I said before, and I will say it again, Half Life 3 is the new Duke Nukem Forever. I was never a fan of the series, but I do feel bad for them. It's like when Viewtiful Joe 3 was cancelled and Clover disbanded from Capcom.
Don't think anyone's begging them for it. Maybe a handfull.WeepingAngels said:People still begging for Half-Life 3 are so pathetic that Valve just ignores them now. Really though, Valve is shit, I bet if people had whined as much to Square Enix about another game in the Chrono franchise as they did to Valve about getting HL3, we would have a new game in the Chrono franchise.
The problem is that NONE of those series are finished. You could argue that Left 4 Dead was never really meant to have an end point, but the second game revealed some interesting story points about the four heroes, and it was pretty clear they were going to give us more in the next game.Poetic Nova said:Eh, doesn't mean L4D2, or Portal 1 and 2 suddenly dissappear. Or Half Life 1 and expansions for that matter. I stil play those games fondly.
On the cliffhanger ending of Episode 2:Sniper Team 4 said:The problem is that NONE of those series are finished. You could argue that Left 4 Dead was never really meant to have an end point, but the second game revealed some interesting story points about the four heroes, and it was pretty clear they were going to give us more in the next game.Poetic Nova said:Eh, doesn't mean L4D2, or Portal 1 and 2 suddenly dissappear. Or Half Life 1 and expansions for that matter. I stil play those games fondly.
And while Chell's adventure seems to be over, and thus possibly Portal as a whole, it's still really easy to make more in the series especially considering Chell is now outside and quite possibly going to run into beings from the Half-Life story now.
And as for Half-Life itself, well...you play those games still. You've seen that horrible ending in Episode 2.
Yeah, those games haven't disappeared and they're still all really amazing, but they also serve as not only a painful reminder of what Valve was once, but also as a reminder that we are never going to see them concluded.
The final mission, when you need to cross the bridge, you are on the radio with the military. They start asking if the four characters are carriers or whatever. They respond by saying that they're not infected, and the military stresses that they don't want to know that, they want to know if these people have come in contact with infected and not turned. When the military finds this out, they suddenly become very driven to get those people out of there, but never explain why. To me, this implies that there was supposed to be another game, perhaps one dealing with a chance to find a cure. But all we get is a cutscene of a helicopter taking off and then credits.Ezekiel said:I wonder what you're talking about with the four heroes having interesting stories that needed to be expanded. If there's another L4D, I want it to have an original cast of main characters.
And those are.....not videogames?B-Cell said:that full fledge SP game could be VR game like the lab, could be browser game.
I cant believe in 2017 people still believe valve are video game developers or valve will make Half life 3.
The problem with DNF (and A:CM) was not inherent to the concept of finishing a long and troubled development cycle (though expectations added fuel to the inferno). The problem was a managing director who saw it as an opportunity to procure funds for his company's branded projects.CoCage said:Snip
Don't worry, i am not implying that HL3 will be bad or worse than those two God awful title, but at this point, it is replacement of a game that should have been out years ago, but for some reason or another, the creators sit on their asses and do nothing. Or the publisher/developers keeps switching developers do the job for them; in the case of DNF & A:CM. So in essence, HL3 has taken on that mantle in a way.PainInTheAssInternet said:The problem with DNF (and A:CM) was not inherent to the concept of finishing a long and troubled development cycle (though expectations added fuel to the inferno). The problem was a managing director who saw it as an opportunity to procure funds for his company's branded projects.CoCage said:Snip
As for HL3, it can still happen. It may not have the original crew aboard but that doesn't mean it'll be terrible or won't happen. The point is to be creative with the concept you have an understanding and appreciation of, not to just have worked on it for a long time or since the beginning.
Well yeah, I wasn't trying to say that it was the same company, lol. But I don't think it would hurt Steam or their profits much if they just sat down for a gentle chat to explain that HL3 isn't happening and why.AD-Stu said:I agree there are still plenty of people who remember those "golden days", but being able to remember those days doesn't mean they're still the same company with the same priorities.Lilani said:...there are still enough people who remember the golden days of Valve seeming like the only dev who gave a shit about making good games that this doesn't feel like a full betrayal yet.
That company had to make good games to make a profit. This one can just gorge itself on Steam profits.