Anti - Olympic Protestors.

Recommended Videos

RandV80

New member
Oct 1, 2009
1,507
0
0
While I'm not fully up to speed because I left Vancouver & BC in 2005, and only moved back last year, I'd like to add a few what I hope are fair & unbiased points.

1. Montreal debt repayment. Yes Montreal just finished paying off their Olympic debt from like 40 years ago. What is likely not known here though is why: the big ass stadium they had to build. To host the Olympics, they had to build one of those huge stadiums to hold the ceremonies and track & field events, same as the one China built. This was the single biggest expense for them and had little use afterwards. Vancouver on the other hand, for the Winter Olympics did not need to build one of these. BC Place (Football stadium - opening ceremonies), GM Place (NHL rink -> Mens Ice Hockey), Pacific Coliseum (old NHL rink -> figure skating, UBC Thunderbird Arena (College hockey -> women's & other misc hockey), all the big venues already exist. Except of course for a speed skating oval which was built in Richmond, but that is one of the things that has been handled nicely as it will be converted to a community center. I'm not sure how we'll compare to Montreal but the biggest projects that were done were two big local infrastructure projects - A rapid transit line extending from Vancouver south into Richmond and the Airport, and upgrading the Sea to Sky highway to 4 lanes (connecting Vancouver to world class ski resort Whistler, used to be a single lane windy mountain road death trap).

2. Yes we're hosting the Olympics right in the middle of a recession, which doesn't seem too smart. We however were not in a recession when the bid to host the Olympics was made. We were also not in a recession when the city held a local plebiscite on whether or not to host the Olympics which won by a good majority. (Note though this was held only city boundaries of Vancouver, not the surrounding cities that make up the Metropolis area or the rest of the Province. Also estimates of costs at the time were badly under estimated.)

3. $X billion that could've been spent else where? Let's be realistic here, had Vancouver not hosted the Olympics, this $8 billion or whatever it is wouldn't have magically appeared to spend on the homeless & health care & education or whatever. Whether or not we can recuperate what was spent, and the tax burden it's going to place on the province is a very real question. However by hosting the Olympics we do create a stream of revenue, as well as give local politicians an excuse to spend on badly needed infrastructure that they would otherwise balk at due to the price tag.

Had we not hosted the Olympics, we'd still be in a recession, in need of some infrastructure upgrades, cutting budgets on schools, high rent, high tuitiion, low minimum wage, and have a huge homeless problem & drug problem in the DTES. For that matter, we already spend a **** load of money on the DTES, it's just a black hole that sucks in crack heads & the like from around the country. There are some 10,000 homeless crack addicts living there largely because it's readily available and accessible supply of drugs. It's not like we just ignore it, I've heard (but can't verify) the DTES costs Vancouver & BC something like $1,000,000 a day.

4. Benefit of sports. This being a gaming community, sports aren't going to be well received. Especially with a lot of American geeks & gamers with their whole 'jock' culture they have, though they may not realize it's an American trait. I'm biased on the other hand as that while an intelligent geek I've also been blessed with a great deal of athleticism (but can't say the same for social skills) and love sports.

The thing is, sports & recreation are healthy for the community, children & youth. A child that gets into organized sports is less likely to participate in criminal or gang activity, drugs, or other destructive area's. I believe this could be seen in Russia after the collapse of the Soviet Union, when the USSR sports funding stopped and the athletics program dropped, youth crime & violence went up. It's one of the reasons why they're so big on making the KHL successful and don't mind dumping millions of dollars into it.

----------------

I think that's about it. Basically while many of us BC'ers are concerned how we're going to pay it off, the people you see out there actually protesting likely aren't the ones that are going to be paying taxes to pay it. Rather they're the ones that fought the Olympics tooth & nail from the start and still have their panties in a bunch that they lost & the games are here. At the very least they're keeping it peaceful, the small masked group that went violent are those anarchist from around Canada and US that flock to any major protest just to smash things up and provoke the police. Also, many of the concerns people site about the Province and related to the games would be there regardless. Like low minimum wage and high tuition, those were set by our centrist pro-business provincial government before the games came.
 

PinkAngelKitty

New member
Jan 24, 2010
172
0
0
For those of you claiming that the Olympics is a pointless affair:

Consider how many countries are participating in the games. A lot. And not only are the athletes of these nations in Canada right now, their politicians are also in Canada to watch their countrymen compete. Ok so lets recount. Thousands of athletes and diplomats from countries around the world are currently in Canada, participating in a friendly competition. DOES ANYBODY SEE THE FUCKING VALUE IN THAT?!
 

Squarez

New member
Apr 17, 2009
719
0
0
Akalabeth said:
Dorian6 said:
dunno.

The Olympics is a celebration of sportsmanship and athleticism. Where countries all over the world who would normally hate each other can put that aside in the name of friendly competition (with the exception of Iran and Israel).

