Ask a Christian Theologian

Recommended Videos

Lukeje

New member
Feb 6, 2008
4,048
0
0
Trace2010 said:
Consider:

B) One huge argument is that "the DNA of man and the DNA of chimps/gorillas only differ by 2% so it is assumed that they have a common ancestor." To that I respond, "ask any astrophysicist what a 2% variation in the angle a rocket is fired will do when you are trying to get to the outer planets". You'll hit the moon, and maybe you'll hit Mars, but you are going to miss the outer planets completely.
You seem to be missing the point that we know where the 2% variation lies, and that it is perfectly plausible for the mutations to have arisen over the timescales given in the way that they did.
And I don't see what the analogy is supposed to represent? That '2% can be a lot'? A 2% change in DNA is exactly what it is, a 2% change.
 

Dechef

New member
Feb 7, 2008
322
0
0
Trace2010 said:
If God is scientifically proven, then people don't need faith.
If People don't have faith, they cannot be saved.
ENDGAME.
I have faith in my own ability to make the decisions that are right for me.
There's your faith.
 

CIA

New member
Sep 11, 2008
1,013
0
0
PatientGrasshopper said:
CIA said:
PatientGrasshopper said:
Isaac Dodgson said:
PatientGrasshopper said:
It can't be the same God if you disagree on the aspect of that God on What part of HIM is God or not. That differs from different denominations of Christians in that they agree on who God is in this aspect but just disagree on certain little things
So you're saying because one group believes that god is more than one entity, where as another believes that the SAME god is not more than one entity, that they both can't be the same god? Try thinking a little more abstract and less closed minded about it, and I mean such with the utmost respect. Religious debates tend to piss me off, because many I've had these debates with are closed minded, and stubborn in their ways, and I don't believe you to be so, sir.
If I say someone is left handed and you say they are right handed and they are not ambidextrous only one of us is right. We can't both be right.
Personally I think that all religions are worshiping the same thing: Life. I feel more alive thinking there is nothing after this than anyone who clings to relligion.

EDIT: So yeah its all the same god.
How am I being closed minded? I am trying to understand how separate religions with different beliefs can believe in the same God?
I never called you closed minded.

They don't worship the same god per se, just the same idea of a higher power.

Or something like that.
 

Trace2010

New member
Aug 10, 2008
1,019
0
0
Half of what you said was insightful - the other half proved my point.
You cannot refute predestination from a Biblical perspective.

Proverbs 16:4
"The LORD works out everything for his own ends?
even the wicked for a day of disaster"

Proverbs 16:9
"In his heart a man plans his course,
but the LORD determines his steps."[/quote]

Ok if predestination works the way I think you are trying to say it works then what is the point of evangelism? Those who are saved are saved those who aren't, aren't and there is nothing you can do to change that, at least according to what the Calvinist belief of predestination.[/quote]

MY MAIN PROBLEM WITH PREDESTINATION:

Think of the parable of the workers:

Do I really want to go up to God (or Jesus) and say- "I thought you had everything lined out and predetermined, so I missed the opportunity to hire more workers." ???

REMEBER: As a religion, we believe, the choices we make as Christians do not just affect our Salvation, but the salvation of others as well.
 

TheBadass

New member
Aug 27, 2008
704
0
0
Trace2010 said:
If that's what you believe, fine.
Just don't tell me it's a fact.

We're not talking about quantifiable fact here. God exists outside of the boundaries of human logic and reasoning.

j-e-f-f-e-r-s said:
I have a question: How can God be so arrogant as to stake his religion on nothing more than faith, yet be willing to damn for eternity all those who do not follow the 'one true path' of christianity? If you're going to damn to hell all those who don't believe in Jesus, isn't it up to you to give people the best damn evidence possible that you exist and he was the 'Son of God'?
First of all, as a Christian I am more concerned about myself. No, I am not damming anybody; I can't measure the inside of anyone's heart and mind, only God can- and I trust He will be a better judge.

Second of all: NO- if God comes out and proves He exists, that takes away the ability for mankind to need faith, thus completely erasing all of the work done trying to save His people.

If God is scientifically proven, then people don't need faith.
If People don't have faith, they cannot be saved.
ENDGAME.
Why is faith needed for people to be saved again? Seems a bit unfair, considering that some people around the world are taught from a young age to dissaprove of the concept, thereby becoming automatically damned for all eternity.
 

