Are You Put Off PC Gaming...

Recommended Videos

Pimppeter2

New member
Dec 31, 2008
16,479
0
0
Seeing as I am a pc gamer.. no

I mean you should look at my custom Oblvion game, mods are pure awesomeness

but I do like my 360 alot
 

dragonburner

New member
Feb 21, 2009
475
0
0
The fact that games on the computer sometimes won't work, will cease to work, take up tons of space, and slow my computer down are major factors for not playing games on the PC. I also dislike the major costs and many of the games.
 

Markgraf

New member
Apr 1, 2009
295
0
0
JimmyBassatti said:
fix-the-spade said:
Gilbert Munch said:
... because of the incredibly high costs? Or the fact that there's a chance that a game wont be able to work on your system? Because I sure as hell am.
In a word. Nope.

I spent just over £1000 on my gaming rig in 2004. Excepting a new graphics card it's the same PC I play games on now. Since then I've avoided shelling out for the Xbox, 360, PS3 and Wii as rwwell as never having paid more than £15 for a newly released game.

I admit the starting cost was an eye wateringly huge amount of money for a games machine. But since then I've avoided spending more than double that in consoles, peripherals and overpriced games/service subscriptions.

I wouldn't get into console gaming now, it's getting closer and closer to PC gaming (both cost and complication wise) but failing to offer the advantages.


As for games.

Half Life + mods
Counter Strike 1.6
Quake 3 arena
Unreal Tournament
Day of Defeat
Team Fortress Classic.

All the online gaming you will ever need and shoud all run fine on low end/older hardware.
If I did happen to get Half Life, GMod, Counter Strike, etc., is it difficult to run Half-Life? Because my dad has a newer computer, and I was hoping to start playing Half-Life on it, but I wanted to know if it's going to be a *****.
The first Half-Life can be easily run at max settings by anything built within the last 5 years, heck, even by older equipment considering the core game has been out for more than 10 years now.
 

The Political Gamer

New member
Oct 12, 2008
594
0
0
You do have to know what "most" of these ports are and what they do.
[http://fc04.deviantart.com/fs41/i/2009/031/2/2/Computer_hardware_poster_1_7_by_Sonic840.jpg]
 

Markgraf

New member
Apr 1, 2009
295
0
0
JimmyBassatti said:
Markgraf said:
JimmyBassatti said:
fix-the-spade said:
Gilbert Munch said:
... because of the incredibly high costs? Or the fact that there's a chance that a game wont be able to work on your system? Because I sure as hell am.
In a word. Nope.

I spent just over £1000 on my gaming rig in 2004. Excepting a new graphics card it's the same PC I play games on now. Since then I've avoided shelling out for the Xbox, 360, PS3 and Wii as rwwell as never having paid more than £15 for a newly released game.

I admit the starting cost was an eye wateringly huge amount of money for a games machine. But since then I've avoided spending more than double that in consoles, peripherals and overpriced games/service subscriptions.

I wouldn't get into console gaming now, it's getting closer and closer to PC gaming (both cost and complication wise) but failing to offer the advantages.


As for games.

Half Life + mods
Counter Strike 1.6
Quake 3 arena
Unreal Tournament
Day of Defeat
Team Fortress Classic.

All the online gaming you will ever need and shoud all run fine on low end/older hardware.
If I did happen to get Half Life, GMod, Counter Strike, etc., is it difficult to run Half-Life? Because my dad has a newer computer, and I was hoping to start playing Half-Life on it, but I wanted to know if it's going to be a *****.
The first Half-Life can be easily run at max settings by anything built within the last 5 years, heck, even by older equipment considering the core game has been out for more than 10 years now.
And what about Half-Life 2?
I love you guys at the Escapist xD
I don't know where I'd be if it wasn't for you guys...
It should be able to run on most computers today. The Source Engine is very low-end friendly and scales well. However, don't expect it to run at higher settings should your computer struggle with games released around 2004-06.
 

TaborMallory

New member
May 4, 2008
2,382
0
0
No, I prefer PC gaming to a console. I'm very willing to go the extra mile to buy a high-end PC.

As for low-end games, I'd suggest:
-Age of Empires 1 and 2
-Starcraft
-Diablo 1 and 2
-Age of Mythology on low settings
-Quake
-Fallout 1 and 2
-Myst, and the sequel Riven. There are no other games like these. They're cheap to buy and definitely worth it.
 

Danny Ocean

Master Archivist
Jun 28, 2008
4,148
0
0
KSarty said:
I still play all the original C&C games as well the original Wing Commander games on my Vista rig, those games 15 and 18 years old respectively.
How? I've been trying to get Command and Conquer to work for a while but to no avail.It installs fine, but I think I need to enable compatability mode and I don't know how. Vista Home Premium SP2.