I can understand protesting the Beijing Olympics, genocide and oppression being two staples of Chinese society, but Canada? Canada is f*cking awesome. I have no idea what these protests are all aboot.
Oh wow another informed opinion. Genocide a staple of Chinese society? What are you an idiot? You think every country in the world has clean hands? No country does. And irregardless the actions of a government are NOT reflective of the values of that society. Or is China extra bad because they allegedly abuse their own people, whereas someone like the United States abuses Iraqi prisoners and bombs Afghani weddings and holds hundreds of people without charge so it's okay??

Please.

Canada for example during WW2 sent all japanese canadians to prison camps, liquidated all their assets (ie sold their houses, cars, businesses, boats, possessions for pennies), and then at the end of the war, split them up even more.

Did they do this to the German canadians? No.

Hell even the United States, who interned their japanese americans at least let those people go back to their houses after the war. Rather than sell them off for a dollar a piece or whatever nonsensical prices they went for.
I'm sorry, but that whole statement was rendered completely null and void in my book because you used the word "irregardless".
 

Danpascooch

Zombie Specialist
Apr 16, 2009
5,231
0
0
The only justification I can think of is that parents force their kids into it and pressure them to kind of let whatever sport they are trying to get into the Olympics for consume their lives.

Some of the stories I've heard of Olympic athletes are kind of horrible, but I wouldn't call it useless, and I CERTAINLY wouldn't bother protesting it.
 

Danpascooch

Zombie Specialist
Apr 16, 2009
5,231
0
0
Squarez said:
Akalabeth said:
Dorian6 said:
dunno.

The Olympics is a celebration of sportsmanship and athleticism. Where countries all over the world who would normally hate each other can put that aside in the name of friendly competition (with the exception of Iran and Israel).

I can understand protesting the Beijing Olympics, genocide and oppression being two staples of Chinese society, but Canada? Canada is f*cking awesome. I have no idea what these protests are all aboot.
Oh wow another informed opinion. Genocide a staple of Chinese society? What are you an idiot? You think every country in the world has clean hands? No country does. And irregardless the actions of a government are NOT reflective of the values of that society. Or is China extra bad because they allegedly abuse their own people, whereas someone like the United States abuses Iraqi prisoners and bombs Afghani weddings and holds hundreds of people without charge so it's okay??

Please.

Canada for example during WW2 sent all japanese canadians to prison camps, liquidated all their assets (ie sold their houses, cars, businesses, boats, possessions for pennies), and then at the end of the war, split them up even more.

Did they do this to the German canadians? No.

Hell even the United States, who interned their japanese americans at least let those people go back to their houses after the war. Rather than sell them off for a dollar a piece or whatever nonsensical prices they went for.
I'm sorry, but that whole statement was rendered completely null and void in my book because you used the word "irregardless".
Seconded, it doesn't matter how good an argument is, the word "Irregardless" immediately ruins it.
 

Mekado

New member
Mar 20, 2009
1,282
0
0
thealmightykain said:
Seriously, as a person who lives in BC (and grew up in northern BC for that matter) the amount of money shoveled into the Olympics utterly disgusts me. All those billions of dollars (the Vancouver Sun estimates that more than $6 billion, with $1 billion just for security and the new trade/convention centre EACH, will be the total cost) would have been better spent almost anywhere in the province (say, perhaps, in the north). Let's not forget that millions were paid to already-billion-dollar corporations for advertising. And the whole thing with Vancouver passing bylaws making it illegal to place any advertisements near the game venues that are anti-Olympic, then later altering that bylaw to simply make it illegal to "interfere with someone's enjoyment of Olympic entertainment".
Good luck with that, it took 30 years for Montreal to repay the olympic stadium, and that's with using a special tobacco tax that was used exclusively for repayment (plus the regular repayments,obviously)

Some cities might make money with that but my guess is it's more of a pride thing than a revenue thing...
 

keillord

New member
Feb 10, 2010
198
0
0
The problem with certain protesters are that they do stupid stuff like riot. This makes no one listen and hurts their cause. Also they make a bad name for people who protest right and for good reasons. One thing I hate are people who protest just because everyone else is. They should do something because it means something to them not because other people do it.
 

megatron2.0

New member
Feb 18, 2009
196
0
0
LordNue said:
Why are they protesting? Do they hate exercise? Do they just hate the greeks and things that stem from them? (boy would they be in for a shock?) Or are they just stupid? These questions must be answered.
I think yes they are stupid. that alone anwers your others.
 

Bretty

New member
Jul 15, 2008
864
0
0
SinisterSpade said:
Bretty said:
I am sorry but you are wrong.

History has shown that the olympics increases the money brought into the area for up to 4 years. It's called the Olympic effect. Everything from Tourism to corporate sponsorship etc.
Yeah, no. Again, as said earlier in the topic. Montreal just paid off the 1976 Olympics two years ago. Thirty two years to pay off one event? Apparently they weren't exactly getting that much out of it.

