Game theory can get very interesting, mostly because it can be applied to anything.
Though the prisoner's dilemma is boring, don't do that. I vaguely remember this interesting game on repetition, which dealt with small fish establishing a mutually beneficial relationship with a larger fish, but both sides had to resist going against each other even though it was more convenient. The whole issue with the game is repetition of the game and how it affects strategy.
Then, there was another very interesting game which was a variation on the prisoner's dilemma and was an issue of psychology, the dangerous game - where one strategy produces a potential payoff so undesirable the player may not want to take that strategy even though the non-deadly option is better than the other strategy. Though that may be stretching it, that one's not really a math thing. Though you may be able to make it one.
Game theory starts off with really easy math, but after a bit, you cross this line, and you venture into the realm of high-level math. It can get fairly ridiculous and difficult, but highly rewarding - you can apply game theory to almost any situation, especially in the business world. 8 Nobel Memorial Prize for Economics winners were game theorists.