Artists worst album.

Recommended Videos

Mr.Mattress

Level 2 Lumberjack
Jul 17, 2009
3,645
0
0
Rawberry101 said:
I'd say that the worst Beatles album (not EP) is With the Beatles, almost no innovation that could be found on any of their other albums.

And any Pink Floyd, for all their lofty heights, has Ummagumma. Awful, awful, garbage. Nuff said. Most of the stuff they wrote between Piper at the Gates of Dawn and Atom Heart Mother is pretty bad.
Firstly, dude, I love Piper at the Gates of Dawn! Syd Barrett is kind of a musical genius in the way he makes music. I will agree that Ummagumma is their worst though, but this was their transitional phase; away from the Psych Rock they started with Syd on and into the Prog Rock we all know and love them for.

2nd, the worst Beatle's album to me has gotta be "Help!" Yes, "Yesterday" is an amazing piece, but what more can you say about it? Songs like "Help!" and "Your Going to Loose That Girl" sound uninspired (Especially in the back-up singing), it had their worst cover song choices ("Act Naturally" and "Dizzy Miss Lizzy"), it had the weakest George Harrison songs I've ever heard ("You Like Me Too Much" and "I Need You"), and I can't stand "Tell Me What You See". Yes it started the Beatles' innovation, but it's just plain unenjoyable, at least to me. The only thing it has to it is "Yesterday".

Other then that, I can't think of anything else.
 

Ljs1121

New member
Mar 17, 2011
1,113
0
0
Finding Beauty in Negative Spaces by Seether is mine.

There just weren't that many memorable songs. If anything, I think the main reason most people bought it was because it contained Fake It.
 

Gmans uncle

New member
Oct 17, 2011
570
0
0
OlasDAlmighty said:
A Momentary Lapse in Reason is my pick for the worst Pink Floyd Album. Without Roger Waters they just went to shit.

For Led Zeppelin it's definitely In Through the Out Door.
I agree 100% that Pink Floyd sucked without Roger, but I've say the Division Bell was much worse then AMLOP

OT: For Daft Punk, I'd say Human After All, it wasn't even close to DP's normal standards, and the only worthwhile tracks off that album were done so much better on Alive 2007 that I just find listening to the thing pointless.
 

Random Argument Man

New member
May 21, 2008
6,011
0
0
Aylaine said:
Imthatguy said:
Coldplay's Mylo Xyloto gets my vote here. It's sound was unlike their earlier works, so much so that I could not get into it at all. After listening to the entire album 4 times, desperate to find a song I liked, I had given up. It's quite peculiar too because I adore every other album they've put out. :x
I had trouble thinking about an album and then you popped up with.....that... What made me sad is they followed "Viva la Vida" with....that...I think the closest of liking a song on that album was "Princess of China". I got bored rather quickly.

I rather listen to the previous albums. I always get suprised here and there.
 

Vault101

I'm in your mind fuzz
Sep 26, 2010
18,863
15
43
Nazulu said:
This style is nothing unique, nothing clever, and especially not more grown-up (I still can't believe you said that).
.
not more grown up?...I'd say thousands suns was more grown up than "IIIIIIIII'VE BECOME SO NUUUUUUUUUUUUUUMB" but that said it weather or not a song is "mature" is subjective
OhJohnNo said:
my problem with linkin park is it seems like people are hating on them (thousand suns in particular) because they are different..and I'm not understanding why

I dont see why peopel hate change so much, I welcome artists branching out

and seriously its not like linkin park could keep that emo crap up forever
 

Imthatguy

New member
Sep 11, 2009
587
0
0
Vegetunks9000 said:
Morbid Angel - illud divinum insanus

This album was just horrendous compared to the earlier albums. Massive fan backlash to
To be fair it was shitty for a Morbid Angel album most bands would kill to sound like that.

Hylke Langhout said:
Vault101 said:
..and they REALLY dont like lulu

in fact I've never seen so much universal hatred of one album
Here is my 5 minute thesis on why Lulu is a terrible album:
Dear 'Ktulu' I knew the conspiracy was deep but.... he was abducted by Table Aliens?

 

Ron Alphafight

New member
Oct 10, 2012
40
0
0
Lulu was definitely worse than Saint Anger.

Don't know if it was their worst album, but Chinese Democracy by Guns n Roses was pretty bad. As a matter of fact, it was released while I was working at Best Buy and sold horrendously. Two years later, I quit and they still had bins full of the album, and had put them on clearance for 99 cents. Still nobody bought them.
 

WaReloaded

New member
Jan 20, 2011
587
0
0
Hylke Langhout said:
I don't know which Metallica album was worse, St.Anger or Lulu.
I loved Lulu, Lou Reed is an idol of mine.

