Am I wrong to want this girl to be punched in the face?

[Signa]

Sounds like the reason I don't date. Well, I don't really care about getting laid all that much, but the headache and heartache that comes with females just isn't worth the benefits of companionship.

Oh come on that's just silly. As if this girl is supposedly representative of all girls. Or as if girls are generally going to be troublesome.

You call it silly, I call it practical. Most of the single girls around me are like this, or have other issues that would irk me all the same.

Being wrong about girls causing headaches or being similar to that girl based on limited, and probably biased, experience isn't being practical by any stretch of the imagination. I doubt you even know most single girls around your area.

where are you from? I'm dealing with some very self-entitled Seattle girls here.

What nonsense is that? Asking where I'm from? That's quite irrelevant because no point I made was dependent on my location.

Actually, sub-cultures play an important role on the demeanor of an individual. Unless you're implying that all I need is a vagina to get what I need from a girl...

Are you reading some other posts, or did it totally go over your head that my point had nothing to do with sub-cultures and that sub-cultures do not affect the point in any manner? Are you trying to imply that you cannot read my posts? Because my point was that your experience is limited and likely biased. But then you go off like some tinfoil hat wearing madman trying to act as though I said something else.

ok, let's recap then:
I said: girls suck.
you said: nuh-uh!
I said: Around me they do.
You said: You're wrong because I don't think you know girls.
I asked: what girls are around you?
You said: irrelevant.
I said: people are different from place to place. (The girls you know may not suck compared to the ones around me)
you said: I don't think you're understanding me.

Sound about right? I think I'm understanding you just fine. Now since you've singled me out as a forever-alone loser, would you like to enlighten me about how fucking sweet your girlfriend is? I really hope you have a great one, because I don't know why the hell you'd bother with this conversation otherwise.

 

[Signa]

Sounds like the reason I don't date. Well, I don't really care about getting laid all that much, but the headache and heartache that comes with females just isn't worth the benefits of companionship.

Oh come on that's just silly. As if this girl is supposedly representative of all girls. Or as if girls are generally going to be troublesome.

You call it silly, I call it practical. Most of the single girls around me are like this, or have other issues that would irk me all the same.

Being wrong about girls causing headaches or being similar to that girl based on limited, and probably biased, experience isn't being practical by any stretch of the imagination. I doubt you even know most single girls around your area.

where are you from? I'm dealing with some very self-entitled Seattle girls here.

What nonsense is that? Asking where I'm from? That's quite irrelevant because no point I made was dependent on my location.

Actually, sub-cultures play an important role on the demeanor of an individual. Unless you're implying that all I need is a vagina to get what I need from a girl...

Are you reading some other posts, or did it totally go over your head that my point had nothing to do with sub-cultures and that sub-cultures do not affect the point in any manner? Are you trying to imply that you cannot read my posts? Because my point was that your experience is limited and likely biased. But then you go off like some tinfoil hat wearing madman trying to act as though I said something else.

ok, let's recap then:
I said: girls suck.
you said: nuh-uh!
I said: Around me they do.
You said: You're wrong because I don't think you know girls.

Not what I said. So is the issue being able to read my posts then? Or is it some kind of pathetic attempt to deny the idea that one person's experience is going to be bad evidence for making such broad claims about people by changing my words?

Sound about right?

No.

I think I'm understanding you just fine.

You demonstrated that you didn't.

Now since you've singled me out as a forever-alone loser, would you like to enlighten me about how fucking sweet your girlfriend is?

You're the one that called yourself that, not me. You sound bitter, which is all the more reason to think that your personal experience has a bias to it.

I really hope you have a great one, because I don't know why the hell you'd bother with this conversation otherwise.

Interesting. So the only reason someone could possibly want to correct attacks on people is if one of those people is their girlfriend? What an odd way to think.

I'm still waiting on you to deliver your point here. You keep saying I'm not understanding you, so would you please spell it out a little more since my thick brain can't comprehend your meaning? Just merely telling me that I'm wrong isn't really an argument.

 

[Strain42]

Are you wrong to want her to be punched in the face? No.

You'd be wrong if you actually...y'know...did it. But there's nothing wrong with some harmless wanting

I want a million dollars, I'm not gonna go robbing banks.

EDIT: I wanna make a special note that this was my...ONE THOUSANDTH POST!!! -confetti-

...I'm a little let down by this.

