What?? No. If there is a good game I want, then I will buy it. Intentionally withholding products you want from yourself doesn't seem like a very good plan...
Oh trust me I know.Dexter111 said:The guys that made Singularity were my favorite FPS developer of all time, they did Hexen/Heretic, Soldier of Fortune, Star Trek Voyager: Elite Force, Star Wars: Jedi Knight 2+3 (JK2 is still my fav FPS but it's dead) and also Quake4 and Wolfenstein lately...dWintermut3 said:darksakul said:I never was interested in Activision games to begin with.
Only Activision game I own, Guitar Hero Metallica was given to me as a gift because my friends knew I was a Metallica fan.Chibz said:There's a VERY large area between "Call of Duty 53" and "Experimental Indie Title". What Activision releases is shovelware pure and simple. They're milking all their franchaises literally to death, to make short term profits. And once (for example) call of duty is no longer profitable (Due to their own poor business decisions) they'll drop it like that. *Finger snap*dWintermut3 said:If we have a problem with it we have only ourselves to blame for sucking up pablum. Boycotting activision would be shooting yourself in the foot to spite your leg if you enjoy the games they put out, if you don't, there's a massive indy community now thanks to new ways of publishing content and the magic that is the XBLA and Steam, buy indy if you want to see a change, but if you enjoy what the major studios are pushing out, and you know what, I often do, go for it.
This is no way to run a business, and this is not a business I will support.
You have a point, of course, but on the other hand some surprisingly innovative-but-still mainstream titles have come out of activision, like Singularity.
I did simplify, of course, and other publishers are proving you can be judicious in your use of a license and make serious bank with it (bungee, bioware, both have been careful not to oversell a good thing with Halo:reach being the confirmed last Halo title and Mass Effect being confirmed at three titles in a trilogy and no direct sequels).
What did Activision do? They fired almost half of the dev team: g4tv.com/thefeed/blog/post/698729/Activision-Confirms-Raven-Software-Layoffs.html
And now the rest is working on:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raven_Software
Call of Duty: Black Ops downloadable content (2011)
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 (in development)
well said as well. And that's the problem. Activision won't feel a thing, they have the residuals from World of Warcraft, which makes more money than most third-world countries. But as you hurt Activision you gut companies like Raven, who are locally-owned, socially-responsible corporations that are trying desperately to make it in a recession entertainment economy.Denariax said:The above message actually saddens me. I came in here to put a mediocre troll with the lines "Activision is boycottable? Eh." and only that, but to see Raven going downhill like that legitimately makes me want to cry.
Jedi Academy was a great game. PC-wise, it's STILL GOING on GameFront (No, I don't know why FileFront changed it's name). I used to work as staff there. It was, and still is, an easily modifiable game, yet had its own quirks to keep you interested.
Seeing them being forced to resort to the constant failure that I have always believed the CoD series is, makes me want to turn off the internet altogether.
That being said, I'm still not boycotting them. I can bet you Raven is being forced into this.
Now, I can see Bobby Kotick as a dick here, but the CEO being a some sort of money grubbing corporate psycho should't really be a game breaker. It's one thing when the CEO of a company acts like you would expect a CEO to act, namely as a money grubbing corporate psycho, but to boycott an entire company, a collective of thousands of people, working hard to make the best products they can, simply because the guy waving the cattle prod is annoying? That's like refusing to tip the slaves that make your clothes because you hate the guy that whips them. Now the hate for EA, for the grievous atrocities their marketing department has perpetrated in the name of profit? The horrible crimes they have committed against all the artists in the medium, both working for them, and for other people, to say nothing of the ones to come in the future, that have rippling effects across the entire gaming medium and in the way the world views such a new and budding art form? THAT is more than enough reason to boycott a company.Things they've said and done (many through Bobby Kottick):
The whole [http://www.bit-tech.net/news/gaming/2010/03/05/activision-responds-to-infinity-ward-lawsui/1] Infinity Ward [http://www.gamesradar.com/xbox360/modern-warfare-2/news/kotick-infinity-ward-founders-may-never-be-productive-or-successful-again-feelings-are-hurt/a-20100927102253716065/g-20090326142018906090] debacle. [http://www.wired.com/gamelife/2010/12/activision-infinity-ward-lawsuit/]
Pushing for more titles which they can "exploit on an annual basis" [http://www.penny-arcade.com/2007/12/5/]
"I would raise game prices higher if I could" [http://www.destructoid.com/kotick-i-would-raise-game-prices-higher-if-i-could-143049.phtml]
Hinting at franchises like Call of Duty becoming subscription-based [http://ps3.ign.com/articles/106/1068433p1.html]
And the Escapists' own Shamus Young wrote a fine article on Kotick's failure as a CEO [http://www.escapistmagazine.com/articles/view/columns/experienced-points/8169-Experienced-Points-Age-of-Kotick.2]
Dude, we're dealing with Activision here. If they had it their way they'd assign three different companies to the StarCraft franchise and release full sequels every 3 months!ModSquad said:I don't agree personally with Activision, they killed two great series. Guitar Hero and Tony Hawk. Why? Because they decide to cash-cow all our beloved games by releasing new unfinished titles and expansions every 6-12 months.
I'm glad that Blizzard is telling Activision to take a hike and stay out of their business, I don't want to see an expansion for Starcraft 2 coming out every single year to kill the franchise.
You mean the other 2/3 of the campaign that are each going to be released and likely priced as a full retail game?ModSquad said:I'm glad that Blizzard is telling Activision to take a hike and stay out of their business, I don't want to see an expansion for Starcraft 2 coming out every single year to kill the franchise.
This would have been my vote if there were vote buttons.Mikeyfell said:I've been boycotting Activision since before I knew they were evil.
I've been boycotting them because they're games suck
They screwed up D3 and SC2 by deciding to make them in the first place. The stories were closed sufficiently and the story of SC2 is just... Woefully, woefully inadequate and disappointing.Kadoodle said:My two least favorite companies are EA and Activision. They're both huge corporations, and they both employ asshole tactics to get their money. The difference between the two is that EA actually makes a good game every so often.
And lets face it: Activision would be dead without COD.