OT: I can find something to enjoy about most of the albums I listen to. Obviously some are better than others but I can usually appreciate the effort that goes into the recording and production of an album.
 

Tanis

The Last Albino
Aug 30, 2010
5,264
0
0
Orgy: Punk_Statik_Paranoia
-Completely WRONG direction for the band.

Black Sabbath - Anything after Ozzy/Dio
 
Mar 26, 2008
3,429
0
0
Just when I thought The Offspring couldn't create an album worse than "Rise and Fall, Rage and Grace", they come out with "Days Go By". If it wasn't for the re-doing of Dirty Magic it would be absolutely abysmal. Interestingly enough "Ignition" is their best album IMO.
 

DugMachine

New member
Apr 5, 2010
2,566
0
0
Innocent Bystander said:
Oh shit, I forgot. Korn: The Path Of Totality. Whether or not Korn is really a "good" band is up for debate, but they did a freakin' dub step album. With Skrillex. Goddamn. From what I've heard of the album "stand out" tracks, nothing blends properly. Jonathan Davis' usual growl doesn't work with the wubs from Skrillex. And I actually enjoy Skrillex, to a point. It's just... distressing. And all these people I know absolutely love the album, and play it constantly at parties.
Yeah it's just one of those albums... I never even listened to Korn and THAT'S what I decided to start on. Not a good start to say the least. I kind of like "Get up! feat. Skrillex" though as I enjoy Skrillex's more experimental stuff.

Rest sounds just so out of place... his voice doesn't work for that type of music imo.
 

Ieyke

New member
Jul 24, 2008
1,402
0
0
Vault101 said:
Nazulu said:
This style is nothing unique, nothing clever, and especially not more grown-up (I still can't believe you said that).
.
not more grown up?...I'd say thousands suns was more grown up than "IIIIIIIII'VE BECOME SO NUUUUUUUUUUUUUUMB" but that said it weather or not a song is "mature" is subjective
OhJohnNo said:
my problem with linkin park is it seems like people are hating on them (thousand suns in particular) because they are different..and I'm not understanding why

I dont see why peopel hate change so much, I welcome artists branching out

and seriously its not like linkin park could keep that emo crap up forever
The style has changed from what made Linkin Park brilliant to something far more generic. THAT is what people don't like.
Don't confuse the content of their songs with the style.
They have plenty of emo stuff after Meteora in a different style.
They've also sporadically provided examples that proved that their better original style can be applied equally well to non-emo stuff.

I don't care WHAT they're singing about, it's the unique brilliance of their original STYLE that they need to switch back to.
They can sing about shopping at the mall for all I care, as long as it sounds awesome.
 

Vault101

I'm in your mind fuzz
Sep 26, 2010
18,863
15
43
Ieyke said:
The style has changed from what made Linkin Park brilliant to something far more generic. THAT is what people don't like.
Don't confuse the content of their songs with the style.
They have plenty of emo stuff after Meteora in a different style.
They've also sporadically provided examples that proved that their better original style can be applied equally well to non-emo stuff.

I don't care WHAT they're singing about, it's the unique brilliance of their original STYLE that they need to switch back to.
They can sing about shopping at the mall for all I care, as long as it sounds awesome.
thousand suns sounded hardly generic to me...

in fact aside form M2M I honestly can't tell the difference
 

Jfswift

Hmm.. what's this button do?
Nov 2, 2009
2,396
0
41
I really enjoy Megadeth, although I just can't into get one of their newer albums, "Risk".

Edit: oh and that Jay-Z / Linkin Park crossover album was just awful. It was an interesting idea but I don't think it sounded very good tbh.
 

Nazulu

They will not take our Fluids
Jun 5, 2008
6,242
0
0
Vault101 said:
OhJohnNo said:
my problem with linkin park is it seems like people are hating on them (thousand suns in particular) because they are different..and I'm not understanding why

I dont see why peopel hate change so much, I welcome artists branching out

and seriously its not like linkin park could keep that emo crap up forever
It really shouldn't be that difficult to understand. As we all know some people only prefer certain styles, while others like to hear more ambitious work.

I preferred that emo crap because it's so much tougher, more memorable and most of the melody's were good. This so called meaningful Linkin Park is wimpy and lame in comparison. Of course I'm going to find it disappoiting.

Unless your talking about people just hating change altogether, then I just ignore them like I ignore the people who suddenly hate a song because it came on TV.
 

