historically under-represented.
People find reasons why them being a woman (or black, or middle-eastern or whatever) is a good reason NOT to include them.
That's happened for many many decades, if not centuries. Just because it isn't admitted to openly doesn't mean it isn't happening.

Let's look at an example of the very subject we're talking about

We get an all-female superhero team, and look at the discussion. Some people make a big deal about how great it is it exists, others complain about it's existence, immediately leaping to the conclusion that it only exists for the sake of being a team of women.

Nobody on one side cares if there were better male characters around, and on the other side nobody even considers the possibility that these characters have some innate merit beyond simply existing for the sake of being a team full of women.

Meanwhile, if we had a team full of men, would we be having this conversation? It would be taken for granted that the team members were chosen for some innate merit. We wouldn't even be asking if there maybe were other candidates who were better getting (silently) excluded for not being men.

That's where this stuff gets to be a problem. Nobody remarks on or questions why a team full of men exists.
But oh no!, a team full of women can't possibly exist except for some bizarre 'equality' reasons, and not, say for reasons that are basically the same as how all-male teams happen.

It's one of those things.

We won't really be equal until neither point is worthy of mention.

And what you're saying, while understandable, isn't there either. Because rather than just accept an all-woman team, you appear to be finding reasons to question it's existence.

In other words, you're pushing back at the concept of it as if it's something weird or exists for questionable reasons.

Would you be doing that if they had announced (another) all-male team? Would it even occur to you to question whether this was based on merit?

That's why we are where we are. Because a 'team full of women' is still a note-worthy thing that everyone (including people that claim they believe in 'choosing things on merit') feels the need to comment on as though it's something special or unusual somehow.
(Whether it's saying it's a good thing or a bad thing, you're still talking about it in a way you more than likely wouldn't do if the genders were reversed)

We have a long road ahead of us it seems. Pushing back like this just perpetuates the status quo. It does nothing to remove the basic cause as to why this is noteworthy in the first place.

So now we have a swing in the opposite direction of usual (all male becomes all female), which likely happened for cynical reasons, and is being resisted for equally cynical reasons.
If this keeps up, all that will happen is we'll end up back where we started and start the process all over again.
It will never really resolve the underlying issues.

When it's no longer worth mentioning (either in a positive OR negative manner) that an all-female superhero team exists, that's when this will be over.
But otherwise, we just get perpetual arguments...
 

Teoes

Poof, poof, sparkles!
Jun 1, 2010
5,174
0
0
Gentlemen, we must fight this diversity at all costs! No more ground must be conceded to the frilly menace! Fight back! Fight back!

Umm, your manly men comics aren't being taken away. These comics don't come with a forced dose of chemical castration. If you don't like the look of this, don't read it. What's the big fucking deal?
 

rosac

New member
Sep 13, 2008
1,205
0
0
It's a little bit heavy handed, but I can see what they're doing. Hopefully they integrate the "mainstream" avengers and this team afterwards, which would actually be more diverse than what they're currently doing whilst bringing in more lesser-known female characters.

I also believe that this may be purely a business decision- many of the male characters in marvel are well known and well read, but female characters are... less so. There's fewer female led titles in marvel, so this could be a test to see which female characters are popular and who to give their own titles.
 

Colour Scientist

Troll the Respawn, Jeremy!
Jul 15, 2009
4,722
0
0
Paradoxrifts said:
lead to a larger and more diverse selection of titles to choose from and a larger and more diverse audience. So far this diversity game has abjectly failed to deliver on that promise. What has occurred instead is the widespread cannibalisation of preexisting titles, characters and concepts.

So it looks like the Marvel editorial department has decided that the only way for their vision of a more diverse Marvel universe to succeed is to kill off and/or replace as many characters as they can. That it is not enough to them to sell more comics that feature diversity, they must sell less comics about straight, white males. And that is really unfortunate, anti-consumer direction for them to take.
Actually, it probably comes from a more cynical point of view that an all-female cast of relative unknowns competing against their standard male-dominated bread and butter characters wouldn't sell very well. I seriously doubt it comes from any genuine intent to cull the "straight, white males."

It's a temporary switch of focus in one of Marvel's products. I'm actually staggered by the "stay away from our stuff, get your own" responses. I mean, I don't understand how people can be so insecure in the fact that not every single Marvel product is trying to exclusively cater to them at this present moment in time and that a temporary change is bringing on the SJW Pander-pocalypse.

There's no big killing off or cannibalisation of characters, their doing a trial run with an all-female cast as a one-off. I honestly don't get the big fucking deal. It's not "anti-consumer" to try to temporarily appeal to another group of consumers that isn't you.
 

Dragonlayer

Aka Corporal Yakob
Dec 5, 2013
971
0
0
Fanghawk said:
Dragonlayer said:
Isalan said:
I forsee literally no backlash or disgusted comments dripping with anger and irony coming from this decision.

OT: Top left, is that Mrs. Iron Man (Iron Woman?). I ask in all seriousness, I'm not overly familiar with the Marvel Universe, and I have no idea who that is.

Captcha: Market forces. So cynical captcha.
I'm both furious *and* disgusted that this team isn't called the Femvengers.

OT

That cosmic entity standing next to She-Hulk seems like she might be a tad overpowered: can someone nerdier than me in this area fill me in with the juicy details?
Shinkicker444 said:
Curious about this one as well. That the Mrs Universe someone else mention?
Captain Universe. an extra-dimensional power that possesses individuals (right now, a woman) and makes them a superhero during major crisis events. It wouldn't surprise me if she's the one who pulls the A-Force together.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Captain_Universe
Hmmm! Benevolent possession eh? I might be interested in that: can anyone whose read their exploits vouch for the quality?