It's naive quackery at best, and a concious attempt to fraudulously profit from the suffering of others at worst, and anything in between.
jimahaff said:
I'm not defending all non-European medical practices, some of it is a load of horse crap. I just don't like the idea that it's o.k. to ignore anything that didn't come from Europe.
Except that what you say is untrue from A to Z. It's bashed because it doesn't work, not because of where it's from. Not only does it not work, it hurts and occasionally kills people, and a great many species are on the endangered species list because of 'oriental medicine'.
I can also name you a specific example: bloodletting and prayer were both part of European 'medical practise' back in the day, if you can call it medical at all. Yet both were rigorously kicked out of medical science, despite of being European. How do you explain this if it's all about European vs non-European as you said?
jimahaff said:
I am actually a college student, and one of my internationally known professors told me about this. so ya jokes on you.
And who's that professor? What's his field of study?
Powereaver said:
if its one less trip under the knife or put on horrible drugs to fix something then ill do it... ive had a couple of things fixed by alternative medicine in the past and they were the same things that modern medicine had absolutely no idea how to fix or what they were.
Considering you would be the first succesfull cure ever in history by quackery, that just screams for an explanation and elaboration.