Trace2010

New member
Aug 10, 2008
1,019
0
0
Lukeje said:
Trace2010 said:
Consider:

B) One huge argument is that "the DNA of man and the DNA of chimps/gorillas only differ by 2% so it is assumed that they have a common ancestor." To that I respond, "ask any astrophysicist what a 2% variation in the angle a rocket is fired will do when you are trying to get to the outer planets". You'll hit the moon, and maybe you'll hit Mars, but you are going to miss the outer planets completely.
You seem to be missing the point that we know where the 2% variation lies, and that it is perfectly plausible for the mutations to have arisen over the timescales given in the way that they did.
And I don't see what the analogy is supposed to represent? That '2% can be a lot'? A 2% change in DNA is exactly what it is, a 2% change.
Considering the intellectual ability and processing capacity of people, chimps, and gorillas, I'd say two percent is quite a lot...don't you?

They actually taught a chimp one time to play all 12 major scales on a xylophone. He can't do that rather well- just don't ask him to sight read or play in a symphony any time soon.
 

Lukeje

New member
Feb 6, 2008
4,048
0
0
Trace2010 said:
Lukeje said:
Trace2010 said:
Consider:

B) One huge argument is that "the DNA of man and the DNA of chimps/gorillas only differ by 2% so it is assumed that they have a common ancestor." To that I respond, "ask any astrophysicist what a 2% variation in the angle a rocket is fired will do when you are trying to get to the outer planets". You'll hit the moon, and maybe you'll hit Mars, but you are going to miss the outer planets completely.
You seem to be missing the point that we know where the 2% variation lies, and that it is perfectly plausible for the mutations to have arisen over the timescales given in the way that they did.
And I don't see what the analogy is supposed to represent? That '2% can be a lot'? A 2% change in DNA is exactly what it is, a 2% change.
Considering the intellectual ability and processing capacity of people, chimps, and gorillas, I'd say two percent is quite a lot...don't you?

They actually taught a chimp one time to play all 12 major scales on a xylophone. He can't do that rather well- just don't ask him to sight read or play in a symphony any time soon.
You seemed to be implying that the 2% variation meant that we couldn't have evolved. The fact that such a small change can cause such a big difference is in fact evidence for evolution.
 

Trace2010

New member
Aug 10, 2008
1,019
0
0
Dechef said:
Trace2010 said:
If God is scientifically proven, then people don't need faith.
If People don't have faith, they cannot be saved.
ENDGAME.
I have faith in my own ability to make the decisions that are right for me.
There's your faith.
FABULOUS!!! Thanks for playing! Good night, and Good Luck!
 

Trace2010

New member
Aug 10, 2008
1,019
0
0
They actually taught a chimp one time to play all 12 major scales on a xylophone. He can't do that rather well- just don't ask him to sight read or play in a symphony any time soon.[/quote] You seemed to be implying that the 2% variation meant that we couldn't have evolved. The fact that such a small change can cause such a big difference is in fact evidence for evolution.[/quote]

I am not saying mankind hasn't evolved- of course we have. What do you think skin pigmentation is- or round and slanted eyes are (evolutions of man to protect against THE SUN)? But I AM saying we didn't start with the rest of the universe- WE WERE PLACED within it at a particular place and time where the planet could best facilitate human growth and development. And the fact that we were placed in the proper place, in the proper time, with THE ABILITY TO EVOLVE only furthers my point. Scientists still have struggled over THE MISSING LINK, and the so called GREAT LEAP FORWARD. Why? CAUSE IT'S NOT THERE!!
 

Trace2010

New member
Aug 10, 2008
1,019
0
0
TheBadass said:
Trace2010 said:
If that's what you believe, fine.
Just don't tell me it's a fact.

We're not talking about quantifiable fact here. God exists outside of the boundaries of human logic and reasoning.

j-e-f-f-e-r-s said:
I have a question: How can God be so arrogant as to stake his religion on nothing more than faith, yet be willing to damn for eternity all those who do not follow the 'one true path' of christianity? If you're going to damn to hell all those who don't believe in Jesus, isn't it up to you to give people the best damn evidence possible that you exist and he was the 'Son of God'?
First of all, as a Christian I am more concerned about myself. No, I am not damming anybody; I can't measure the inside of anyone's heart and mind, only God can- and I trust He will be a better judge.

