I tried to. I purchased the game based entirely on the weight of the box (in my experience, the heavier the box the better the game tends to be, at least that used to be true before games all shipped with a tiny pamplet of instructions and a warranty card as a rule rather than an exception).Maxman3002 said:Ok in a previous thread I mentioned a game called 'Arcanum' which was by the makers of Vampyre: the masqurade but a totally different style of game. Both games were brilliantly made and a wonder to play. They were both also extremly bugged
I feel this should be a testimate to how good each of these games are that a company can release 2 extremely bugged games but both are still amazingly fun to play and extremely open
Those of you who have come to this thread wondering what arcanum is: It is a top down RPG (Diablo style) in a steampunk era. You play as a self designed character exploring the open world of arcanum. You can use magic, technology and skills to and any quest can be done however you choose. This openess is taken so far that any quest you encounter can be done however you feel. You can even kill the person giving you the quest and just take the rewards. You can kill every person in the game, and the shear number of quests is staggering. You have to play it multiple times just to see most of them. I would advise it to any fan of an open RPG
My real question though is: Has anyone else actually played this game??
That's not true for several of the characters. The first guy you meet has several plot events and a personality; most of the rest have at least a few sentences worth of description to their personality and abilities. The voiced characters do have a few interesting quirks to their name (several of the many ones that you can recruit have extra quests) though it's not much. It's not anywhere near deep enough to be a good point of the game, but there are many worse games out there in that regard.Nmil-ek said:I have played it and although at points it really drew me in the engine was fairly weak and frankly it was impossible to give a toss about any of the characters. Your NPC partners (all woefully AI controlled) have no personality whatsoever, the one or two have actually have spoken dialogue pretty much repeat the same two or three lines over and over in combat then clam up for the rest of the game. Nice premise and it had potential but no characterisation really killed it for me.
The Elder Scrolls are much inferior in my opinion; their setting is much less original (especially Oblivion), their character development is more restrictive, most quests have one solution, the spells are less diverse, the potential differences between characters are smaller, and the dialogue is poor. They do have more content, but I'll take Arcanum any day.Blindrooster said:No. But I hate the elder scrolls. (which this sounds like)
I own it, and when I was younger, played it for a day or so. It bored me at that age, but now I'm mature enough to enjoy text-based games and turn based Role playing Games, I may very well give this so-called gem another go.Maxman3002 said:Ok in a previous thread I mentioned a game called 'Arcanum' which was by the makers of Vampyre: the masqurade but a totally different style of game. Both games were brilliantly made and a wonder to play. They were both also extremly bugged
I feel this should be a testimate to how good each of these games are that a company can release 2 extremely bugged games but both are still amazingly fun to play and extremely open
Those of you who have come to this thread wondering what arcanum is: It is a top down RPG (Diablo style) in a steampunk era. You play as a self designed character exploring the open world of arcanum. You can use magic, technology and skills to and any quest can be done however you choose. This openess is taken so far that any quest you encounter can be done however you feel. You can even kill the person giving you the quest and just take the rewards. You can kill every person in the game, and the shear number of quests is staggering. You have to play it multiple times just to see most of them. I would advise it to any fan of an open RPG
My real question though is: Has anyone else actually played this game??
Yea your right. It is a lot more like the origional fallout games. I only mentioned diablo because it was the first game that came to mind for the camera angles. Its a lot like fallout but the shear openness of it makes fallout almost look linear. People who often read reviews and find the reviewer complaining that a game claims to give you choice but only offers you totally good or totally evil, this game is an example of real choice. Good, evil, betraying, total genocide, or just plain robbing everyone. Even the main story line can be done by simply killing or robbing everyone you see and finding clues to continue onTread184 said:I own this game, it's one of my favorite RPGs ever. It's SO open ended and you can do SO much in it, much more than the original 2 Fallout games. Speaking of the Fallout series, many of the creators of Arcanum were former members of Black Isle and co creators of the Fallout games.
Ha yea,and there was referance to sex in it. As a woman you could get things simply by having sex with the right people if you had the beauty. There was no actual sex scenes in it though for anyone currently bidding on ebay for it just to see pixely low res pornSatin6T said:my girlfriend says this is like her favorite game ever, I only clicked on this thread to see if she made an account and made this thread...
however it wasn't her, obviously,
but yeah sounded like fun, i'm trying to find a copy of it
the sex scenes sounded funny
Yes its better than Icewind dale. To clear things up here: People who have played Icewind Dale, Elder Scrolls or other games on that Par and got put off by the charater creation, this game is not like that. It is reasonably easy to use and the skills are obvious as to what they do. You basicly get a point each time you level and you can use it wherever (increace strenght, dex, increace your skill at theiving or shooting, learn a new tech or spell)Daedalus1942 said:I own it, and when I was younger, played it for a day or so. It bored me at that age, but now I'm mature enough to enjoy text-based games and turn based Role playing Games, I may very well give this so-called gem another go.
It's got to be better than Icewind Dale. That game was just awful.
Unfortunatly they were forced to releace early by their publishers. The same thing also happened with Vampyres:The Masqurade hence the same issues with massive bugs in the game. Both games also lacked in any sort of adverticement and eventually became known only by the origional fans. Lucky Vampyres got a second chance on steam and has done well by arcanum got left into obscurityJandau said:Played it, it was OK. A lot of interesting concepts ruined by atrocious graphics (the first Fallout looked better!), poor balancing, bugs, etc. It was one of those games that would have been legendary if only they had a bigger budget to do some proper graphics and polish the game much more.
Yea I had that. Even played it on a LAN with a few friends that I got into the game. Unfortunatly it was really hard and then the story for it trailed off quite quickly. It was never completed properly to work as a proper add on. Good fun for a LAN game though. And the level editor they gave with it has lead to some awsome extra campaigns to play. Gotta love the online communities sometimesctrl-alt-postal said:On the disc, did anyone else have a second campaign starting on some kind of small town where you only had two ways out, one to a desert islandish place full of zombies and the other a forest (you had to save someone)?