Are humans meant to be monogamous creatures?

Recommended Videos

xxmyhero64xx

New member
May 25, 2011
128
0
0
Ever since I heard word of my aunt and uncle getting divorced (two people who have been together since I can remember) I started wondering if human beings are really meant to stay with one other person till death. My parents are divorced after 20 years, I've seen relationships die after couples being together for years, and the divorce rate in America is 50%. It makes me wonder considering the physical goal of male humans is to spread the genetic seed as much as possible, does it do our species any good to just stay with one partner till death?
 

Drakmeire

Elite Member
Jun 27, 2009
2,590
0
41
Country
United States
I highly doubt it, we have no neurological drive to stay with someone except for "There are no achievable substitutes" and "Social drives"
the idea of romance itself is an invention of humanity to add deeper meaning to what in the end is Hormones and Chemical reactions.
Annnnnnd. with that I am going to be single forever.
 

monstersquad

New member
Jun 7, 2010
421
0
0
It doesnt do us any good genetically, but we're far past that. If you look at other apes( we are apes, no use denying it), they're generally polygamous, and with chimps especially, there's a healthy amount of incest thrown in there as well. This is fine for their society, but it obviously wouldn't work in ours.

But culturally, monogamy is more important now than it ever was, considering the myriad of killer STDs out there, and just the sheer amount of people around make it more about safety and familiarity than anything else. However, I can also see how the generation of our parents really seemed to need that connection, while in our days, the implications surrounding marriage and monogamy are much different than they used to be.
 

Radoh

Bans for the Ban God~
Jun 10, 2010
1,456
0
0
As I understand it, it is a man's genetic prerogative to get as many women pregnant as possible, while it is a woman's prerogative to stay with one man throughout their life. Take that as you will.
 

Vanguard_Ex

New member
Mar 19, 2008
4,687
0
0
We are not just slaves of our biology, nor are we the product. We are long past the 'spread your gene as much as possible' stage. We reason, use logic, have complex communication and emotions. Hell, the fact that you engage yourself in a partnership based on unwritten, unspoken but universally understood rules is evidence itself that you are not simply a breeding machine with one purpose and one purpose only.

But then who am I to tell you that we should just be monogamous? There is no single right way to live life.

In a nutshell: People can sleep around as much as they want, I'm not disputing that. But I feel that we are long, long past the stage where it is our main purpose for existing.
 

Vanguard_Ex

New member
Mar 19, 2008
4,687
0
0
monstersquad said:
It doesnt do us any good genetically, but we're far past that. If you look at other apes( we are apes, no use denying it), they're generally polygamous, and with chimps especially, there's a healthy amount of incest thrown in there as well. This is fine for their society, but it obviously wouldn't work in ours.

But culturally, monogamy is more important now than it ever was, considering the myriad of killer STDs out there, and just the sheer amount of people around make it more about safety and familiarity than anything else. However, I can also see how the generation of our parents really seemed to need that connection, while in our days, the implications surrounding marriage and monogamy are much different than they used to be.
Well fuck, I have been severely ninja'd. God damn.
 

Midnight Crossroads

New member
Jul 17, 2010
1,912
0
0
There is evidence that humankind evolved to be polygamous, but, then again, we also have enzymes specializing in digesting other humans. Take the evidence how you will. In this instance biology isn't forcing us to do anything.
 

Bara_no_Hime

New member
Sep 15, 2010
3,646
0
0
xxmyhero64xx said:
Ever since I heard word of my aunt and uncle getting divorced (two people who have been together since I can remember) I started wondering if human beings are really meant to stay with one other person till death. My parents are divorced after 20 years, I've seen relationships die after couples being together for years, and the divorce rate in America is 50%. It makes me wonder considering the physical goal of male humans is to spread the genetic seed as much as possible, does it do our species any good to just stay with one partner till death?
We're primates, and the males of our species have a moderate testicular size compared to their bodies.

Therefore we are capable of monogamy, but we aren't particularly good at it. We're the half-way point between Chimps (who will screw anything that moves) and Gorillas (who are monogamous).

Lesson of the day: Guys, it's not the size of your penis that counts. It's the size of your balls compared to the rest of your body. At least as far as monogamy is concerned.
 

Radoh

Bans for the Ban God~
Jun 10, 2010
1,456
0
0
Bara_no_Hime said:
xxmyhero64xx said:
Ever since I heard word of my aunt and uncle getting divorced (two people who have been together since I can remember) I started wondering if human beings are really meant to stay with one other person till death. My parents are divorced after 20 years, I've seen relationships die after couples being together for years, and the divorce rate in America is 50%. It makes me wonder considering the physical goal of male humans is to spread the genetic seed as much as possible, does it do our species any good to just stay with one partner till death?
We're primates, and the males of our species have a moderate testicular size compared to their bodies.

Therefore we are capable of monogamy, but we aren't particularly good at it. We're the half-way point between Chimps (who will screw anything that moves) and Gorillas (who are monogamous).

Lesson of the day: Guys, it's not the size of your penis that counts. It's the size of your balls compared to the rest of your body. At least as far as monogamy is concerned.
I love you so much Bara, that was a very entertaining read.
 

Falconsgyre

New member
May 4, 2011
242
0
0
Biologically, humans are serially monogamous with a high tendency for extra-pair copulations. Or, we like to stick with one person socially and then sleep behind their backs as much as we can without damaging that relationship. At least in the standard view of things. Humans are probably not sexually monogamous, in the sense that we're likely designed to sleep around a lot, but there is a general tendency to pick a mate and stick with them for a while. But not necessarily for life.

If you can spare the time Sex at Dawn has some pretty interesting arguments for why humans aren't actually monogamous at all, and evolved for group mating situations.

And for all the people saying that we're not "meant" to do anything and we should just ignore our underlying biological and psychological design: that's a little like saying we should all live in the ocean because we shouldn't be constrained by our inability to breathe water. Psychology imposes limits on us. If we willfully ignore these limits, then we will often end up unhappy. Biology doesn't "force" us to do anything in the sense that we're not literally compelled to do it, but not following its dictates may end up with you being miserable. That's why we look for mates in the first place.
 

Souplex

Souplex Killsplosion Awesomegasm
Jul 29, 2008
10,312
0
0
Most mammals aren't.
We're mammals.
You mostly see monogamy in egg-laying species.
 

Falconsgyre

New member
May 4, 2011
242
0
0
Bara_no_Hime said:
We're primates, and the males of our species have a moderate testicular size compared to their bodies.

Therefore we are capable of monogamy, but we aren't particularly good at it. We're the half-way point between Chimps (who will screw anything that moves) and Gorillas (who are monogamous).

Lesson of the day: Guys, it's not the size of your penis that counts. It's the size of your balls compared to the rest of your body. At least as far as monogamy is concerned.
Damn, I was going to say that.

Uh... if it matters, we're slightly on the side of monogamy. We're a little bit smaller than you'd expect from polygynists.