Second of all: NO- if God comes out and proves He exists, that takes away the ability for mankind to need faith, thus completely erasing all of the work done trying to save His people.

If God is scientifically proven, then people don't need faith.
If People don't have faith, they cannot be saved.
ENDGAME.
Why is faith needed for people to be saved again? Seems a bit unfair, considering that some people around the world are taught from a young age to dissaprove of the concept, thereby becoming automatically damned for all eternity.
I hope not, but you could be right.

Let me answer your first question, though...
Christians believe that there is an extra player in the game. He was formerly known as Lucifer...chose to rebel against God, was banished from heaven and became Satan. He continuously works against the plans of God for Man through subversion, perversion, and temptation. He wants as many souls turned away from God as possible, and argues from the point of reason--"If I couldn't obey your laws and I got banished, how is it fair that these humans You created can get into heaven without obeying the rules. Are you not a fair and just GOD?"

The end of the Old Testament is mankind struggling with the impossibility of living up to the laws of God. Jesus starts the New Testament- God in human form (with all of its frailties and imperfections) to live the life, prove it can be done by a human, and sacrifice himself to redeem all those who invoke him as their intercessor.
 

goodman528

New member
Jul 30, 2008
763
0
0
maximilian said:
Okay, [....] feel free to ask me anything about the Christian faith [.....]
I have a few groups of questions:

1) Which parts of the Bible do you believe in? (New + Old? OR only New testament?)

Do you choose which parts of each book to believe in, or every verse in the book?

Do you believe in the literal meanings of the passages? OR can you interpret the passages? OR the Preacher / church's interpretation of the passages?

2) Do you believe in Heaven and Hell?

How can God be omniscient if I have free will? (Either A) he knows what I'm going to do, OR B) I can choose what I'm going to do, so he doesn't know. You can't have both.)

If I have free will, AND God is benevolent and merciful, then how can I end up in Hell for an eternity? (Because surely after I go to Hell, I would choose to repent and be saved.)

Christmas is near, but did Christ die for everybody, or just for the Christians? (If Jesus died for me as well as you, then surely my original sin is already forgiven, then I'll be saved no matter what.)

What about people who do not have the choice of believing in Christ? (like people in BC times)

What about people who would find their life a lot more difficult if they became Christians? (like in North Korea, wouldn't that be indirect suicide?)

3) Should christians actively try to change the world? (charity? media? politics? foreign policy? cult vigilante? where should the line be drawn?)

It seems many people see "War on Terror" as supporting Christian values against Islamic terrorists who are attacking it. Is this a new crusade with oil replacing gold?

Would Christians then be the tyranny of the minority? (like the communists in Russia were, because they were also driven by their belief)

4) Evolution is creationism, right? Seriously, because explaining the sudden appearance of DNA and proteins is dodgey business. Though it doesn't clash with God initially creating life, it would clash if you believe God created all life through all time. How would you explain natural selection? (Are gene mutations random or pre-determined by God? Why create a spieces that's going to die anyway?) BTW, I've only ever heard of one version of evolution theory: Random mutuation + Natural selection. I wasn't aware there are any different versions. But I am surprised by the number of Christian Biologists I've met.

What's your view on all this teaching Creationism in schools thing?

If the SETI program finds inteligent aliens, can they also become Christians? (A]They are not descendents of Adam and Eve, so no original sin. OR B]did Christ die for everything in the universe?)

5) What are your favourite computer games?
 

Anarchemitis

New member
Dec 23, 2007
9,102
0
0
PatientGrasshopper said:
Anarchemitis said:
There is no fate or predestination. God set up the world so everything by his plan would automatically fall into place for his own desires.
It's like he set up a gigantic room of dominoes, and his objective is to have a domino fall down on the opposite side of the room. As soon as he flicks one, it doesn't matter what course history will take, all will result in the praise and glory of the Lord.
God knows how everything will happen but he allows us to make choices, I mean since God is good he could not make us do bad therefore we have free will at least were sinning is involved, however only he can grant us salvation.
Allows us choices, therefore the analogy of a room full of dominoes as opposed to a straight line, single file.
Also the domino analogy makes noted that God doesn't need to knock down each and every single one, they fall into place naturally.
 

sneakypenguin

Elite Member
Legacy
Jul 31, 2008
2,804
0
41
Country
usa
I have come to point out my views against predestination bear with it
Starting of with a view of God's sovereignty.