To shorten things up for you: You're wrong, get over it.
Learn your history mate... Montreal custom built nearly all their venues for the games....

Vancouver didnt... so do the math.
 

Bretty

New member
Jul 15, 2008
864
0
0
SinisterSpade said:
Bretty said:
SinisterSpade said:
Bretty said:
I am sorry but you are wrong.

History has shown that the olympics increases the money brought into the area for up to 4 years. It's called the Olympic effect. Everything from Tourism to corporate sponsorship etc.
Yeah, no. Again, as said earlier in the topic. Montreal just paid off the 1976 Olympics two years ago. Thirty two years to pay off one event? Apparently they weren't exactly getting that much out of it.

To shorten things up for you: You're wrong, get over it.
Learn your history mate... Montreal custom built nearly all their venues for the games....

Vancouver didnt... so do the math.
Learn to do some actual math, mate.

Montreal spent around two billion dollars. Vancouver is spending around six billion. Now, with inflation, which would bring Montreal's total up if compared to today, Vancouver would still be spending more than Montreal.

Is that going through your head now, mate? Eh, mate? Also, learn to stop abusing ellipses.
Ummmm VANOC is flush.... that means it is in the black.... that means no debt....

Sooo where is this debt you talk of? Where? If you are right send me some links that back your argument up? I am on probation so I am not going to go to your level. Obviously the fact that someone is not agreeing with you upsets you so I will leave it at that.
 

Bretty

New member
Jul 15, 2008
864
0
0
The fact you are calling me a troll confuses me?

And I am not arguing anything about Montreal not being in debt.. They were in debt because they built nearly every venue they used from scratch. This is just not the case with VANOC. They are using old venues and making them modern. BC Place for one (You know, the main venue...)

And I know they are not in debt as they are turning down Gov't money left and right. The Gov't stopped giving money to the Montreal commitee. So can you see any differences.

All you are stating is opinion, just like me. But at least I am not throwing 'troll' around to make my points stick.
 

Bretty

New member
Jul 15, 2008
864
0
0
SinisterSpade said:
Bretty said:
The fact you are calling me a troll confuses me?

And I am not arguing anything about Montreal not being in debt.. They were in debt because they built nearly every venue they used from scratch. This is just not the case with VANOC. They are using old venues and making them modern. BC Place for one (You know, the main venue...)

And I know they are not in debt as they are turning down Gov't money left and right. The Gov't stopped giving money to the Montreal commitee. So can you see any differences.

All you are stating is opinion, just like me. But at least I am not throwing 'troll' around to make my points stick.
...there appears to be something not getting through your thick skull. Yes, Montreal built completely new venues, and Vancouver is just making old ones better. But Vancouver is still spending more than twice the amount doing this than Montreal spent on theirs, and that is giving room for inflation. Is that not clicking with you. It doesn't matter if the venues are built brand new, or renovated. What matters is how much is spent doing this. And Vancouver is, again, SPENDING MUCH, MUCH MORE.

And it's not opinion. It's cold hard facts that don't seem to be clicking with you. Also, Vancouver IS in debt. It was in debt before the Olympics, and the debt is growing even more now.

"The debt rating service DBRS has downgraded the City of Vancouver's credit rating by one notch from AA (high) to AA, and says the outlook remains negative because of the financial sinkhole at the Olympic Village."

"Vancouver?This city's debt rating has been put on watch by Standard and Poor's after the city's mayor said another injection of $458 million needs to be put into the floundering Olympic athletes' village.

In a statement issued yesterday, Standard and Poor's downgraded the city's credit rating from stable to credit watch, a term to indicate the ratings agency is concerned about Vancouver's increased debt load."

Now. Either you just have a thick skull that is unable to comprehend the most simple of things, or you're a troll. It's that simple.

HAHAHAHAHAHA.... you think the city of Vancouver is bankrolling this?? are you for real??

VANOC is the bankrolling organisation here. So well done doing a whole lot of reasearch for nothing.

VANOC is funded PURELY by commercial partners or for slow people, sponsors. They are funded by corporate dollar. The only Public money used is from Provinces is 'sponsorship' monies that they were obligated to pay if they wanted to be partners.

So ummm... where is Vancouver's (the city) money in all this? Do you actually think Vancouver is sinking billions into this? HAHAHAHAHAHA, beauty.

Learn how this stuff all works before you try and come off as an 'intelligent' poster.

Oh and go research how much money they spent in the Torino, I would hardly even use Montreal as a good example here?
 

Captain Schpack

New member
Apr 22, 2009
909
0
0
I enjoy the Olympics. I don;'t see the issue all of the countries/most of the countries of the world are gathering for a friendly sporting event and someone has to have an issue with it.