Are the forums too strict?
- Thread starter Ando85
- Start date
Recommended Videos
Punishments for controversial things might need more leniency, but when your post is clearly made to incite flaming or to straight out insult someone, you've brought mod wrath upon yourself.
I don't really know or care about your situation, but if the mods are really out to get you, why don't you... like... leave? Instead of putting up with an unfair system?Sir John the Net Knight said:
I don't know. That just seems to make more sense to me than crying about it.
I don't think they are strict enough. This is a place for intelligent discussion or atleast the promotion of it. If people can't be civil or express their opinion without being offensive and crude then they are free to take it to other websites that don't hold their forums to a higher standard like the Escapist does.
*jams a tin foil hat on his head*Sir John the Net Knight said:
I'm ready for anything now.
OT: I've only had mod wrath once and that was my own fault and at my own request. Sometimes I see the odd probation that I think it's a bit harsh but no one is perfect, also, the mods and staff aren't machines with set rules. Considering this [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/codeofconduct] is the entire rule list for the site then I think it is good they are vague. It leaves it up to the morality of a poster thinking "Hmmm is that appropriate to post". And if they think their probation/suspension/ban is unjust, they can always appeal to a staff or mod.
I've seen more than a few bad mod calls, both in the recent and distant past. I've also seen some pretty good work done as well. Frankly, it depends largely upon what moderator is actually doing stuff. Some are decent folk. Others love to hit people for the smallest things. Sad thing is that there really isn't a damn thing that can be done about it if you get hit by a bad mod call. They just seem to bury it and pretend it never happened. If the appeal system worked though and actually made bad mods be held to account for their actions... I'd be more forgiving. But it doesn't.
Normally i'd like strict modding, but here it regularly crosses the line to becoming too harsh, too unnecessary, too inconsistent, and too arbitrary. While some mods/staff seem like good people, as a whole I place little trust in them to do the right thing since they won't even punish their own when they break the rules.
Normally i'd like strict modding, but here it regularly crosses the line to becoming too harsh, too unnecessary, too inconsistent, and too arbitrary. While some mods/staff seem like good people, as a whole I place little trust in them to do the right thing since they won't even punish their own when they break the rules.
What he fails to tell you is that he was being 'satrical' several times in that thread and was caught insulting other users.Nihilism_Is_Bliss said:
Also, to anyone who believes they have a problem with any of the moderators, then please send in the appeal form that comes with your punishment or post in the mod team's group (Which can be found here [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/groups/chat/Moderation-Team]
If the appeal system worked then there wouldn't be a problem. I think the moderation here is generally a little too strict, but I can't really complain about that - if it bugged me that much I should probably just find a different community. The problem is that you'll always have some flux in opinion between mods, and if you're going for fairly strict anyway then the harsher penalties will go waaaay to far. Again, though, if the appeals worked the problem would go away.Yureina said:
-If- they worked, but it doesn't. My experience tells me that they don't even get word back to the person appealing, much less telling them what the results were. Yet another thing kept under tight wraps. The idea that transparency makes people more comfortable, even about bad news, appears to have been lost.Snork Maiden said:
"Strict" becomes much worse under those circumstances. Might as well just pretend the system doesn't even exist at all at that point. It pretty much doesn't from what i've seen.
I understand, but I don't deal with them, Spinwhiz does. Chances are, if you don't get it back, he's probably siding with the moderator. That said, there is still the moderation team chat, which is always open.Yureina said:
Lack of feedback, regardless of results, fractures trust. Considering a natural unease about strict authority that people would have, not to mention the specific query I made, that sort of thing is just wrong. You can't trust an organization that is enveloped in secrets and intrigue.maddawg IAJI said:
And as I just said, the Moderation Team is always open and you're bound to get feedback from there if you feel you don't understand. PMing the moderators and staff is another way. There are several ways to get feedback if you think one is ineffective (Which I don't agree with, but I don't really have time to get dragged out into a discussion about it.)Yureina said:
Nope. Not too strict. The mods keep the asshats at bay.
I like to have a place where I can have borderline civilized discussions (well, it's still the internet)
Captcha: etymba structure
Huh. Wonder what that is. Google.
No such thing exists
Edit: I'm disappointed that someone else already referred to annoying posters as asshats.
I like to have a place where I can have borderline civilized discussions (well, it's still the internet)
Captcha: etymba structure
Huh. Wonder what that is. Google.
No such thing exists
Edit: I'm disappointed that someone else already referred to annoying posters as asshats.