No. I have no interest in the MMO aspect and I refuse to pay mothly to play a singleplayer game. So if/when I can play it to experience the story without the added hassle of having to deal with monthly payments or other players, I'm in.
Okay, I put my hands up there but you do kind of prove my point; since this is apparently KoTORs' 3-10 condensed into one box, shouldn't it refer to KoTOR 2 first and foremost, to make the continuation clearer if nothing else?animehermit said:You are completely and 100% wrong on the first part, KOTOR 2 is referenced, albeit not as much as KOTOR 1 is, but it is there. The Exile is in the game, as is Revan.
Also, linking to old videos pointing out how the animations look bad? How about you link something that isn't 2 years old? The game looks and plays great and the animtions are some of the best I've seen for the genre. As far as I know they are all mo'capped as well, very high quality. It makes playing a melee class a lot of fun.
If you thought Coruscant was bad, you should've seen Tatooine. That's when you get your first mount (90%) and the zones are scaled to compensate (and then some). Tatooine is enormously huge and almost completely empty. Fair enough, I guess, it is a desert planet, but it's probably 3 Northrend zones in size and something like 20 quests (not counting bonus quests/series). You don't even visit half the planet's territory, because it's for the other faction.VladG said:Sorry to be disappointing OP, but it's really not that different from WoW... the grind is worse (the first 5 hours of play were ok, the next 15 were like pulling teeth, and I swear Coruscant was the WORST experience I've ever had in any mmo. Imagine the very bland and repetitive dungeons from Dragon Age 2 but without the interesting characters and sense of progression and story and the usual mmo-ish "kill x number of y"). And you have to do that with EVERY new character on the republic side.