 

[Robert Ewing]

Go ahead. People deserve a good punch in the face every now and again. This seems like one of those situations.

 

[Elementary - Dear Watson]

I came to inform you that it is never wrong to want to punch a woman in the face.

Joking aside, she probably does deserve to get hit by a truck. Well maybe she doesn't deserve that, but I would still laugh.

Yes, maybe just a light crippling.

OT: Weeeellp, hopefully someone they know will hear and he'll be like "DUUUUUUUDE!" and he'll be like "what's up, BRO!?"

I've been paying too much attention to Barney on How I Met Your Mother...

Phew. For a second there I thought someone was quoting Jersey Shore. I didn't want to have to kill.

Again.

:|

You think that's bad? There's a British version of that show called Geordie Shore. Apparently I went too far when I stated that the cast were all justification for abortion...

...Now I don't want to live on this planet.

Its even worse when you find out that is one of 3 British Jersey Shore-esque programmes... Geordie Shore, The Only Way Is Essex, and Made in Chelsea...! Its abysmal... Not only that, the original of these programmes The Only Way Is Essex (or TOWIE as the media calls it) actually won awards... The only redeeming factor is that on IMDB it only has 3.6*s! Where as the delightful Sherlock has 9.1*s! Fuck you delinquent, Sun reading population of the UK![footnote]I read the Sun myself, when the other papers are taken... but only because Dear Diedry is the best page ever, and the crossword is pretty good, not too hard, but not as easy as the Daily Mail's... oh, and I don't pay for them![/footnote]

 

[Signa]

Sounds like the reason I don't date. Well, I don't really care about getting laid all that much, but the headache and heartache that comes with females just isn't worth the benefits of companionship.

Oh come on that's just silly. As if this girl is supposedly representative of all girls. Or as if girls are generally going to be troublesome.

You call it silly, I call it practical. Most of the single girls around me are like this, or have other issues that would irk me all the same.

Being wrong about girls causing headaches or being similar to that girl based on limited, and probably biased, experience isn't being practical by any stretch of the imagination. I doubt you even know most single girls around your area.

where are you from? I'm dealing with some very self-entitled Seattle girls here.

What nonsense is that? Asking where I'm from? That's quite irrelevant because no point I made was dependent on my location.

Actually, sub-cultures play an important role on the demeanor of an individual. Unless you're implying that all I need is a vagina to get what I need from a girl...

Are you reading some other posts, or did it totally go over your head that my point had nothing to do with sub-cultures and that sub-cultures do not affect the point in any manner? Are you trying to imply that you cannot read my posts? Because my point was that your experience is limited and likely biased. But then you go off like some tinfoil hat wearing madman trying to act as though I said something else.

ok, let's recap then:
I said: girls suck.
you said: nuh-uh!
I said: Around me they do.
You said: You're wrong because I don't think you know girls.

Not what I said. So is the issue being able to read my posts then? Or is it some kind of pathetic attempt to deny the idea that one person's experience is going to be bad evidence for making such broad claims about people by changing my words?

Sound about right?

No.

I think I'm understanding you just fine.

You demonstrated that you didn't.

Now since you've singled me out as a forever-alone loser, would you like to enlighten me about how fucking sweet your girlfriend is?

You're the one that called yourself that, not me. You sound bitter, which is all the more reason to think that your personal experience has a bias to it.

I really hope you have a great one, because I don't know why the hell you'd bother with this conversation otherwise.

Interesting. So the only reason someone could possibly want to correct attacks on people is if one of those people is their girlfriend? What an odd way to think.

I'm still waiting on you to deliver your point here. You keep saying I'm not understanding you, so would you please spell it out a little more since my thick brain can't comprehend your meaning? Just merely telling me that I'm wrong isn't really an argument.

Amazing. Since when is "Personal experience is insufficient to make broad claims about people" just telling you that you're wrong? It's telling you why with a very obvious truth. Plus of course bias. If, as it seems by your words, you're a terribly bitter person who can't find a gf, your interpretation of events is likely to be biased and perhaps looks for negative aspects of situations over others.

The only thing amazing here is how far you're reading into my words. I'm not bitter one little bit. I take full responsibility for not having a girl. It's my fault! But that doesn't change the fact that girls have let me believe that they are either selfish, oblivious, plain old stupid, insane, or any combination of those.

