And so Peta strikes again,,, in my country at least

Recommended Videos

Antonio Torrente

New member
Feb 19, 2010
869
0
0
katsumoto03 said:
steevee said:
Eugh. PETA.

They are the worst. Just the worst thing. Damn near every animal they 'rescue' they put down within weeks.
I dunno about that man. Lest we forget the WBC.

OT: Meh. PETA's full of douchebags, but at least they're harmless and are sticking up for something they believe in. Their cause makes sense, they just have... Peculiar methods.
like protesting while in nothing more than cabbages covering their bodies.
 

Valdrec

New member
Jan 18, 2011
12
0
0
I understand the point which PETA are trying to make, but they often end up doing something really stupid, like beating someone up for having a burger or something.

Like not to say All PETA are bad people, or misguided, but a large number of them seem to be extremists.

Vegetarian extremists.
 

lacktheknack

Je suis joined jewels.
Jan 19, 2009
19,316
0
0
Veldie said:
lacktheknack said:
If they actually said they "condone" Janet's endorsement, then they've REALLY failed.

At any rate, at least they're harmless. They're allowed to do stuff like that, I say let them go for it. It won't change a thing, but at least they'll feel better.
They are not harmless look into some arson related stuff involving them
THIS GROUP was harmless, so I have nothing against them. Just because some twat set buildings on fire doesn't mean the entire group sets stuff on fire.
 

Fetzenfisch

New member
Sep 11, 2009
2,460
0
0
standokan said:
My opinion is first we stop HUMANS from dying alot, THEN we help animals.
Well we do have way more humans than tigers....not that peta is doing much in that direction. They cant throw paint at stars for murdering tigers...well a certain pair of magicians perhaps
 

Thaluikhain

Elite Member
Legacy
Jan 16, 2010
19,538
4,128
118
Father Time said:
In temrs of being attention whores ... they're on pretty much the same level
Well, as an activist group, they sort of have to get all the publicity they can for their cause.
 

CarlMin

New member
Jun 6, 2010
1,411
0
0
CrazyCapnMorgan said:
People for Ethical Treatment of Animals.

If we could manage ethical treatment for HUMANS, we wouldn't have as much of a problem with ethical treatment of animals.

However, one is entitled to their opinion, no matter how ill-informed.
What exactly are you implying? Humans suffer, yes, but i still think animals generally suffer more. In the western world alone, more cattle are slaughtered in the meat industry every year than the number of humans killed during the genocide. I'm a hypocrite. I do support many animal right's group but i eat meat. But I still don't think a human life should be valued over that of an animal, just because it's a humans life.

In this case, i agree with Peter Singer. In suffering, animals are our equals.
 

newwiseman

New member
Aug 27, 2010
1,325
0
0
They don't want any products that are even produced with the labor of animals, because the treatment all the abused immigrant workers picking their fruits and vegetables doesn't matter at all.

Damn hypocrites that sponsor terrorism, all of them.
 

Chefodeath

New member
Dec 31, 2009
759
0
0
Antonio Torrente said:
Tonight February 4, 2011 is the start of Janet Jackson's concert tour which start here in my country the Philippines.

Then out of nowhere 10 members of Peta's Philippine division who dressed as Grim Reapers protested outside the the place where the concert will take place and said that they condemn Janet's endorsement of Furs there in the US.

Fortunately it didn't hamper the success of the concert.

I don't know about you guys, but these is one of the reasons why I can't take Peta seriously (wherever country they are), they are just trolls, attention seekers, much like those bastards from WBC.

Everyone listen to this guy. He hit the nail right on the head.
 

Garrsus

New member
Jun 21, 2010
170
0
0
its when people are being murdered we should worry.
silly peta.
they may never learn.
 

CrazyCapnMorgan

Is not insane, just crazy >:)
Jan 5, 2011
2,742
0
0
CarlMinez said:
CrazyCapnMorgan said:
People for Ethical Treatment of Animals.

If we could manage ethical treatment for HUMANS, we wouldn't have as much of a problem with ethical treatment of animals.

However, one is entitled to their opinion, no matter how ill-informed.
What exactly are you implying? Humans suffer, yes, but i still think animals generally suffer more. In the western world alone, more cattle are slaughtered in the meat industry every year than the number of humans killed during the genocide. I'm a hypocrite. I do support many animal right's group but i eat meat. But I still don't think a human life should be valued over that of an animal, just because it's a humans life.

