Ask a Voraphile (possibly disturbing)

[Ironic Pirate]

what is it that you find so (not sure if i can call sexy) about being eaten?

I'm on the eating end of the spectrum, myself, so I can't say. On a certain level, it's sort of like a whole body blow-job, and a lot of preys find it enjoyable to be totally submissive, sort of a domination thing.

I would like to ask:

Would even you watch the Human centipede?

Nah. There is a correlation between vore and scat, but not for me. Poop is poop, and poop gross.

How and when did you discover this fetish?

Through a cracked article about weird fetishes, actually. It was about a form of vore I don't like, though, but when I researched it more I guess I just found it appealing. I'd always liked fairy tales with this sort of thing as far as I can remember, though.

Sorry to bring specifics into it. But what is it you specifically fantasise about?

Cutting someone up with a knife and fork and swallowing them, or tearing chunks off them with your teeth and swallowing the flesh, or something else?

Are they alive/conscious when you do this?

Does it matter if they're male or female?

I suppose I should have clarified in the OP. There's hard vore and soft vore, with hardvore being more "realistic" with blood and tearing and such. I'm a soft vore guy, which is whole and alive. To me, it doesn't matter the genders involved because vore isn't equivalent to sex, despite being sexual. This isn't the standard however, most people like the same gender pairings the like in sex.

How was lunch?

btw. Your avatar makes an eerie kind of sense now.

Disgusting. Salami doesn't keep as long as I thought it did, and they only other thing in the house was twizzlers.

 

[Sizzle Montyjing]

Right...
I had no idea this even exsisted.

The only fetishes i really knew of were that of feet and animals.
Colour me educated!

Okay, and now for my question...
How in the world did you discover this fetsih?
AND WHEN DID YOU RESEARCH IT!?
...
That will be all.

EDIT: I see my question has been answered, in that case i shall ask you in how you satisy this fetish.

As long as it's not too explicit.

 

[Dumbfish1]

I know some people like vore because, as strange as it sounds, it's safe. They just live inside someone's body, not having to worry about anything. That's called endo, and I'm afraid I don't know much about it.

Ahhh. You're showing a basic misunderstanding of how fatal being eaten is.

 

[The Lunatic]

Do you ever find yourself looking back at various things you saw as a kid and find them oddly related?

 

[Dejanus]

That's certainly an interesting fetish, mine are much more pedestrian, I'm afraid.

Asians, English Accents, and Rape. Really only serves to ensure that I have no grounds to attack anyone else's proclivities, I suppose.

Edit: Oh, do you have numbers on your fetish as compared to others? Mine are fairly common, I had not even heard of yours.

 

[Chicago Ted]

Why do you feel that your fetish is distinct enough to make you appear as though you have professional or meaningful insight on a matter?

I'm sorry, but these threads really do need to stop. Perhaps those that are in regards to a career, or some form of real distinction (ie, cop for career, disability (something like paraplegic I mean) for distinction), do hold some real insight and information in regards to how it differentiates their life from mine, but what exactly is it about this topic in particular that makes you different enough from a normal person to warrant a thread devoted to this topic?

To me, the purpose of this thread serves to only to try and draw attention to oneself through minimal distinction (though, this entire genre, the Ask a _______, are notorious in my mind for that). You do not need to showcase the inner workings of yourself and to justify and explain why you are like this. Ones that show case personal views are the worst for this as they are perhaps the least distinctive of all, and the things that get you off are included under that umbrella.

Edit: Oh, and don't take this for discrimination or anything such as that. Take this as a rant against this style of thread, and the fact that they are holding less and less actual value the more I see them, especially when they are in the case of individual beliefs and ideals, and not about things that are far different that what I would experience in everyday life.

 

[Actual]

...questions...

I suppose I should have clarified in the OP. There's hard vore and soft vore, with hardvore being more "realistic" with blood and tearing and such. I'm a soft vore guy, which is whole and alive. To me, it doesn't matter the genders involved because vore isn't equivalent to sex, despite being sexual. This isn't the standard however, most people like the same gender pairings the like in sex.

Very interesting, thank you.

So rather than something brutal, I'm now imagining your fantasy like being held in a tight hug by a giant fat woman.