Don't get me wrong: I know ALL girls are not like that. Through my years of posting here I've noticed Erana has a nice brain between her ears (though she just lost a faction point for getting butthurt about a generalization in this thread). My best friend's fiance is about as far from the girl stereotype that's lodged in my brain. There's a girl at my work that has never shown an ounce of ditsy airheaddedness that another co-worker shows on a daily basis. Hell, she even has a dark sense of humor about things, which is REALLY hard to find in a girl.

You know, that's a BIG issue I take with females. I love to joke and make fun of things. If I can't make it funny somehow, it's probably not worth my time. Girls love to take humor as a sign of immaturity, as well as the desire to just have fun. Girls will tell you that video games are a waste of time, simply because THEY think it's boring. Girls don't try to compromise, and have to have it their way.

Bottom line, while I have my preconceptions, I still stay as open-minded as I can. Your statements about me are ill-founded and have done little to change my mind about the girls around me. It's not like I don't take notice when a girl is behaving like a normal person (like that co-worker). Maybe it would help if girls would bother to police their out-of-control sisters, but instead I get to watch things like this:


Anyway, that's a rant for another time, because girls (using the word as a generalization as I have for this whole post) aren't really like that, but you knew that already. I'll tell you what, if you know any girls in the Seattle area that can prove me wrong, send them my way. But until I see even a simple majority of girls behaving like upstanding people, I'm going to keep my narrow-minded views.

 

[triggrhappy94]

That's bad, and kind of a bad idea for a radio show--the trying to catch people cheating part.

But after listening to the radio show (which is syndocated across the US) I listen to in the morning, I learned that Valentine's Day makes women into entitled whores. A couple days before Valentine's Day, their chat room topic was "Have you ever stuck with someone through Valentine's Day just for a gift?" and almost every woman who called in complained about how the gifts they recieved was got worth their company. There was one preticular woman complaining about how she went on a date with a guy who had just gotten out of an asylum and how the teddy bear he gave her was not worth her time.

What you're going to realize is that people are awful.

 

[Signa]

Sounds like the reason I don't date. Well, I don't really care about getting laid all that much, but the headache and heartache that comes with females just isn't worth the benefits of companionship.

Oh come on that's just silly. As if this girl is supposedly representative of all girls. Or as if girls are generally going to be troublesome.

You call it silly, I call it practical. Most of the single girls around me are like this, or have other issues that would irk me all the same.

Being wrong about girls causing headaches or being similar to that girl based on limited, and probably biased, experience isn't being practical by any stretch of the imagination. I doubt you even know most single girls around your area.

where are you from? I'm dealing with some very self-entitled Seattle girls here.

What nonsense is that? Asking where I'm from? That's quite irrelevant because no point I made was dependent on my location.

Actually, sub-cultures play an important role on the demeanor of an individual. Unless you're implying that all I need is a vagina to get what I need from a girl...

Are you reading some other posts, or did it totally go over your head that my point had nothing to do with sub-cultures and that sub-cultures do not affect the point in any manner? Are you trying to imply that you cannot read my posts? Because my point was that your experience is limited and likely biased. But then you go off like some tinfoil hat wearing madman trying to act as though I said something else.

ok, let's recap then:
I said: girls suck.
you said: nuh-uh!
I said: Around me they do.
You said: You're wrong because I don't think you know girls.

Not what I said. So is the issue being able to read my posts then? Or is it some kind of pathetic attempt to deny the idea that one person's experience is going to be bad evidence for making such broad claims about people by changing my words?

Sound about right?

No.

I think I'm understanding you just fine.

You demonstrated that you didn't.

Now since you've singled me out as a forever-alone loser, would you like to enlighten me about how fucking sweet your girlfriend is?

You're the one that called yourself that, not me. You sound bitter, which is all the more reason to think that your personal experience has a bias to it.

I really hope you have a great one, because I don't know why the hell you'd bother with this conversation otherwise.

Interesting. So the only reason someone could possibly want to correct attacks on people is if one of those people is their girlfriend? What an odd way to think.

I'm still waiting on you to deliver your point here. You keep saying I'm not understanding you, so would you please spell it out a little more since my thick brain can't comprehend your meaning? Just merely telling me that I'm wrong isn't really an argument.