Nazulu

They will not take our Fluids
Jun 5, 2008
6,242
0
0
OhJohnNo said:
Nazulu said:
Oh no, we better not annoy you. Stop being sensitive. It's not like you're being judged.

The thing about having a story to the album is it has to be good if it's to catch peoples attention, so it obviously it hasn't got the greatest appeal. The main problem isn't people focusing on the "story and feel" of the album however, but that they have changed their style so much that of course it's going to leave previous fans out of the loop. And not only that but the melody's are really weak compared to their previous albums. This style is nothing unique, nothing clever, and especially not more grown-up (I still can't believe you said that).

Can you really blame fans from the previous Linkin Park albums that they want something similar to their original style? Remember, most of us are only interested in certain things, just like you and your story's.

By the way, albums don't have to be a fucking story! Music is entertainment remember, it doesn't have to connect to be great. That's only your personal preferance, so drop it. "An artistic statement they should be", as soon as you throw any shoulds in, you're automatically wrong by default. If there is to be any shoulds, it's that the artist 'should' be allowed to be as creative as they damn well want. This is also followed by people 'should' be allowed to criticise them however they damn well want.

If you like their new style, good for you, but don't expect everyone to listen to it as an "an artistic statement" (when you say stuff like this, it makes the whole art subject look bad) if they can only enjoy some of the songs.
Oh don't worry, you can keep annoying me if you want. There's a world of difference between "annoyed" and "offended". That particular viewpoint, though? Always annoys me whenever it comes up. What do you call that, a "pet peeve"? It's one of the few things I am capable of getting passionate about on the internet, and it looks like this time, that overrode my usual "sigh, and live and let live" policy.

//RANT MODE ACTIVATED

I suppose I'm just bitter that my absolute favourite kind of music has been scarce since well before I was born - I blame the "Punk Revolution" for that. Then when Linkin Park, of all bands, releases a well thought-out and coherent concept album that's one of the best art albums I've heard... of course, half the fanbase very vocally hates it, screaming "CHANGE BACK! CHANGE BAAAACK!" because it didn't have enough "awesome" guitar riffs or sing-along choruses for them to mosh to. To me it seems like the same kind of issue as with other media - you get the types who only enjoy action movies with lots of explosions, and the types that will only read romance novels, but music seems to be the only medium where people actually act proud - and occasionally snooty, though thankfully not here - about these tastes. I'm well aware this makes me an insufferable elitist, but... I hate that.

So the melodies are (in your opinion) weaker than on their other albums - so what? What if they weren't going for melody? Why should a band have to go for melodic content? And by the way, I'm not just interested in stories - I on't know where I you got that from, because while I like music that tells a story, I also like songs/albums with melody, songs/albums that evoke some sort of emotional reaction, songs/albums (usually albums in this case) that can transport me to another world, etc. What most annoys me is that melodies and the occasional emotional reaction are what people define as "good music" nowadays without a second glance, and are loudly unwilling to accept any other form. So of course, when a mainstream band releases an album that isn't meant to specifically be either of those, people dismiss it as "pretentious" (god, I hate that term - it's so misused) and "dull" and just straight "bad music" without considering it further.

I suppose Cracked.com was right - popular music does have less variety in this age. We've gone from the 70s, where bands like Mike Oldfield and Pink Floyd can reach number 1 alongside bands like Led Zeppelin and Wings, to now where only bands like the last two are considered valid (save for the odd outlier album, of course, like Kid A). And sure, some of my favourite bands are catchy and melodic pop bands from today, but I so wish people would voluntarily exercise thought about the music they consume and accept other kinds too.

//RANT MODE DEACTIVATED

tl;dr People don't like what I like and this fact makes me feel first annoyed, then just sort of sad and depressed. I suppose one day I'll move into grudging acceptance. Maybe you can help me with that.
Wasn't expecting that. Frankly, I reckon you should be thrilled that you finally found an album you enjoyed these days and not let any one else ruin your fun. Honestly, I'm kinda the same in that I really love progressive rock but the 70's were easily the peak for it, and I wasn't around to take it all in like I wish I could. I find it annoying as well that there isn't more different kinds of music mixing up on TV, radio, etc.

I stated why I prefer the previous Linkin Park albums, not that they have to be more melodic. I can't actually enjoy music I find weak as piss or really lame. I'm not going to get any emotion out of it at all. So, like I said, can you really blame those who preferred the previous style?

Another thing we have in common is I also hate the word "pretentious" since I know some people that use it to describe everything. And funnily enough, you also have another thing in common with those who are dismissive. They also hate it when no one likes what they like, that's why they can be so judgemental, to get what they like again.

I usually don't bother though because I doubt they can do what they used to, another thing I think we both agree on.