 

[Dejanus]

Asians, English Accents, and Rape. Really only serves to ensure that I have no grounds to attack anyone else's proclivities, I suppose.

A pity, two hundred years ago you'd have fit in splendidly in the Opium trade.

... I'm trying not to be amused by that.

 

[Macgyvercas]

You don't actually eat people though, am I correct? So how does this "digestion" thing work? Is it like a really really REALLY insanely detailed form of roleplaying or something?

 

[Kpt._Rob]

Needless to say, analysis of such things from a Freudian perspective is always controversial and never all that conclusive. That said, it seems to me that one could draw on the metaphor of the act of swallowing as having some similarity to sex, the throat serving as a vagina, and the entity being consumed serving as the phallic entity. Only here the act is fully embodied, at least for the male entity.

To hypothesize even further, one could say that might account for why so called "preds" are not generally male, most males don't have vaginal fantasies. This might explain the fantasy for the "prey," to literally become a penis in the act of coitus, strange as it might sound, would probably feel overwhelmingly good.

As for the "pred," it does seem an inverse on the typical female role. To put it in the tastelessly blunt wording of Freudian analysis, here the act of "swallowing" becomes an act of empowerment. While there are many exceptions, and they are becoming more common in our society as patriarchal society has begun to decline, the historical role of the female in society has been submissive. But embodied in the fantasy of the "pred" is a reversal of these power roles. The act of coitus becomes one of dominance in which they, quite literally, devour their prey.

What would you say, OP, in response to a Freudian analysis of this nature?

 

[Flamezdudes]

For some reason this thread brought to mind when Cell in Dragon Ball Z swallowed people alive with his tail. OP, have you ever seen that and if so how did it actually make you feel?

It may be a little specific but do you... give yourself sexual pleasure (if you know what i mean) when imagining these fantasies then?

 

[Ironic Pirate]

This is very interesting to me, it opens up a totally new door of human behavior I hadn't thought of before. So cool to see how the human mind can symbolically sexualize or emotionally reconfigure its body's non-sexual functions. I'd be very interested to get a more intimate look if you're willing to share more.

Edit: Actually, gonna just think up some relevant questions, stay tuned...

Go ahead, fire away. If it's really indepth, you can send a Pm if you want.

Does eating ginger-bread men give you a boner?

Nah, because I can't swallow them whole. I tried, almost chocked to death. Embarassing, it was.

Not going to lie, I have often felt certain twinges below the equator when I eat a really good bacon sandwich, but eating a person for sexual arousal?
And you'd of thought that there wouldn't be many 'prey' people, seeing as they could only really do it once....


Er... I guess, have you ever eaten a person?

You mean in role-play or something? And plenty of prey like regurgitation or reformation

You do realize that by consuming the entire person unprepared you would be consuming their blood and every disease and infection that your body has never had direct or that powerful a contact with...

Anyone who actually did this if they didn't die shortly after would have the most painful life in existence, cannibals usually prepare their food and those that don't... do actually die.

Yeah, and even if you lived you'd become incredibly fat. I know it's not possible, which is a good thing for everyone.

What do you do exactly ? to accomplish your fetish ?

Role-play, read or write stories. There's a fair amount of drawings out there as well. I'm probably not allowed to link, but you can search DA for some sample pictures.

So, I ask, you Mr. Vorephile:

How's your day been going so far? I hope its been doing well.

Good, thanks for asking. I captured some towns in Mount and Blade, and watched a couple awesomely shitty movies from my DVD collection.

Nobody respects those movies for the genius they are. We all know that feel, bro.

I know. Uwe Boll is totally the next Scorsese.

I've never heard of Voraphiles before and I was quite disturbed until you said that it's all fantasy. But now I'm confused because I don't really know how it works. Do you just think about eating someone, do you do some sort of cosplay where you pretend to eat someone else who's a prey?

I could think about it, or do role-play, or read a story or look at drawings. That sort of cosplay is possible, but I've never done it.

/forever alone.

