Minecraft may or may not be playable on your computer. I think there's a demo now, so you would probably be able to find out pretty easily. Same goes for Dwarf Fortress - the system requirements on that one are a little strange haha.
Gothic 3 was a good game, even wrote a review on it (with pathches) and found it to be an enjoyable experience. Also while I havent beatenSmashLovesTitanQuest said:Not that bad? NOT THAT BAD?!?!?!Korten12 said:The third one isn't that bad. Also for the fact that the community patches have fixed almost all the bugs.SmashLovesTitanQuest said:Gothic 1 and 2.
Just ignore the third one. For the love of all that is holy, ignore it. Pretend it does not exist.
I will not even merit this with a proper reply.
Hardly true I'd say. The last computer I had that ran purely on DoS used a 486 processor. Systems were being built and sold with processors half the speed of the OP's in the XP era.ResonanceGames said:It seems really silly to arbitrarily ignore all Dos games, since that's what most of the open world games that your hardware can handle run on.
'Eclectic Dreck said:Hardly true I'd say. The last computer I had that ran purely on DoS used a 486 processor. Systems were being built and sold with processors half the speed of the OP's in the XP era.ResonanceGames said:It seems really silly to arbitrarily ignore all Dos games, since that's what most of the open world games that your hardware can handle run on.
That point I could agree with. Some of my best gaming memories came from DOS even if they weren't open world. Future Shock is, by far, the best game based upon the Terminator property ever made for example.ResonanceGames said:'Eclectic Dreck said:Hardly true I'd say. The last computer I had that ran purely on DoS used a 486 processor. Systems were being built and sold with processors half the speed of the OP's in the XP era.ResonanceGames said:It seems really silly to arbitrarily ignore all Dos games, since that's what most of the open world games that your hardware can handle run on.
That wasn't my point. I can think of at least a dozen great open world DOS games that his computer will run right off the bat, and I'm sure if I thought about it I could come up with even more. Compared to the 8 or so real open world games listed in this thread.
check out their games, they have a lot of good old open world games.drednoahl said:
This. It's a great exercise in world-building and there's just so much content. It really does support a wide variety of playstyles, too - I played it as an aristocratic elf beauty who went around charming other people into doing her dirty work for her.willis888 said:Arcanum: of Steamworks and Magic Obscura. It's a steampunk + magic open world RPG. The combat mechanics are not the best, but the quaint Victorian dialogue is amusing.
I keep getting confused between Heroes of might and magic and might and magi >.<Zantos said:Might and Magic 1 through 9 are all on GoG.com, I wouldn't bother with 9, and I think the first 2 are more point and click, though without the click. Either way they're a pretty solid series and require system requirements roughly fulfilled by a tub of neapolitan ice cream. They're not exactly open world. Instead they're pretty big regions connected by a fast travel system, though that's really just so they can be quite varied locations without having to go through transitions between forest and desert, ya know. Might and Magic 7 is probably my favourite RPG ever.
What's wrong with 9? I think it's the game I've got the furthest in, in an M&M game. I've never finished any of them.Zantos said:Might and Magic 1 through 9 are all on GoG.com, I wouldn't bother with 9, and I think the first 2 are more point and click, though without the click. Either way they're a pretty solid series and require system requirements roughly fulfilled by a tub of neapolitan ice cream. They're not exactly open world. Instead they're pretty big regions connected by a fast travel system, though that's really just so they can be quite varied locations without having to go through transitions between forest and desert, ya know. Might and Magic 7 is probably my favourite RPG ever.
It was a good game, it just seemed to have some sort of fetish for bugging out on me. Plus, I loved the whole surroundy screen thingy, I know it's just a matter of personal taste but it didn't feel like a M&M game without it.Blood Brain Barrier said:What's wrong with 9? I think it's the game I've got the furthest in, in an M&M game. I've never finished any of them.Zantos said:Might and Magic 1 through 9 are all on GoG.com, I wouldn't bother with 9, and I think the first 2 are more point and click, though without the click. Either way they're a pretty solid series and require system requirements roughly fulfilled by a tub of neapolitan ice cream. They're not exactly open world. Instead they're pretty big regions connected by a fast travel system, though that's really just so they can be quite varied locations without having to go through transitions between forest and desert, ya know. Might and Magic 7 is probably my favourite RPG ever.
Whoops, thoght they had the same name.ResonanceGames said:It seems really silly to arbitrarily ignore all Dos games, since that's what most of the open world games that your hardware can handle run on.
Yeah, Deus EX ("The Conspiracy" is the name of the PS2 port, so don't buy that for your PC ha ha) is the best game I've ever played, but it's not remotely open world. It does have big levels though, so it might be worth a shot.Hgame said:or Deus EX the conspiracy- massively recommend. IMO best game ever made.