Art or science?

[Ace of Spades]

Are those to really so different as to warrant a choice between them?

Your avatar perfectly fits your comment. It makes me want to set up a second accout purely for posting questions on threads.

Thank you (Even though I forgot to put a w in the word 'two')

 

[AngloDoom]

Science: Good for progression of the species and for survival.
Art: Good for keeping you amused and sane and to ponder things that aren't quite in your knowledge.

Art can excite the mind and make one search for answers using science, science can find new ways to create and to portray art. I really am having a difficult time answering this question.

Overall, I'd rather be stupid and happy with my art than knowledgeable and never quite content with my science. I'd rather die in a blaze of glory and fun than in a successful rocking-chair in an empty manor with no windows.

 

[Voodoomancer]

They're the one and the same, I say, one and the same.

 

[Kirkby]

In my eyes Science is the most important thing ever. Now dont get me wrong art is very important but Science keeps us alive to appreciate art. That and theres some things science can show you that art can never hope to match! I dare anyone to look at and fully understand the size of the eagle nebular and not feel humbled in new ways.

ALSO

Science is more awesome, I don't know about important. Science students are cooler and more down to earth than arts students. Even arts men want our science ladies, and YOU AREN'T HAVING THEM!!!

Ur my new favourite person on the escapist = P *coughs* definatly has nothing to do with me doing science *coughs*

 

[Lukeje]

Science is an art. Anyone who doesn't think this obviously hasn't studied a science to a high enough level.

 

[Thedayrecker]

Lately, Science. Good art's been dead for a while, with few exceptions.

 

[Pips]

Why can't we have both?
I think both are equally important to the growth of a society, but as for where my particular talents lie, I have to say art. Literary arts, at least.

 

[9Darksoul6]

"Smart" people do science;
"Less smart" people do art;
"Smart" people can also do art;
"Less smart" people cannot do science;
Artists cannot live without science; scientists can perfecly live without art;
Which one is a superior teaching, art or science? Which one is more important?
I'd say science.

 

[LittleChone]

Why not combine the two?

 

[CaptVickHartnell]

Why is this even a debate? And not just this question, I mean the whole Art vs. Science malarky. What's with the 'vs.'. I've always loved both. I'm studying biological science, and in my free time I write draw and sometimes act. I'm equally passionate about both and I couldn't imaginr life without either of them.

 

[Blue_vision]

This statement is also predestined to be torn apart with the same arguments I made. The next time, please state explicitly that you mean this in the way you described and obviously with consumerism in mind...

I stand by this. Advancements in art > basically any current possible advancements in biomechanics, cybernetics, housing, and transportation. Perhaps different connotations once it's in proper context, but I don't believe I'm saying something entirely different.

i always saw it like this:

Science is an Art
and
Art is a Science

Well, I'd say that the second is a lot less exclusive is the first. While there are scientific methodologies that can work to make true art, art requires interpretation. But then again, Science is an art, though that's probably just because of the open definition of what an art is...
But I like the spirit of the argument! A cookie for the good sir.

 

[MrMixelPixel]

Meh, I'm really not that good at any form of art... xD.

However, I find science very interesting. I hope that I've accumulated a decent amount of scientific knowledge because of it.

I choose... SCIENCE.

 

[fundayz]

How is this even a question?

Sure art is nice, it helps us express ourselves and entertain others but that's about it.

Science saves lives, science makes our lives easier, science expands our horizons.

80% of the improvements of life expectancy in the last century are due to better medicine which is fundamentally based on science.

 

[thethingthatlurks]

Art is not needed in science! Well, almost not needed. We did need to figure out that chalk can write on blackboards, but that's essentially it. Whether art or science is of greater benefit to society is also not a question for debate. The mere fact that somebody can read comments and add theirs here proves how important science is.
On a more personal level, I'd say it's a 1:3 mix for art to science. Curiosity spurs on science, and art relieves stress. I love music (classical), and I can appreciate the amount of work put into art. Still, no work of art will ever save people from disease, solve world hunger, leave earth, explore the subatomic realm, or build a network which allows some 2 billion people to interact.

 

[Nova Helix]

Always a mature way to handle a debate.

Did I ever say that science is stupid and shouldn't exist? No. I'm just saying that the things that truly make people happy are, for the most part, "arts," and I would prefer a society that had arts but no science over a society that had science without art.

It might just be me but it would be hard to be happy when you're dieing at 35 from an excruciating illness that science can prevent, or starving because you don't have science to preserve your food.

Sure, I could be dying from a terrible illness without science. But I think I'd be happier to life a fulfilling life aided by wonderful art and have it end at 35, rather than have an art-less life and live to be 80 or something.

If you actually think about it you could not live or have much art without science. Humans do not have the capability to live without tools or shelter (science) and the only art that there would be is taking a stone a scratching it on a wall. There would be no fire for charcoal, no paint, no tools for sculptures and of course no digital art.

Art cannot exists without science.

 

[badgersprite]

Without either one of them, we'd lose what makes being human so great.

That's like asking whether air or water is more important. Without one, you die. Without the other, you die faster.

Well said, and I second this motion. I'm an arts student in a family of scientists and mathematicians; I see both as important, and, honestly, we probably wouldn't have either one without the other. The mixture of imagination and logic is where the best discoveries and inspiration come from, in my opinion.

 

[Sebenko]

I've never described an art student as adorably geeky.

That should tell you everything you need to know.

 

[Anchupom]

Science is damn logical and useful.
Art is expression of the soul.
And Extra Credits viewers all know that videogames are art, so....
ARGH DAMNIT.

I choose Ninjitsu. That's the most important, you move fluidly and know how to break peoples' necks.

 

[EarthIsFlat]

"Smart" people do science;
"Less smart" people do art;
"Smart" people can also do art;
"Less smart" people cannot do science;
Artists cannot live without science; scientists can perfecly live without art;
Which one is a superior teaching, art or science? Which one is more important?
I'd say science.

Not everyone can be a great artist, and not everyone can be a great scientist. Yet, anyone can become a good artist, and anyone can become a good scientist. With enough practice and effort that is.