Anti-Virus Software: What should I use and why?

Recommended Videos

Cobbs

New member
Aug 16, 2008
409
0
0
After many hours of searching, the internet has failed me. AVG is the best, unless you use Kaspersky. But Kaspersky sucks in comparison to Norten. :S
The obvious solution is to get the general consensus of the Escapsits. So dispense your thick salty knowledge upon my tender face!
 

tippy2k2

Beloved Tyrant
Legacy
Mar 15, 2008
14,870
2,349
118
Who is your ISP? A lot of ISP's give you a free anti-virus (for example, Comcast gives me Norton Antivirus, which is what I use).
 

Elate

New member
Nov 21, 2010
584
0
0
Avast, because it's free, and it's good. I also think it works with AVG. Never used AVG though, always Avast.

...and I dream of sailing the seven seas for booty and plunder, yar.
 

Cobbs

New member
Aug 16, 2008
409
0
0
I'm in Australia with Telstra and they're about as helpful as a chocolate kettle as is so I doubt free anti-virus for me.
 

Casual Shinji

Should've gone before we left.
Legacy
Jul 18, 2009
20,519
5,335
118
I've just used Norton for years.

The general notion apparently is that it sucks, but I've never had any real problems with it. But then I'm not much of a downloader, so that could be it.
 

Esotera

New member
May 5, 2011
3,400
0
0
Absolutely nothing. If you're careful with what you download, and don't visit any dodgy websites, then the chance of you getting some form of malware on your computer is minimal. AV software might be useful for the occasional monthly scan if you're not that great with security, but it's a massive resource hog and relies on someone else identifying the virus first.

If you think you're infected though, try malware bytes.
 

Hawkolf

New member
Mar 14, 2012
68
0
0
I've used Comodo for years and I've been really happy with it. It's free and has worked perfectly with me.
 

Rossmallo

New member
Feb 20, 2008
574
0
0
Avast Antivirus is fantastic. I got hacked on WoW, and during the recovery progress, an admin told me to get Avast, as it was what he used.

Not had a single security blip for two years now.
 

razer17

New member
Feb 3, 2009
2,518
0
0
DO NOT go with Norton or Mcaffee, they are bloated and use up more RAM, they are ov priced, and they actually suck compared to other anti virus programs.

I used to have Norton a couple years back, came free with my laptop. I managed to get a virus somehow, and Norton didn't detect it, certainly couldn't get rid of it. So I contacted the Norton support people, and told them. They told me they could fix it, but I'd have to give them remoteacces, plus £70. I told them no. £70 to remove a virus that their program should fix anyway? No thanks. So I removed the virus myself, using a little Google-fu, took me no more than 5 minutes. Then I uninstalled Norton and went back to AVG.

AS to what do I reccomend? AVG has never steered me wrong. MAybe it's because I'm careful so I just haven't had a virus, but I hear AVG is very good in general. Also, it's free so that's a big plus. there is a paid version with more advanced security features, but I've never needed them.

Esotera said:
Absolutely nothing. If you're careful with what you download, and don't visit any dodgy websites, then the chance of you getting some form of malware on your computer is minimal. AV software might be useful for the occasional monthly scan if you're not that great with security, but it's a massive resource hog and relies on someone else identifying the virus first.

If you think you're infected though, try malware bytes.
It's not just about being safe. That can stop 90% of viruses, but there's other ways. Hackers can target you and upload it straight to your PC (Although that's probably more likely for non- civilian computers), hackers could hijack a site that is usually safe and insert some malicious code into it, and a ton of other ways.

As for being a resource hog, my AVG is currently using less than 4MB of my RAM, and 0% of my CPU, and since I have 4GB of RAM, it really isn't a resource hog at all.
 

SnowyGamester

Tech Head
Oct 18, 2009
938
0
0
I wouldn't recommend Norton...if it works it works, but if it doesn't you'll probably have to format reinstall (it is really intrusive and hard to get rid of...I know there's an uninstaller but it doesn't always work, and the fact that it needs a separate uninstaller isn't a good sign). If you want something free, just use Microsoft Security Essentials (AVG tends to have a fairly poor detection rate and doesn't offer real-time protection in the free version afaik). If you want something good, however, Zonealarm is probably the best alternative out there. I've had experience with quite a few, and that is the one that has given me the least trouble and offers the most protection (and it's cheap compared to most other paid ones).

Also use common sense. Don't open links that people send you if it's how they start a conversation (even if you know them, they could be compromised). Don't browse dodgy sites without disabling everything but text and images. And don't click on banner ads, they're bad news.
 

Ccx55

New member
Dec 6, 2011
20
0
0
I agree with razer17, Norton and Mcaffee are horrible.

I recommend either AVG or Kaspersky. AVG has a great free version with most of the vital features operational. If you're looking for complete protection, and have some money to spare, then Kaspersky is practically unbeatable when it comes to overall internet security.