Amazing. Since when is "Personal experience is insufficient to make broad claims about people" just telling you that you're wrong? It's telling you why with a very obvious truth. Plus of course bias. If, as it seems by your words, you're a terribly bitter person who can't find a gf, your interpretation of events is likely to be biased and perhaps looks for negative aspects of situations over others.

The only thing amazing here is how far you're reading into my words. I'm not bitter one little bit. I take full responsibility for not having a girl. It's my fault! But that doesn't change the fact that girls have let me believe that they are either selfish, oblivious, plain old stupid, insane, or any combination of those.

Don't get me wrong: I know ALL girls are not like that. Through my years of posting here I've noticed Erana has a nice brain between her ears (though she just lost a faction point for getting butthurt about a generalization in this thread). My best friend's fiance is about as far from the girl stereotype that's lodged in my brain. There's a girl at my work that has never shown an ounce of ditsy airheaddedness that another co-worker shows on a daily basis. Hell, she even has a dark sense of humor about things, which is REALLY hard to find in a girl.

You know, that's a BIG issue I take with females. I love to joke and make fun of things. If I can't make it funny somehow, it's probably not worth my time. Girls love to take humor as a sign of immaturity, as well as the desire to just have fun. Girls will tell you that video games are a waste of time, simply because THEY think it's boring. Girls don't try to compromise, and have to have it their way.

Bottom line, while I have my preconceptions, I still stay as open-minded as I can. Your statements about me are ill-founded and have done little to change my mind about the girls around me. It's not like I don't take notice when a girl is behaving like a normal person (like that co-worker). Maybe it would help if girls would bother to police their out-of-control sisters, but instead I get to watch things like this:


Anyway, that's a rant for another time, because girls (using the word as a generalization as I have for this whole post) aren't really like that, but you knew that already. I'll tell you what, if you know any girls in the Seattle area that can prove me wrong, send them my way. But until I see even a simple majority of girls behaving like upstanding people, I'm going to keep my narrow-minded views.

I was simply taking issue with the absurd generalization. It's inaccurate and somewhat rude really.

But really, saying that you take notice when a girl is behaving like a normal person? Just... really? You don't see the problem with a statement like that? =|

Not really because I have my justifications. All these threads about feminism that we've had around here always state one thing: Women are equal to men. If they are really equal, I mean REALLY equal, then "normal people" should mean both men and women acting in the best interest of everyone around them.

I am not trying to say that women are not equal to men, but they are different. It's those differences I've latched onto, because many of those differences are completely irresponsible when looked at from the greater picture. A healthy society can not have one class of citizen being given unfair treatment against another. Women are given free passes in most of their wrongdoings at one point or another. I'm talking about the small civil disputes like in the OP ranging up to unfair child custody cases or the uncommon (but still too frequent) spousal murder/dismemberment. It's the same with the wealthy right now, since all you have to do is say "I'm rich" and they let you off the hook(or in Paris Hilton's case, both wealth and woman cards were played).

 

[Frozen Donkey Wheel2]

Oh no, stupid people exist.

I'm sorry, but what else is there to say? So some people aren't exactly paragons of humanity. That's just the way things are and-Wait, WHAT the fuck? How did this thread get to be about fucking SEXISM??!! What, because it involves a woman being a *****, we have to have some kind of obligatory discussion just to make sure we understand that not all women are bitches?

I don't know what to say. What do you think, David Tennant?

 

[kortin]

Sounds like the reason I don't date. Well, I don't really care about getting laid all that much, but the headache and heartache that comes with females just isn't worth the benefits of companionship.

Oh come on that's just silly. As if this girl is supposedly representative of all girls. Or as if girls are generally going to be troublesome.

You sir/ma'am are an intelligent human being and I salute your ability to use logic.
/salute

On topic: Uh. I dunno, she pisses me off, but really, wishing harm on another person is kinda silly to do. After all, we don't have genies or anything, might as well just punch em in the face yourself.

 

[Bomberman4000]

No need to get your hands dirty, because with the attitude she seems to have about things, life will eventually punch her in the face.

She's probably also one of these girls who downs Valentine's Day while still expecting to be pampered and shit. What a brat.

 

[alandavidson]

Oh this just made me laugh. People do some really odd things for "love" though. I knew a girl who had a boyfriend who kept cheating on her. Her answer to that was to make him buy her expensive gifts to "make up for it". It was bizarre to say the least.

