Eh. It would be awfully depressing to be sympathetic to everyone's suffering. It never ends, and crying about it doesn't help anything.FluxCapacitor said:While I see what you're saying, I find the idea that it's an evolutionary trait to be an easy out. Sure, our minds can't take in all the sadness in the world so we have to compartmentalise stuff, but that doesn't mean it doesn't ever register. I find it saddening that there are so many people who sound like they didn't even feel a twinge of concern and sympathy, and I can only put it down to the rising tide of narcissism in today's society.
I cared about Katrina, and about Haiti, and about Pakistan, and about Christchurch. Did I let it take over my life? Not at all. Was I able to spare the time I was watching the news to feel bad for the victims of these tragedies? Absolutely. It isn't that hard to develop a sense of empathy - evolution as a species takes a long time, but you can evolve as a person by questioning these basic tendencies and trying to be better.
I'm all for people who want to contribute to the relief effort, however they want to do it, but asking people to be sad about it is kinda ridiculous. Not only will it never happen, if for no other reason than the makeup of the human brain, but you're basically asking people to be depressed forever, and that's just not very nice.