Personally, I use a licensed version of AVG Internet Security and it hasn't let me down yet.
 

Broady Brio

New member
Jun 28, 2009
2,784
0
0
I use ESET NOD32 Antivirus. It gets the job done. Norton use to be a resource hog, but the 2012 version has been known to not do that.

Just get anything really, and most of all? Just be careful what you download.
 

loc978

New member
Sep 18, 2010
4,900
0
0
I've always found anything with a paid subscription plan to be ridiculously unstable... Norton and McAfee have both pissed me off to no end when I'm working on someone else's computer.

As for me, nothing. I generally use Linux for anything that isn't gaming, so my NTFS partitions are completely disposable and quickly rewritable. If someone starts writing viruses that can trash ext4 filesystems, I'll start to worry.

...I've got most of my family running AVG, though, because it's easy.
 

TheKaduflyerSystem

New member
Feb 15, 2011
116
0
0
Microsoft Security essentials is nice, does all the work quietly when it needs to, doesn't DEVOUR MY LAPTOP'S RAM like Norten. MSE will work fine, is free. But yeah, just be careful with what and where you download.
 

BeerTent

Resident Furry Pimp
May 8, 2011
1,167
0
0
IMO, if you really use your PC, any antivirus is intrusive, annoying, an does virtually nothing you can't do already.

I recommend nothing. As long as your not partially retarded, you won't get a virus. Every three months, get a list of Antivirus software to "run once", I recommend MalwareBytes, Bit Defender, Spybot, and Super AntiMalware, which brings me to my second point that relying on one is also retarded if you think you actually got something, or if your doing a routine check because they don't share their virus definitions. Something that'll get picked up by MBAM might not be found by BitDefender, and Spybot might get more false positives or something.

So, grab those once every three months. Install them, run them, and then uninstall them. Done. I run this list on customer's PC's, and most of the time, it'll get fixed. If I can't install anything, (IE: if it's fucking terrible.) Then it's breaking out Google and Rkill that will.

These AV programs, Kapersky, AVG, Mcafee, Norton... Prettymuch do the same thing as the shit I scrape off my boot.
 

Liquidcool

New member
Jun 5, 2010
68
0
0
I recommend Kaspersky. I've tried a whole bunch of protection software and so far Kaspersky is my favorite.
 

Headdrivehardscrew

New member
Aug 22, 2011
1,660
0
0
Cobbs said:
After many hours of searching, the internet has failed me. AVG is the best, unless you use Kaspersky. But Kaspersky sucks in comparison to Norten. :S
The obvious solution is to get the general consensus of the Escapsits. So dispense your thick salty knowledge upon my tender face!
I don't think a general consensus is highly probable.

No single one solution is outstandingly good on all fronts.

Norton was the best around fifteen years ago. These days, I consider it to be one of the more bloated, annoying and useless ones. It's not completely useless, but I wouldn't want to rely on it. I never recommend Norton, it seems to have become one of those things that offer you a certain feeling of security every year you let it have your credit card data. It also pats you on the back for not having any viruses, but the typical Norton user around here gets confused by even those pop-ups, so...

I've had good experiences with the free offerings of AVAST! and AVG, and my internet provider gives me a branded F-Secure solution that works much more efficiently than AVAST! and AVG, but it also tends to eat up resources, mess things up if you up the security, as I found it does not like the way I handle security in the home or home office environment. Also, it's a bit awkward if not downright impossible to fix things, with a bit too much of the more important stuff being hidden away or not up for modifying, so F-Secure is one of those that tends to get turned off often, because it randomly disables the most simple tasks, like printing over wifi.

I have to fine-tune it, which is a bit of a pain in the butt, especially if one relies on duplicating well-kept installs of the Windows Firewall, and the software insists of bringing its own take on a firewall to the table, with no easy way to import any sort of settings.

Usually, mix'n'match is not a good idea. My personal favourite (in tandem with the Windows Firewall) is Kaspersky Antivirus, has been so for some years now. I've had to rely on Kaspersky's Rescue disc/USB-Stick twice already, and it's been a lifesaver. Just the rescue disc alone (in combination with up-to-date virus/malware definitions) can easily be a one-stop solution to the most pesky pests. It boots into Linux, so basic Linux knowledge doesn't hurt.

One of the most important anti-malware best practices is careful clicks around search engine results, and extreme vigilance around email messages containing links. That doesn't do anything for drive-by-downloads through modified ads or payload-download over java- or some other script.

Some people rely on Microsoft's 'free', as in integrated offerings. It really depends on how risky you roll on the interwebs. If you're in the position where you generally don't think you know what you're doing, get a free 30-day trial (if possible) and see how you like it. If you feel secure and in control, and it doesn't break things, slow everything down to a crawl or annoy you too much, get a license for an all-in-one solution for a year.