As I consider the interaction of God?s sovereignty and man?s free will, I see three possible positions.

1. God sovereignly dictates every nuance of every thought, word or action of every man, rendering man as nothing more than a dangling marionette in the hands of a divine puppetmaster.

2. Man is a completely autonomous being who is free to do as he chooses without divine influence or consequence.

Most of us would agree that these are two extreme positions that have no basis in scripture. The first is so fatalistic as to remove any semblance of hope or worship. The second is little more than atheism.

Surely the truth must lie in a balance between the two. There is never a moment, circumstance or action in the course of man?s history in which God has not, is not or will not be sovereignly involved. The question is, ?What degree of control does God exercise??

I believe that God and God alone can answer that question.

Some have suggested that the idea of man having a free will is somehow a denial of the sovereignty of God. If it is God who created man with a free will, omnisciently knowing how man will exercise it, omnipresently influencing man to use it for God?s glory and omnipotently holding man responsible for how he exercises the free will, how is His sovereignty denied?

Some have stated that because God is sovereign, He must be in absolute control of every circumstance. To think otherwise, some say, is to leave the door open for open theism. As long as we don?t forget the omniscience and foreknowledge of God, we will never be in danger of straying into that pit of heresy.

End discussion of God?s sovereignty

Why I disagree with Calvinistic predestination
(some of this may be argumentative sounding but it?s not meant to be)
here are five main points to calvinism spelled out by the TULIP acronymn:

? Total Depravity/Inability
o This is saying that man is hopelessly sinful. Man is incapable of being "good." Any "good" deed is truly motivated by something evil. The rest of the four points rely on this point.

? Unconditional Election
o Since man is totally evil, man's salvation is completely dependent upon God. This part is somewhat biblical; God chooses who he chooses. No matter how hard man tries, his actions alone cannot get him into heaven; God is the only one who has control. However, I believe that God will save those who have faith in Him, thus granting some influence to man. Afterall, God is just. However, calvinists see it otherwise. Calvinists believe that man has no free spiritual will.

? Limited Atonement
o Since God predestined the elect, Jesus paid only for those few elect.

? Irresistible Grace
o The elect have no choice about being elect. The elect cannot resist God's grace.

? Perseverence of the Saints
o The calvinists believe that once you're saved, you're always saved since God had predestined the elect and the elect have no choice about being elect.
The last four points rely so strongly on the first point. Is man purely evil and incapable of good deeds whose intentions were not born of evil origins? Many non-calvinists typically grant this first point, for it seems biblical and logical. Unfortunately, if we grant the first point, then the other four points can easily be proven as true, thus acknowledging that calvinism is in fact true. But I contend that man is not purely evil. For if man was indeed purely evil, it is easily seen that man cannot possibly obey God's command to repent. God threatens to eternally punish those who do not repent. But if man is purely evil and thus cannot repent, then God is not just.

Rather, man can indeed repent. Even Moses declared to his hearers that what he is commanding them to do is not too difficult or beyond their reach.. Moses simply commanded them to love God, to walk in his ways and his commands, decrees, and laws. Yet, if man is totally incapable of any non-evil-motivated action, then, well, you see the problem

? if God predestined everything, then there is no use in praying for your friends or family.
? Basically, God has already predestined the events and no appealing to God will likely change his mind- it has already been predestined and cannot be changed.
? The idea of predestining everything, could it not be disproven by Moses appealing to God not to destroy them(this is the first example to pop into my head)
32:9 And the LORD said unto Moses, I have seen this people, and, behold, it [is] a stiffnecked people:
32:10 Now therefore let me alone, that my wrath may wax hot against them, and that I may consume them: and I will make of thee a great nation.
32:11 And Moses besought the LORD his God, and said, LORD, why doth thy wrath wax hot against thy people, which thou hast brought forth out of the land of Egypt with great power, and with a mighty hand?
32:12 Wherefore should the Egyptians speak, and say, For mischief did he bring them out, to slay them in the mountains, and to consume them from the face of the earth? Turn from thy fierce wrath, and repent of this evil against thy people.
32:13 Remember Abraham, Isaac, and Israel, thy servants, to whom thou swarest by thine own self, and saidst unto them, I will multiply your seed as the stars of heaven, and all this land that I have spoken of will I give unto your seed, and they shall inherit [it] for ever.
32:14 And the LORD repented of the evil which he thought to do unto his people.
?