Well if you are offering questions;
1. What is the view on size? As in miniaturised prey or full-sized prey? Both for yourself and the Vore community.
2. Do many Voraphiliacs do vore-esque things with their partners, such as putting hands-in-mouths (or other areas), or does the impossibility of bieng swallowed whole and alive make people keep IRL sex, and Fantasy sex seperate? (Or at least, in Cyber form)
3. Do you see Voraphiliacs deviate between liking "Swallowed Hole" and "Swallowed realistically" (i.e. carved up but alive).

1). Depends. I like full-size prey usually, but they can be somewhat smaller. Other people like all kinds of crazy differences, I believe planet eating came up once. The most common are same size and prey that are only a few inches tall.

2) Depends on the partner. I remember one guy said his girl friend would wear a big shirt, and he'd crawl in it and pretend she ate him. Obviously, it's hard to tell if people are making that up or not.

3) I really should have added that to the OP... Anyway, yeah. Some people like "soft" vore (swallowed whole) others like hard (the opposite)

When looking for a partner, is it important to you that they are the corresponding prey to your pred? I guess what I'm asking is, how big a part of your sex life is vore? Can you do okay without it, if your partner is thoroughly uninterested?

I don't have a sex life /forever alone.

More seriously, not really. In online rp, it doesn't matter who else is eating them, because within the reality of the Rp that's not happening. And for me, vore isn't really linked to sex, although if I had a partner who was willing I'd do some sort of role play.

So what prompted you to make this thread specifically?

Also, doesn't it get frustrating having a fetish you can't indulge?

Nothing really, just realized the wikipedia page was unhelpful and no one else had done one.

Also, not really. I have other indulgable (?) fetishes, and actually indulging in vore would be horrible. Besides, there's plenty of stories and such.

 

[Charisma]

Why do you feel that your fetish is distinct enough to make you appear as though you have professional or meaningful insight on a matter?

I'm sorry, but these threads really do need to stop. Perhaps those that are in regards to a career, or some form of real distinction (ie, cop for career, disability (something like paraplegic I mean) for distinction), do hold some real insight and information in regards to how it differentiates their life from mine, but what exactly is it about this topic in particular that makes you different enough from a normal person to warrant a thread devoted to this topic?

To me, the purpose of this thread serves to only to try and draw attention to oneself through minimal distinction (though, this entire genre, the Ask a _______, are notorious in my mind for that). You do not need to showcase the inner workings of yourself and to justify and explain why you are like this. Ones that show case personal views are the worst for this as they are perhaps the least distinctive of all, and the things that get you off are included under that umbrella.

You know, between your post and your avatar (Mr. T punching a pony - shamelessly and pointlessly abrasive) you seem pretty ignorant and shallow. But ignorance isn't even the worst problem; you're projecting your own flaws on the OP in the fact that you belittle the attention-grabbing aspect of his thread. True, part of why he's doing this is for attention, but it's also an interesting subject to many of us. To me you seem like more of an attn whore than the OP; the difference is he's successful at it and you're jealous. And for the record, he didn't come off as an attn whore to me, at all.

 

[blipblop]

wait what you acctualy eat people???

 

[kebab4you]

And I thought people looked at me weird whenever I admit to having a huge love for lolis ._. So tell me mr, how did you find it out, what was your first experience with voraphile?

 

[Charisma]

Needless to say, analysis of such things from a Freudian perspective is always controversial and never all that conclusive. That said, it seems to me that one could draw on the metaphor of the act of swallowing as having some similarity to sex, the throat serving as a vagina, and the entity being consumed serving as the phallic entity. Only here the act is fully embodied, at least for the male entity.

To hypothesize even further, one could say that might account for why so called "preds" are not generally male, most males don't have vaginal fantasies. This might explain the fantasy for the "prey," to literally become a penis in the act of coitus, strange as it might sound, would probably feel overwhelmingly good.

As for the "pred," it does seem an inverse on the typical female role. To put it in the tastelessly blunt wording of Freudian analysis, here the act of "swallowing" becomes an act of empowerment. While there are many exceptions, and they are becoming more common in our society as patriarchal society has begun to decline, the historical role of the female in society has been submissive. But embodied in the fantasy of the "pred" is a reversal of these power roles. The act of coitus becomes one of dominance in which they, quite literally, devour their prey.

What would you say, OP, in response to a Freudian analysis of this nature?