OP: Most girls aren't like the one you talked about. There are some, and we have a TV show about them. It's called Jersey Shore.

 

[artanis_neravar]

I just want to share this because this was a total, I don't want to live on this planet anymore, moment.

So I'm driving to class, WBLI Radio station blasting. The annoying Radio show hosts announcing they want to help people that had a shitty valentines day that think their significant other is cheating to call in and they'll expose them. So the ***** Radio show host and her, well male-cohort with a lisp has this girl on the phone. Girl on the phone got Mary-Kate and Ashley Olsen perfume (which she hated) for valentines day, saw the guys credit card charge behind his back... turns out, homeboy orders flowers. Girl has Guy-With-Lisp pretend to be the flower company making a costumer satisfaction call.

Long Story short, the flowers where for her, delivered the day after valentines day at her job... which she called out of to try to catch the guy cheating.

The girl is COMPLETELY unapologetic about her suspection, arguing that (and I'm quoting) "It's stupid to give someone flowers the day after valentines day anyway" and "Maybe he'll learn in the future."

***** radio show host asks, upon being told by the girl she'll stop by her job to collect the flowers ("Since their going to be dead in a couple days anyway") "So you have a job where you can just show up whenever you want?"

Girl responds "Actually, I work for my father, and I hate it, so I do a bad job on purpose..."

Remove Chivalry from the equation, if you believe in it, this person is a disgusting human being am I right?

(The link is http://feeds.wbli.com/~r/ToCatchACheater/~5/epVrLMSOjH4/valentine_s_day_flowers_101479511.mp3 if you want to listen)

You think thats bad? I was listening to the radio probably a month ago, and this girl called in freaking out because she took her nephew to the doctors, and while there saw his blood type. Now she notices his blood type isn't the same as his fathers (father was A and the kid was O) and is planning on telling her brother (the father) that the kids isn't his and his wife cheated on him. And the radio host lady agreed with her. That's right they were going to ruin this poor guys life because they had a poor grasp on hereditary traits

 

[artanis_neravar]

Oh this just made me laugh. People do some really odd things for "love" though. I knew a girl who had a boyfriend who kept cheating on her. Her answer to that was to make him buy her expensive gifts to "make up for it". It was bizarre to say the least.

OP: Most girls aren't like the one you talked about. There are some, and we have a TV show about them. It's called Jersey Shore.

My ex broke up with me because I, and this is a direct quote "can't spoil [her] the way [she] deserves" and this was a month and a half after I graduated college, with an engineering degree, and was having trouble finding a job.

 

[Woodsey]

Sounds like the reason I don't date. Well, I don't really care about getting laid all that much, but the headache and heartache that comes with females just isn't worth the benefits of companionship.

Because she is representative of all of the women. ALL OF THEM!

snip

Nice, say you know you're going to be called a sexist, so you can pull out the "I told you so," card, and even play up the victim angle a little later on.

'We have steered our women into feelings of self entitlement and to be completely selfish while ignoring others feelings.'

Alternatively: we don't treat women as if they're beneath us, meaning they get to express their own personalities, meaning some of them are dicks, just like men.

(I also like the idea that they're being steered, helpless as they are, bless them.)

'Now I actually don't even blame the women for this'

How very noble of you.

'Women are being more and more geared towards that very type of behavior in the original post while men seem to be getting less "manly" for a lack of a better word and simply just putting up with it.'

Indeed, it was much better when we took charge and told them how to feel and behave (or, y'know, slapped them around a bit for doing something wrong - the good old days!).

'If you want to see a good and decent woman go where life isn't easy in the world.'

Yeah, people are generally a little less concerned with First World Problems in places where they have greater struggles. Strange, that.

Your post, particularly the middle paragraph, is like something from the 50s. Women should admire us for all the things we do for them, they should be in awe of us, they should sing our praises from the mountain tops, they should appreciate how easy and carefree us men - who struggle bitterly and eternally for them - make their lives.

Blah blah blah.

No, I'm going to call your comment sexist because you just said that most women in my life, myself included, is an ungrateful ***** because of where I'm from.
Oh, and I get bonus ***** points for my being a young woman!

How about you *gasp* get to know people before declaring them entitled and selfish?
Is that really to much to ask?

Quick, she's not expressing blind gratitude! Get her!