An Interesting Illegal Immigrant Case

Recommended Videos

GrandmaFunk

New member
Oct 19, 2009
729
0
0
RJ 17 said:
And that doesn't really matter since you were making a general statement of "illegal immigrant" is an invalid term since they're not doing anything illegal. You asked for proof that it was a crime, and I delivered it to you.
Hum, No. I originally asked what specific crime(s) Jose Manuel Godinez-Samperio had personally committed, since his case is what is being discussed.

My comments regarding the validity of using the term "illegal immigrants" was simply trying to correct the assumption some had that attaching that label to him implied that Mr. Godinez-Samperio had in fact broken a law.
 

RJ 17

The Sound of Silence
Nov 27, 2011
8,687
0
0
GrandmaFunk said:
RJ 17 said:
And that doesn't really matter since you were making a general statement of "illegal immigrant" is an invalid term since they're not doing anything illegal. You asked for proof that it was a crime, and I delivered it to you.
Hum, No. I originally asked what specific crime(s) Jose Manuel Godinez-Samperio had personally committed, since his case is what is being discussed.

My comments regarding the validity of using the term "illegal immigrants" was simply trying to correct the assumption some had that attaching that label to him implied that Mr. Godinez-Samperio had in fact broken a law.
Alright, then it's your turn. Show us the part of the code that says Title 8 Section 1325 doesn't apply to minors.
 

Bebop

New member
Apr 22, 2012
54
0
0
He hasnt been a law abiding citizen his whole life, hes an ILLEGAL immigrant. Therefor he has been breaking the law his whole life.
 

Lucem712

*Chirp*
Jul 14, 2011
1,472
0
0
Alright, let's lay down some information. Illegal immigrants do pay taxes. Sales, property and income. (Because if they are working, they are doing so under a fake SS #)

I compiled the following information to
education both myself and others about the process/cost
of naturalization in the united states.


[li]You must be 18 years of age to apply for citizenship/Naturalization[/li]
[li]You must be a legal resident* for 5 years before applying for citizenship[/li]

[li][sub]During this time, you may not leave the US for more than 30 months or you are disqualified[/sub][/li]
[li][sub]You must also be a resident of your state for at least 3 months[/sub][/li]
[li][sub]You must be of 'good moral character'[/sub][/li]
[li]Males must have registered to the 'Selective Service'[/li]
[li][sub]Or submit a form of why they have not registered[/sub][/li]
[li]You must have a basic/intermediate knowledge of English[/li]
[sub]*Legal Residency refers to a 'green card'[/sub]

[source] [http://www.uscitizenship.info/ins-citizenship-process.html]

1. Submit Your Complete Application

Complete and print your U.S. Citizenship application form on USCitizenship.info
Obtain two approved passport-sized photos
Collect all required supporting documents
Ensure each of these documents is properly completed and/or translated
Mail your application package to the correct USCIS location
Apply for U.S. Citizenship


[HEADING=1]Citizenship Finger Print[/HEADING]​

2. Get Fingerprinted

Receive an acknowledgement letter from the USCIS that they received your application
Go to the fingerprinting location specified in the letter from the USCIS on the scheduled date and time to get your fingerprints taken
Send any additional documents to the USCIS that they may have requested in the letter


[HEADING=1]Citizenship Interview Exam[/HEADING]​

3. Attend USCIS Interview & Take Tests

Receive an interview appointment letter from the USCIS
Go to the interview location specified in the letter from the USCIS on the scheduled date and time for the interview
Bring identification and any additional documents that the USCIS may have requested in the letter
Answer interview questions about your application and background
Take the English & Civics Tests
Await a decision from the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
Get U.S. Citizenship Test & Interview Guide


[HEADING=1]USCIS Citizenship Oath[/HEADING]​

4.Take the Oath to Become a U.S. Citizen

Receive a ceremony date letter from the USCIS
Check in at the ceremony location specified in the letter from the USCIS on the scheduled date and time
Return your Permanent Resident Card
Answer questions about what you have done since your interview
Take the Oath of Allegiance
Receive your Certificate of Naturalization
Enjoy your new life as a United States Citizen!

[source] [http://www.uscitizenship.info/ins-citizenship-process.html]

[HEADING=3]Green Card[/HEADING]​
$365. (Add $85 biometric fee for a total of $450, where applicable.)

[HEADING=3]Filing Fee[/HEADING]​

Most applicants for U.S. citizenship pay $595 when filing Form N-400, the application for naturalization.

[HEADING=3]
Biometric Fee[/HEADING]​

In addition to the basic fee, applicants under 75 years of age must pay a biometric fee, which covers the cost of fingerprinting and other expenses. This fee comes to $85 as of December 2010. Adding $85 to the filing fee, your total due comes to $680.