Woo! Tech support!
 

Markgraf

New member
Apr 1, 2009
295
0
0
Danny Ocean said:
KSarty said:
I still play all the original C&C games as well the original Wing Commander games on my Vista rig, those games 15 and 18 years old respectively.
How? I've been trying to get Command and Conquer to work for a while but to no avail.It installs fine, but I think I need to enable compatability mode and I don't know how. Vista Home Premium SP2.

Woo! Tech support!
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/using/helpandsupport/learnmore/appcompat.mspx

Check out the third section of that article. (Yes, it's also applicable to Vista.)
 

tenlong

New member
Apr 26, 2009
548
0
0
TheBlobThing said:
Pendragon9 said:
I'm put off by the snobs that think they're the gods of gaming. Seriously, get over yourselves.
This thing where PC gamers consider themselves "the gods of gaming", where does it actually come from? I've only ever seen Yahtzee complain about it in ZP videos, never encountered in earnest.
Consider yourself lucky.
 

DeadlyYellow

New member
Jun 18, 2008
5,141
0
0
For all my hacking on the thing, it served me well. Most new games that I want typically have a console release (yeah yeah, no mods, blah blah blah. I can make do without nude models and unreasonably sized breasts.)

I have an aging machine from 2006. Needs a ram boost and more hard drive space to run anything from this year smoothly, but it still means a dip in visual quality and effects.
 

Arkhangelsk

New member
Mar 1, 2009
7,702
0
0
I'm sadly a console player due to not being able to afford some upgrades for my computer. Although, games are fun for console. Not everything demands a mouse and a keyboard. Only FPS's and other precision games.
 

Brnin8

New member
Jul 17, 2009
562
0
0
lacktheknack said:
Mine's 3 years old Vista with small upgrades... and it runs top of the line just fine. Maybe you're not maintaining it right?
Thats what it sounds like to me I have an almost 1 year old gaming machine that has Vista on it (until windows seven is out lol) and I can run anything I want smoothly.
Also I personally like Vista, never had any problems that weren't fixed with an update.
 

Clashero

New member
Aug 15, 2008
2,143
0
0
Credge said:
Clashero said:
Actually, PC Elitists upgrade every year. Normal people with normal budgets figure that they're already going to buy a computer, so they might as well buy one which can play games. I'm playing on a laptop (again, elitists will tell you that there is no such thing as a gaming laptop) with a 2,13 dual core processor, 4GB of RAM and an NVidia GeForce 9600 GT. If this is all gibberish to you, it means Mass Effect runs faster and better-looking than on a 360, Crysis on High/Very High settings, as well as functioning as an entertainment system. I don't intend to get an upgrade for the next 4 or 5 years. All this cost me $1000.
I'd also like to mention, not for you but for those that don't know, that if you didn't get that same PC in laptop form (I.E. a desktop) it would probably cost you half as much, give or take $100-200. However, you don't get a monitor or keyboard with that money... which really leaves you about only $200 behind the laptop depending on what size you use.

The plus to a desktop is that you can use the same monitor for as long as it works, so you save in the long run over a laptop.

That's sort of the point of a PC. Choice. I can choose to get the best stuff and pay a lot more or I can wait a year for the best stuff to be mediocre, get it, and be just as able to play new games than if I would have spent a crap ton of money on new things.

Because, really, the only true expensive bit of PC gaming are video cards, and they generally come in leap advancements instead of gradual advancements.
True, I could've gotten either a better desktop PC for the same price or the same PC, but in deskptop form, for less money. But I really needed the laptop for university (Software Engineering gets a lot easier once you go mobile, especially since now my parents can use the desktop computer while I program or play on this laptop)
 

hotacidbath

New member
Mar 2, 2009
1,046
0
0
I already spend too much time on my computer, if I put games on it I would never leave my room. At least with my consoles I have to wander into the living room to play.
 

Low Key

New member
May 7, 2009
2,503
0
0
Where most users are put off about PC gaming is terms like BIOS, overclocking, etc. The average PC user is not tech savvy enough to build a PC from scratch, and most PCs already built don't have the proper processor, RAM, and/or graphics card, all of which are very expensive when going for high end gaming.
 

Fallingwater

New member
Mar 20, 2009
177
0
0
No, I am not. PC gaming costs are no longer as high as they were in the days of yore; it is now possible to build a proper gaming rig, capable of running everything on the market in at least medium detail, for ?500 (less if you skimp on some stuff and build your computer in a beer case). And the added benefits (modding, mouse controls, upgradability, proper savegames, and y'know, the ability to do a whole lot of other things) more than make up for the higher price, even if you buy a pre-built computer.
In fact, I'm constantly amazed at how people can like consoles, so very limited that they are.