? If God predestined everything, then God created sin.
? This is where Calvinists disagree among themselves. There are several camps; some that believe every little detail has been predestined, those who believe that God predestined all major events (including salvation), and those who believe that God only predestines those who will be saved. I suppose this point would address the first camp; If indeed God did predestined every little thing, then God did create sin. He caused man to act a specific way knowing in advance what it would lead to.

? If man is totally incapable of good, then man cannot truly be remorseful or repentant.

? If man is totally incapable of good, then man cannot be faulted for his sins.

? If God predestined everything, then there is no such thing as randomness. (Now that's an interesting research topic..)

? If God predestined everything, then why eternally condemn the non-elect? After all, it is not their fault.. they were predestined to be damned!

? This concept is called double-predestination. The logic is rather simple: if God only allows the elect to be saved, and God predestined the elect, then by default, God predestined everyone else who is not elect to be eternally condemned.
? Most Calvinists believe it, but there are quite a few who don't. Thomas Aquinas' view was that God does not in fact damn those whose inherent sin would normally be condemning; God simply "passes over" those who he chose to not predestine. While this view is also somewhat arrogant, (how arrogant it is for us to believe we were predestined while our neighbor might not be), it simply doesn't make sense. The bible clearly states otherwise.
? (never mind that little verse that says "whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life")

The existence of God has been manifested in every person in their unregenerate (unsaved) state by the attributes of God clearly seen in all of His creation so that no one is without excuse for rejecting God. This scripture is in complete contradiction to the erroneous doctrine of being blind and deaf to the things of God in Total Depravity(the first tenet of predestination)

The Bible affirms man's ability to respond to the Gospel while in a fallen state since the fall of Adam. Although the natural man is a sinner, the following verses are in clear contradiction to the erroneous theologies of Total Depravity or Total Inability which teach that the unregenerate man does not have the ability to believe in the redemptive work of Jesus Christ for his salvation. The Bible solidly teaches that every person is given a measure of faith and has been enlightened by Jesus Christ while still in his unsaved, fallen state.

1:9 If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.

Romans 10:9-10 (King James Version)
9That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved.
10For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation.

Romans 10:13
"for Whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved."

John 3:16
"For God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in Him shall not perish, but have eternal life.

These are just romans road verses not to mention others thoughout the gospel

Total Inability and the Gospel
The Total Inability passed to us makes it impossible for us to comply with the command to believe in Christ. The most obvious fault with this doctrine is that it makes the gospel an unreasonable demand. How can God, who is perfectly just, "command all men everywhere to repent" (Acts 17:30), knowing the command is impossible to obey?
This is a vexing problem for Calvinists. They will often assert that a command does not necessarily imply the ability to keep it. But the statement is certainly not self-evident. If God gives a command and threatens to punish as responsible agents those who do not comply, it certainly does imply the ability to obey. Orville Dewey writes: "...it would follow that men are commanded, on peril and pain of all future woes, to love a holiness and a moral perfection of God, which they are not merely unable to love, but of which, according to the supposition, they have no conception."9

That puts the Calvinist in a conundrum. Man is so corrupt, he will not and cannot obey even the slightest spiritual command - nor can he appreciate or even understand it. Yet, God orders him to believe; He punishes him for not believing. As Judge of the Universe, he justly condemns the sinner for not doing what he from birth cannot do. This seems to many of us to be at odds with God's revealed character.

The Old Testament demands never seemed to be presented as impossibilities for the hearers. Moses said, " For this commandment which I command thee this day, it [is] not hidden from thee, neither [is] it far off" (Deut. 30:11). What of Total Inability here? Are we to assume that all of the hearers had received the miracle of Efficacious Grace? Moses adds, "See, I set before you today life and prosperity, death and destruction. For I command you today to love the Lord your God, to walk in his ways and the commands, decrees and laws..." (v.19).

