Ani-Chan

Recommended Videos

RhombusHatesYou

Surreal Estate Agent
Mar 21, 2010
7,595
1,914
118
Between There and There.
Country
The Wide, Brown One.
Daystar Clarion said:
EverythingIncredible said:
Truth Cake said:
EverythingIncredible said:
You expect me to buy a game

The fact that you don't realize how wrong it is to date disabled folks makes me even more worried.

Because I am sure our future generations would be TICKLED PINK to be blind or have short arms.
No, I don't expect you to buy it, because that would imply that you spent something- the download on the website's free, I was making joke about how you couldn't spend too much on it because it's free...

And frankly, I'm worried that you apparantly think that it's wrong for normal people to find love in a disabled person just BECAUSE they're disabled and on no other criteria... so please, explain to me how dating a disabled person is 'wrong' to you, because apparantly I don't understand.
Because by doing so, you're polluting the gene pool with undesirable traits.
Huh, didn't know people were still into eugenics.
And apparently believe there's a genetic cause for things like house fires and car accidents...
 

Truth Cake

New member
Aug 27, 2010
205
0
0
EverythingIncredible said:
Yes...that's what romance is for...

It's to find someone whose traits are desirable enough by your standards to reproduce with.

That's how humanity works. Why else would I keep myself out of dating?
Yeah, because actually caring for someone for reasons outside of conceiving offspring and reproduction and liking them as a person and NOT just a child-producing partner or whatever is just... inconceivable, isn't it? I didn't realize humans HAD to be so robotic and logical and have no form of emotional attachment whatsoever.

So maybe this visual novel isn't for you, since you seem to have little or no concept of 'love'. Sorry for wasting your time.
 

BeastofShadow

New member
Jun 29, 2009
174
0
0
EverythingIncredible said:
Truth Cake said:
EverythingIncredible said:
Why would you date if you aren't going to have children?

And ever heard of a carrier? Just because their immediate children don't have it doesn't mean that their kids won't either?
Well, certainly not because you care about them and actaully enjoy their company as more than just friends- no, children are the ONLY reason to pursue a romantic relationship with someone at all.
Yes...that's what romance is for...

It's to find someone whose traits are desirable enough by your standards to reproduce with.

That's how humanity works. Why else would I keep myself out of dating?
I feel the need to point out not all disabilities are genetic and these types of sweeping statements are insanely in considerate to both people who have been in domestic accidents (car wrecks ect..) and people who have taken combat injuries (loss of limbs from a landmine or IED for example). So my question to you is are those people not allowed date and reproduce because they are disabled?
 
Dec 14, 2009
15,526
0
0
RhombusHatesYou said:
Daystar Clarion said:
EverythingIncredible said:
Truth Cake said:
EverythingIncredible said:
You expect me to buy a game

The fact that you don't realize how wrong it is to date disabled folks makes me even more worried.

Because I am sure our future generations would be TICKLED PINK to be blind or have short arms.
No, I don't expect you to buy it, because that would imply that you spent something- the download on the website's free, I was making joke about how you couldn't spend too much on it because it's free...

And frankly, I'm worried that you apparantly think that it's wrong for normal people to find love in a disabled person just BECAUSE they're disabled and on no other criteria... so please, explain to me how dating a disabled person is 'wrong' to you, because apparantly I don't understand.
Because by doing so, you're polluting the gene pool with undesirable traits.
Huh, didn't know people were still into eugenics.
And apparently believe there's a genetic cause for things like house fires and car accidents...
Maybe there's a genetic predisposition of inflammability? :D
 

darksakul

Old Man? I am not that old .....
Jun 14, 2008
629
0
0
EverythingIncredible said:
Truth Cake said:
h to not only make a game out of it, but to localize it too...
Ah, clever! You judge the game's content without even having played it to see the actual content of the game for yourself (although I suppose the word 'game' is a pretty poor category to put it under, it's a visual novel...)
Most people would call that 'prejudice' or something of the like, some others might call it 'efficiency'! I'm in the former group, of course. You should really actually play it- it's not like you're going to spend too much money on it :)

OT: Hilarious, although even if they made a Vader arc just for giggles, I don't think I'd go for it...

Wait a second... Darth Vader, an obviously male character, in a female schoolgirl outfit? IT'S A TRAP! *crowd boos*
You expect me to buy a game

The fact that you don't realize how wrong it is to date disabled folks makes me even more worried.

Because I am sure our future generations would be TICKLED PINK to be blind or have short arms.[/quote]
Its not that dating someone with a disability is trendy, the main message is to look pass the superficial physical limitation in these individuals and see them for the person they are inside.
 

Madara XIII

New member
Sep 23, 2010
3,369
0
0
Mathak said:
Irradiated Tiger said:
Well that was...unexpected.

What personality would Vader-chan have anyway?
I'm guessing she'd be Tsundere.

'S-stupid r-rebels...it's not like I'm blowing your p-planet up b-because I l-like you or anything!'
Pffft bwahaha is it wrong I read that in the voice of Vader while imagining him blushing and biting his thumb!?


.....I think I need help
 

BeastofShadow

New member
Jun 29, 2009
174
0
0
EverythingIncredible said:
BeastofShadow said:
I feel the need to point out not all disabilities are genetic and these types of sweeping statements are insanely in considerate to both people who have been in domestic accidents (car wrecks ect..) and people who have taken combat injuries (loss of limbs from a landmine or IED for example). So my question to you is are those people not allowed date and reproduce because they are disabled?
Of course?

