Are you an online loser?
- Thread starter Isla
- Start date
Recommended Videos
The only online game I play is Black Ops.
I'm not great at it. I end up with a negative K
more than a positive one. Some times I do really well and get a six or seven killstreak, sometimes I do terrible and get a six or seven deathstreak.
I very rarely get furious when I lose. However my teammates tend to annoy me more than the opposition. They never defend objectives. EVER!
I'm not great at it. I end up with a negative K
more than a positive one. Some times I do really well and get a six or seven killstreak, sometimes I do terrible and get a six or seven deathstreak. I very rarely get furious when I lose. However my teammates tend to annoy me more than the opposition. They never defend objectives. EVER!
I'm far more interested in a good game than I am in winning or losing. The only thing that annoys me is team games where team mates can't grasp the concept of objectives beyond 'kill everything'
Depends on the game, but the few I play(ed) I was below average *cof newbie cof* or not too epic f*cking awesome, just good.
Meh, I suck... huehuehueh
Meh, I suck... huehuehueh
I have a .854 win ratio in all online matches I've played on all systems.
When I do lose, I'm usually good about it. BUt if someone trash talks me alot, or I'm just having a bad day, I am deserving of the U MAD? trollface.
EDIT: Post made no sense after reading it again.
When I do lose, I'm usually good about it. BUt if someone trash talks me alot, or I'm just having a bad day, I am deserving of the U MAD? trollface.
EDIT: Post made no sense after reading it again.
When playing games to win (usually League of Legends), I rarely lose, as I play tank/carry to a good standard.
... But...
I rarely do any more, as it removes some of the fun. Roll on AP Tryndamere =D
... But...
I rarely do any more, as it removes some of the fun. Roll on AP Tryndamere =D
50/50 generally
It really depends though on the team I'm on/against how well I do. I used to dominate BF2 back in the day because I had 4 other mates with me who knew what they where doing. Otherwise it's just a random mess no matter the game (unless its 1vs1 of course)
It really depends though on the team I'm on/against how well I do. I used to dominate BF2 back in the day because I had 4 other mates with me who knew what they where doing. Otherwise it's just a random mess no matter the game (unless its 1vs1 of course)
I won a lot of the time on Uncharted 2 and Bad Company 2. However I am dreadful online on beat 'em ups like Tekken. This is why im possibly going to practice a lot before going online with Marvel vs Capcom 3.
I win alot of my games but even the best player will lose once in a while.I am happy to lose if i think i deserved to lose if the other team were better organised or just we higher skilled than us.But i keep playing them until i win as that is the only way to get better as your only as good the people you play.
So i like close well played matches.If i lose because of a player hacking or using a cheap weapon or tatic i get slighty annoyed but then i leave the lobby after the match is done and forget about it.
So i like close well played matches.If i lose because of a player hacking or using a cheap weapon or tatic i get slighty annoyed but then i leave the lobby after the match is done and forget about it.
Playing exclusively (online) on my PC, I can honestly say that I just don't have the reaction time to compete in the fast-paced FPS games.
Once I spot an opponent and my brain has finished loading the Point 'n' Click routines, I stand a 60% chance of being dead, and a 40% chance of the other dude being slower then I am.
When I actually get the mouse moving, I'm deadly accurate, and I'm also the type of gamer who buys the good hardware, and know how to combine mouse/pad and the like.
I've always been much better a large-scale shooters like Battlefield (Not this Bad Company atrocity) and ArmA 2, where situational awareness is king, and which strive to be a tad bit more realistic than your conventional CoD / MoH / BC generic-brown-shooter-deal.
That's not to say that I don't fancy the brown shooters though, when I just wanna shoot some guns by myself.
My K/D is usually hovering around 1.20-1.45, to some extent because I get lucky with my Killstreaks/CarePacks, or put distance between myself and the enemy by use of a high-powered scope and a .308+ bullet.
I never survive long as a Sniper though, 'cus once again, I'm too used to playing games that don't sport KillCams and where I can actually shoot from a full 500 yards or more, as opposed to covering narrow sniping lanes at a max range of 70 meters.
As to whether I'm a sore loser. Nah. I just shake it off and go back at it. Sure, if I get a 'Nade launcher to the face, or some guy pops me with the AK47u Rapid Fire in Black Ops, I'll get a little annoyed, but then I remember that the newbies gotta have a way to compete as well, and just keep playing.
Once I spot an opponent and my brain has finished loading the Point 'n' Click routines, I stand a 60% chance of being dead, and a 40% chance of the other dude being slower then I am.
When I actually get the mouse moving, I'm deadly accurate, and I'm also the type of gamer who buys the good hardware, and know how to combine mouse/pad and the like.
I've always been much better a large-scale shooters like Battlefield (Not this Bad Company atrocity) and ArmA 2, where situational awareness is king, and which strive to be a tad bit more realistic than your conventional CoD / MoH / BC generic-brown-shooter-deal.
That's not to say that I don't fancy the brown shooters though, when I just wanna shoot some guns by myself.
My K/D is usually hovering around 1.20-1.45, to some extent because I get lucky with my Killstreaks/CarePacks, or put distance between myself and the enemy by use of a high-powered scope and a .308+ bullet.
I never survive long as a Sniper though, 'cus once again, I'm too used to playing games that don't sport KillCams and where I can actually shoot from a full 500 yards or more, as opposed to covering narrow sniping lanes at a max range of 70 meters.
As to whether I'm a sore loser. Nah. I just shake it off and go back at it. Sure, if I get a 'Nade launcher to the face, or some guy pops me with the AK47u Rapid Fire in Black Ops, I'll get a little annoyed, but then I remember that the newbies gotta have a way to compete as well, and just keep playing.
I don't play online at all...so I have no idea; I'll just stick to being a winner in my Single Player games ^^
My FPS skills are entirely based on whether I've caught the enemy by surprise. In a straight-up fight, I usually get shot first.
And no, I don't care about losing, but I do care about BS deaths... I guess... which is why I love the killcam.
And no, I don't care about losing, but I do care about BS deaths... I guess... which is why I love the killcam.
Depends if I consider myself good at a game. Losing online at RTSs or MMORPG PvP then yeah, I rage. But FPSs? Noooo I suck at FPSs and take great pride in my 2:9 KD ratio and if I break even then I am delighted.
I don't habitually play online, so I don't know. I'm probably terrible, for the aforementioned reason. In terms of co-op, it's variable. I'm quite good at Firefight in Halo: Reach, but I routinely get outdone in almost every other game, bar racing ones.
I play a lot of FPSs and I'm pretty damn good at them. I don't care much about winning, I just focus on doing well myself.
On the whole, I consider myself just above average. In the top 40% kind of way. It mostly depends on my team as well though. I reserve a special kind of hate for people who quit mid match, especially if you're already losing, go down in a blaze of glory man! Plus I rarely boot anyone unless they are blatantly griefing in an unfunny way.
An exception would be once when I was playing Halo 3 online , my entire team ditched me on a Slayer map. Sniped and Hid my way to victory!
TL;DR - Kind of.
An exception would be once when I was playing Halo 3 online , my entire team ditched me on a Slayer map. Sniped and Hid my way to victory!
TL;DR - Kind of.