In this case, i agree with Peter Singer. In suffering, animals are our equals.
It isn't that I believe humans have more value in life than animals - to the contrary, I believe that all of us, from the smallest insect to the largest mammal, have equal value in life and in love. The sad fact, though, is that we treat each other with such disregard that it is almost impossible to treat anything else better than ourselves. Sure, there are humans that take this kind of suffering quite seriously, and some take this issue with an equal amount of compassion and intelligence (something quite lacking in most things we, as humans, deal with). However, as a collective species, when you view human history for what is was and has gradually become, we have despoiled most of everything we touched and we treat our home, and all that live on it, with the utmost of contempt. I'll let someone else, who influenced my way of thinking quite profoundly, do the talking.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eScDfYzMEEw
 

emeraldrafael

New member
Jul 17, 2010
8,589
0
0
I never got the whole thing about furs. But hten again, I have furs from animals that are very plentiful (deer, fox, wolves [though they died of natural causes], rabbits) that I asked a friend of my family to make into some clothes for me. Nothing's warmer in the winter then a deer skin pants and jackets lined with wool/fleece (whatever you get from sheep that you want to call the lining of a jacket).

I mean, I can kinda see where PETA is coming from but I think they seriously need a nice tall class of "this is the real world". Though they're definitely not on the level of the WBC. To my knowledge, PETA never wished death on someone and was actually serious about, or told other people that the person deserved to die because they wore furs. But the WBC leader said recently that Australia's most recent hardships were deserved, hope they got more, and said that entire land was a sing against god.

I know, it makes it hard to be religious with things like that happening.
 

CarlMin

New member
Jun 6, 2010
1,411
0
0
CrazyCapnMorgan said:
CarlMinez said:
CrazyCapnMorgan said:
People for Ethical Treatment of Animals.

If we could manage ethical treatment for HUMANS, we wouldn't have as much of a problem with ethical treatment of animals.

However, one is entitled to their opinion, no matter how ill-informed.
What exactly are you implying? Humans suffer, yes, but i still think animals generally suffer more. In the western world alone, more cattle are slaughtered in the meat industry every year than the number of humans killed during the genocide. I'm a hypocrite. I do support many animal right's group but i eat meat. But I still don't think a human life should be valued over that of an animal, just because it's a humans life.

In this case, i agree with Peter Singer. In suffering, animals are our equals.
It isn't that I believe humans have more value in life than animals - to the contrary, I believe that all of us, from the smallest insect to the largest mammal, have equal value in life and in love. The sad fact, though, is that we treat each other with such disregard that it is almost impossible to treat anything else better than ourselves. Sure, there are humans that take this kind of suffering quite seriously, and some take this issue with an equal amount of compassion and intelligence (something quite lacking in most things we, as humans, deal with). However, as a collective species, when you view human history for what is was and has gradually become, we have despoiled most of everything we touched and we treat our home, and all that live on it, with the utmost of contempt. I'll let someone else, who influenced my way of thinking quite profoundly, do the talking.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eScDfYzMEEw
Well, i certainly misjudged you. :)
And yes, George Carlin is a bit of a genius really, though i dont always agree with his controversial opinions.
 

BanthaFodder

New member
Jan 17, 2011
774
0
0
PETA has actually euthanised perfectly healthy animals. so yeah, basically a "you're better off dead than living in this MAN'S world..." state of mind... also, they have this HUMONGOUS HQ building... nice digs for a ninprofit organization, eh? I have sworn that, should I see a member of PETA on the street, I will rush to a McDonalds, buy a huge ass Angus burger, run back, and totally OM NOM NOM right in their stupid face. these people make me sick. any organization telling little (think like kindergarten age) kids that Daddy will kill their dog/cat/THEM if he goes fishing is just bullshit... not to mention throwing buckets of fake blood on schoolchildren... seriously, FUCK PETA. every time they do some stupid shit, I eat an animal product. in other words, I eat animal products every day PETA continues to exist.
 

Nouw

New member
Mar 18, 2009
15,615
0
0
I'm not a fan of fur and in fact I would sign a petition against it (although that's as far as I would go >.>) but I'm not quite sure if P.E.T.A. is the best organization to fight fur.

I mean fur does make many species extinct which to be frank pisses me off. *Shakes head in disgust.
 

BanthaFodder

New member
Jan 17, 2011
774
0
0
as my badass German teacher said:
"I wanna kill Bambi... mak him into a nice pair of pants! and I'll turn his friends into some soup"
"but Bambi doesn't have any friends!"
"NOT ANYMORE, CUZ I KILLED THEM ALL!"