Moses sets life and death before the Israelites for their consideration. There is no intimation there that he was speaking to people utterly incapable of complying with the commands. He presents the prospects of life and death as genuine options for them to ponder.
Joshua urged the Israelites, " choose you this day whom ye will serve; whether the gods which your fathers served that were on the other side of the flood, or the gods of the Amorites, in whose land ye dwell: but as for me and my house, we will serve the LORD." (Josh. 24:15). There is nothing in Joshua's entreaty that suggests the Israelites were all unable to choose the Lord unless they first experienced an inward miracle.

Joshua did say that the people were "not able to serve the Lord" in their present sinful state (v.19). Repentance was in order. They were called upon to make a choice of the heart and turn from their evil ways. Joshua said, " Now therefore put away, said he, the strange gods which are among you, and incline your heart unto the LORD God of Israel." (v.23). Nowhere are we left with the impression that these people were all in a state of Total Inability from birth, innately incapable of yielding as Joshua commanded. Such an idea must be read into the text.


Anyways enough of my musings on the issue of predestination

My beliefs can be summed up in a few sentences
Man does indeed have a free will(and this in no way infringes on Gods sovereignty) to choose whether to serve God or reject him. As stated in the countless scriptures above. People tend to think that Gods all knowingness is in a way predestination, which is not the case. While God does know if you will be saved He does not predestine you do be saved. It brings much more honor and glory to God when one chooses to follow Him, rather than the arranged marriage of predestination.
 

Lukeje

New member
Feb 6, 2008
4,048
0
0
Trace2010 said:
I am not saying mankind hasn't evolved- of course we have. What do you think skin pigmentation is- or round and slanted eyes are (evolutions of man to protect against THE SUN)? But I AM saying we didn't start with the rest of the universe- WE WERE PLACED within it at a particular place and time where the planet could best facilitate human growth and development. And the fact that we were placed in the proper place, in the proper time, with THE ABILITY TO EVOLVE only furthers my point. Scientists still have struggled over THE MISSING LINK, and the so called GREAT LEAP FORWARD. Why? CAUSE IT'S NOT THERE!!
Lack of evidence doesn't prove either side. I haven't heard of any scientist that's 'Struggled over the missing link', we've found plenty of 'missing links' yet strangely, yet despite overwhelming evidence, people still believe that the only way we could have been created is by God putting us here. Do you at least accept that evolution is a plausible explanation?
 

Sgt. Pepper

New member
Aug 17, 2008
66
0
0
I don't mean the KKK, I mean the sect of Christianity that has a cross and a fire on the bottom. I asked someone else, it's the Methodists. http://www.cumcwaco.com/clientimages/39975/methodist_logo.gif
 

jordan.

New member
Nov 9, 2008
17
0
0
PatientGrasshopper said:
jordan. said:
G_Wright said:
jordan. said:
And regarding predestination; it is impossible to argue AGAINST predestination from the Bible.
And also it is entirely impossible to argue against predestination from the PREMISE that God is Sovereign.
God can make what he wants to happen , happen

& he can use & shape the person he chooses to accomplish his will

humans are not predestined

you are not born to fail - or succeed

God has the right to lay tests on individuals - conversly we human beings dont have the right to put God to the test

humans dont know their position in their creators eyes , intelligence & rationality dont lead people to the correct understanding of what kind of position humanity is in

God had the bible written so we could know
Half of what you said was insightful - the other half proved my point.
You cannot refute predestination from a Biblical perspective.

Proverbs 16:4
"The LORD works out everything for his own ends?
even the wicked for a day of disaster"

Proverbs 16:9
"In his heart a man plans his course,
but the LORD determines his steps."
Ok if predestination works the way I think you are trying to say it works then what is the point of evangelism? Those who are saved are saved those who aren't, aren't and there is nothing you can do to change that, at least according to what the Calvinist belief of predestination.
The Bible says evangelism is for the most part, how predestined and "elect" people come to faith.

Acts 13:48
"When the Gentiles heard this, they were glad and honored the word of the Lord; and all who were appointed for eternal life believed."
 

CTU_Agent24

New member
May 21, 2008
529
0
0
maximilian said:
Okay, thought I'd retry this thread now that the other one has died.