If they were desirable enough genetically then that wouldn't have happened to them in the first place.
Are you honestly telling me that if you are unlucky enough for some asshole drunk driver to plow into your car and for your injuries to lead to amputation that it was your fault for not having good genetics? Or if on a morning commute your train got derailed and a similar situation occurred it would be your genetics fault?
 

Hal10k

New member
May 23, 2011
850
0
0
BeastofShadow said:
EverythingIncredible said:
BeastofShadow said:
I feel the need to point out not all disabilities are genetic and these types of sweeping statements are insanely in considerate to both people who have been in domestic accidents (car wrecks ect..) and people who have taken combat injuries (loss of limbs from a landmine or IED for example). So my question to you is are those people not allowed date and reproduce because they are disabled?
Of course?

If they were desirable enough genetically then that wouldn't have happened to them in the first place.
Are you honestly telling me that if you are unlucky enough for some asshole drunk driver to plow into your car and for your injuries to lead to amputation that it was your fault for not having good genetics? Or if on a morning commute your train got derailed and a similar situation occurred it would be your genetics fault?
Damn train derailment gene. Should've been bred out a long time ago. How did we even develop it before trains even existed? Explain that, evolutionists!
 

Weaver

Overcaffeinated
Apr 28, 2008
8,977
0
0
EverythingIncredible said:
BeastofShadow said:
EverythingIncredible said:
BeastofShadow said:
I feel the need to point out not all disabilities are genetic and these types of sweeping statements are insanely in considerate to both people who have been in domestic accidents (car wrecks ect..) and people who have taken combat injuries (loss of limbs from a landmine or IED for example). So my question to you is are those people not allowed date and reproduce because they are disabled?
Of course?

If they were desirable enough genetically then that wouldn't have happened to them in the first place.
Are you honestly telling me that if you are unlucky enough for some asshole drunk driver to plow into your car and for your injuries to lead to amputation that it was your fault for not having good genetics? Or if on a morning commute your train got derailed and a similar situation occurred it would be your genetics fault?
1. Reaction time

2. Your ability to pay attention to the road.

You're telling me your genes wouldn't play a part in that?

There's no such thing as luck.
You're entirely failing to take into account the other person. When I got into a car accident it's because someone at their stop sign decided "hey, I'll just not look to my left and pull out."

Fun Fact: a car going at 65km/h cannot magically stop in 0.5 seconds, regardless of reaction time. Unless, of course, my failure to develop telepathy in order to sense when other drivers are just going to blatantly ignore road laws is a genetic fault of mine.

But my all means, continue your armchair debate.
 

Madara XIII

New member
Sep 23, 2010
3,369
0
0
EverythingIncredible said:
Truth Cake said:
EverythingIncredible said:
Why would you date if you aren't going to have children?

And ever heard of a carrier? Just because their immediate children don't have it doesn't mean that their kids won't either?
Well, certainly not because you care about them and actaully enjoy their company as more than just friends- no, children are the ONLY reason to pursue a romantic relationship with someone at all.
Yes...that's what romance is for...

It's to find someone whose traits are desirable enough by your standards to reproduce with.

That's how humanity works. Why else would I keep myself out of dating?
....I...what!? WHAT WHAT WHAT!?
Dear God, you can't expect us to believe that all the romantic poets only had the goal of having children in mind!
Nor even the very first Romantic poets.....King David is an exception.

But seriously I think we've established the idea in modern day society that just because you love someone doesn't mean you're obliged to bear their offspring.The idea of Romance usually stems from a person's infatuation towards another human being with traits THEY find desirable and compatible with.
It usually involves desiring not just their physical characteristics but their personality and mentality as well.

What you deem as desirable coincides with the idea of breeding for the best.
Not all people desire such an act or similar traits.
If anything having children is more of an incentive towards your love and affection of said person.
It isn't required, though and shouldn't be in a relationship.

No offense but the way you describe Romance sounds robotic and almost unfeeling.
Pairing the best genes does not always result with the best result.

[HEADING=1]HAVE WE LEARNED NOTHING FROM METAL GEAR SOLID!?[/HEADING]
 

Nalgas D. Lemur

New member
Nov 20, 2009
1,318
0
0
Sirtety said:
It may just be the art style or my limited sign language vocabulary, but why is Shizune signing the word "turtle"?
Heh. Nice catch. That's also one of the words in my limited vocabulary for some reason, and it sure looks like it to me.

EverythingIncredible said:
 

Weaver

Overcaffeinated
Apr 28, 2008
8,977
0
0
Nalgas D. Lemur said:
Sirtety said:
It may just be the art style or my limited sign language vocabulary, but why is Shizune signing the word "turtle"?
Heh. Nice catch. That's also one of the words in my limited vocabulary for some reason, and it sure looks like it to me.

EverythingIncredible said:
I'd say it's fairly obviously a troll.
If only the escapist mods were as ruthless as the by-gone days of 2008 :(
 

kingpocky

New member
Jan 21, 2009
169
0
0
EverythingIncredible, you really had me for a minute. I was convinced that you were advocating eugenics, and saying that relationships are only for passing genetic material, and genuinely shocked by your opinions.

And then you said that people who are involved in car accidents shouldn't reproduce either. Totally blew any believability for anything you've said. You were doing so well too.