[HEADING=1]Total
[sub][sub][sub][sub]with Green Card[/sub][/sub][/sub][/sub][/HEADING]​
[HEADING=2]$1,130[/HEADING]​

[sub]*Exemptions are made for current/former military members[/sub]

[source] [http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.eb1d4c2a3e5b9ac89243c6a7543f6d1a/?vgnextchannel=dd346d26d17df110VgnVCM1000004718190aRCRD&vgnextoid=dd346d26d17df110VgnVCM1000004718190aRCRD]

[source] [http://www.ehow.com/info_7752668_much-cost-become-citizen.html]
 

manic_depressive13

New member
Dec 28, 2008
2,617
0
0
I generally think immigration laws are bullshit. Becoming a citizen is an expensive, lengthy process, and in many cases impossible. My teacher claimed to have a friend who adopted a child from overseas but was not allowed to bring him into the country because he had a hair-lip and our government didn't want to pay for it.

I also have a family friend who used to work for the immigration department. His job was to go to people's houses and say "Sorry, you have to go back to your country now." In many cases these were people who had either come here as children or as young adults and had basically lived their whole lives here. As far as they were concerned, this was their country. But nope, apparently living here for thirty five years, obeying the laws of the country and paying your taxes isn't enough to make you a citizen. My friend ended up quitting because he couldn't deal with the guilt.
 

solemnwar

New member
Sep 19, 2010
649
0
0
Bah, to me, immigration laws seem silly, although I suppose there's a point to them, in that we don't want to have a fuckton of homeless people... but once upon a time there wasn't really any sort of law against people packing up and leaving to go to another country, was there? I think the only thing stopping people would be language barriers and not wanting to risk being homeless...

I don't know, I'm not really well-versed in immigration laws. I just know that immigration is all that's keeping the population of Canada (where I live) up since our birthrate is technically in the negatives at last check.

Maybe someone more knowledgeable than I can tell me more about immigration laws.
 

Guardian of Nekops

New member
May 25, 2011
252
0
0
solemnwar said:
Bah, to me, immigration laws seem silly, although I suppose there's a point to them, in that we don't want to have a fuckton of homeless people... but once upon a time there wasn't really any sort of law against people packing up and leaving to go to another country, was there?
Once upon a time, people were owned by their feudal lords. You weren't even allowed to leave your town without permission, let alone your country.

Of course, if you go back before government of any sort that's a different story, but taxes and tarrifs on people moving around go back rather a long way.

If you have a population that pays taxes and is entitled to certain rights as a result, you as a government have a vested interest in knowing who is in your country so that you can collect those taxes. If one of those rights you provide is safety, you have a vested interest in knowing more about these people... being sure they aren't spies for hostile powers, being sure they aren't murderers or other sorts of criminals fleeing other states, etc. As a result, people have been keeping track of immigration for a while.

Now, if what I've learned in Economics is correct, the situation between the United States and Mexico is unfortunate and was avoidable. Basically, recent treaties between our nations simultaneously destroyed the profitability of agriculture in Mexico (previously their main export to the United States and other places) and the profitability of the manufacturing industry in America, which was a major source of US wealth. Various corporations are mainly profiting, are responsible for lobbying for the treaty, and have therefore displaced large numbers of citizens of both countries, resulting in the immigration problem.

However, our problem is systematic, and it needs a systematic solution... no amount of subverting our current system on a case-by-case basis will resolve anything.
 

Schadrach

Elite Member
Legacy
Mar 20, 2010
2,324
475
88
Country
US
RJ 17 said:
UPDATE: Kinda on a side-note, but I felt like updating my OP with it. But according to the way the oral arguments went in regards to the controversial Arizona immigration law, the supreme court seems to be siding with the state on the most controversial part: police being able to ask to see someone's documents if the police have good reason to believe that the person is in the country illegally.
See, I have a problem with police being able to do that for a simple reason -- if one is born a citizen, then one is not required to carry any proof of that fact, nor are they required to carry ID on their person at all times. So, this becomes a law to target brown people with no ID on hand, rather than illegal immigrants. To compare, I have a family member who is a German immigrant, and I somehow doubt they would bring him in under this law if he was without ID.

Dags90 said:
If he doesn't have any family member or an employer willing to sponsor him (and good luck finding legitimate employment as an undocumented immigrant), it's pretty much impossible to become a permanent resident, much less a citizen.
I really hate whoever came up with "undocumented immigrant" being a better word to describe these people than "illegal immigrant." It's a word choice made specifically to make it sound like a case of misplaced paperwork, rather than a matter of having violated the law. It's f%&*king NewSpeak.

What's next, when someone commits a home invasion can we just start calling them "unexpected guests"? Burglary as "visitation by an undocumented acquisitions specialist"?