Basically, feel free to ask me anything about the Christian faith - how it works, why we believe what we believe, technicalities of faith etc. Essentially, I'll explain to you from a Christian perspective. This is an attempt at an intelligent conversation between a Christian and a non-Christian to clear up different issues.

What I am not here for is to be abused or argued with, because I am presenting my faith - take it or leave it. If you don't have the respect and courtesy to be civil then I won't reply to your question. That said, the more challenging or surprising the question, the more of a pleasure this will be. Also, I won't take kindly to baiting questions eg. "why do you believe stupid stuff/why are you an idiot/why don't Christians stone homosexuals etc"

If you ask a question, then understand that what I have given you is what I believe and the Christian perspective. You may disagree, but the point of this thread isn't to argue over the validity of my faith, but to actually find out what Christians believe.

Similarly, please don't make this another prop 8/gay marriage related thread; we have numerous running at this time.

Essentially, you respect me and I respect you!

Lastly, my background:

I have a great interest in my faith and the theology of it to a point where I received a degree in it from a respected university.
I spend most of my time between Australia and England.
I am a reformed, evangelical, conservative Christian. (aka bible based)
I became a Christian at the age of 17, having been raised in a moralistic environment.
My passions are psychology, writing, literature, fashion modeling, aesthetic, industrial design, video games, art, fitness/health and my girlfriend.
Is Masturbation wrong?
 

jordan.

New member
Nov 9, 2008
17
0
0
Sneaky Penguin, you totally don't understand predestination - I encourage you to read passages in the Bible that talk about it.

Romans 9:
"What then shall we say? Is God unjust? Not at all! For he says to Moses,
"I will have mercy on whom I have mercy,
and I will have compassion on whom I have compassion." It does not, therefore, depend on man's desire or effort, but on God's mercy. For the Scripture says to Pharaoh: "I raised you up for this very purpose, that I might display my power in you and that my name might be proclaimed in all the earth." Therefore God has mercy on whom he wants to have mercy, and he hardens whom he wants to harden.

One of you will say to me: "Then why does God still blame us? For who resists his will? But who are you, O man, to talk back to God? "Shall what is formed say to him who formed it, 'Why did you make me like this?' "Does not the potter have the right to make out of the same lump of clay some pottery for noble purposes and some for common use?

What if God, choosing to show his wrath and make his power known, bore with great patience the objects of his wrath?prepared for destruction? What if he did this to make the riches of his glory known to the objects of his mercy, whom he prepared in advance for glory"

And free will is not required for an object to obey a command. I can tell my microwave to heat up my burito, and it will - does the microwave suddenly now have free will?
 

sneakypenguin

Elite Member
Legacy
Jul 31, 2008
2,804
0
41
Country
usa
jordan. said:
Sneaky Penguin, you totally don't understand predestination - I encourage you to read passages in the Bible that talk about it.

Romans 9:
"What then shall we say? Is God unjust? Not at all! For he says to Moses,
"I will have mercy on whom I have mercy,
and I will have compassion on whom I have compassion." It does not, therefore, depend on man's desire or effort, but on God's mercy. For the Scripture says to Pharaoh: "I raised you up for this very purpose, that I might display my power in you and that my name might be proclaimed in all the earth." Therefore God has mercy on whom he wants to have mercy, and he hardens whom he wants to harden.

One of you will say to me: "Then why does God still blame us? For who resists his will? But who are you, O man, to talk back to God? "Shall what is formed say to him who formed it, 'Why did you make me like this?' "Does not the potter have the right to make out of the same lump of clay some pottery for noble purposes and some for common use?

What if God, choosing to show his wrath and make his power known, bore with great patience the objects of his wrath?prepared for destruction? What if he did this to make the riches of his glory known to the objects of his mercy, whom he prepared in advance for glory"

And free will is not required for an object to obey a command. I can tell my microwave to heat up my burito, and it will - does the microwave suddenly now have free will?
I shall respond to you further tomorrow morning as I have night school then some homework. And my limited time would not due justice to the debate
But just a question, how would a Calvinists get passed all the scripture that says whosoever will shall be saved, the Lord wanting all to come to repentance etc?

Is it not God's foreknowledge not pre deciding. IE God knew Pharaoh would be like he was, so God used that to promote His will not God made Pharaoh to be like that.
I shall propose a better opposition later, just thought i'd throw this out.