That is VERY interesting! So when transferring the sex act to digestion, the female/vaginal role becomes the dominant one and the male/phallic becomes submissive.

I'd love to see the OP's take on this, and where he, as a male pred, falls.

 

[jakko12345]

Do you consider your fetish disgusting, or do you think about how other people view it?

 

[Ironic Pirate]

Right...
I had no idea this even exsisted.

The only fetishes i really knew of were that of feet and animals.
Colour me educated!

Okay, and now for my question...
How in the world did you discover this fetsih?
AND WHEN DID YOU RESEARCH IT!?
...
That will be all.

EDIT: I see my question has been answered, in that case i shall ask you in how you satisy this fetish.

As long as it's not too explicit.

Through role-play, stories, pictures, etc.

I know some people like vore because, as strange as it sounds, it's safe. They just live inside someone's body, not having to worry about anything. That's called endo, and I'm afraid I don't know much about it.

Ahhh. You're showing a basic misunderstanding of how fatal being eaten is.

It's also completely fantasy, which means that anything goes.

Do you ever find yourself looking back at various things you saw as a kid and find them oddly related?

Yeah. Especially fairy tales.

That's certainly an interesting fetish, mine are much more pedestrian, I'm afraid.

Asians, English Accents, and Rape. Really only serves to ensure that I have no grounds to attack anyone else's proclivities, I suppose.

Edit: Oh, do you have numbers on your fetish as compared to others? Mine are fairly common, I had not even heard of yours.

There seems to be a lot on deviant-art, and another site I visit has quite a few members. As for actual numbers, I have no idea, sorry.

Why do you feel that your fetish is distinct enough to make you appear as though you have professional or meaningful insight on a matter?

I'm sorry, but these threads really do need to stop. Perhaps those that are in regards to a career, or some form of real distinction (ie, cop for career, disability (something like paraplegic I mean) for distinction), do hold some real insight and information in regards to how it differentiates their life from mine, but what exactly is it about this topic in particular that makes you different enough from a normal person to warrant a thread devoted to this topic?

To me, the purpose of this thread serves to only to try and draw attention to oneself through minimal distinction (though, this entire genre, the Ask a _______, are notorious in my mind for that). You do not need to showcase the inner workings of yourself and to justify and explain why you are like this. Ones that show case personal views are the worst for this as they are perhaps the least distinctive of all, and the things that get you off are included under that umbrella.

Edit: Oh, and don't take this for discrimination or anything such as that. Take this as a rant against this style of thread, and the fact that they are holding less and less actual value the more I see them, especially when they are in the case of individual beliefs and ideals, and not about things that are far different that what I would experience in everyday life.

For one thing, there isn't much in the way of "professional" insight for vore at all. The wikipedia page is pathetic, and as far as I know there haven't been any studies on it.

And from quite a few other threads, people don't know anything about it. So I thought I might as well find out if anyone has any questions. If nobody did, the thread would die and not bother anyone. If people had questions, then they could ask them, I don't see why you feel the need to complain. Obviously, there are other people who were curious enough to ask, so why do you feel the need to complain (and by doing so, bumping the thread)

...questions...

I suppose I should have clarified in the OP. There's hard vore and soft vore, with hardvore being more "realistic" with blood and tearing and such. I'm a soft vore guy, which is whole and alive. To me, it doesn't matter the genders involved because vore isn't equivalent to sex, despite being sexual. This isn't the standard however, most people like the same gender pairings the like in sex.

Very interesting, thank you.

So rather than something brutal, I'm now imagining your fantasy like being held in a tight hug by a giant fat woman.

Well, I'm more of a pred. But for some people, that's it, yeah.

You don't actually eat people though, am I correct? So how does this "digestion" thing work? Is it like a really really REALLY insanely detailed form of roleplaying or something?

It usually doesn't get all that detailed. Most people can imagine it, so in a role-play a sentence or so is enough. And there's pictures and stories as well.

Needless to say, analysis of such things from a Freudian perspective is always controversial and never all that conclusive. That said, it seems to me that one could draw on the metaphor of the act of swallowing as having some similarity to sex, the throat serving as a vagina, and the entity being consumed serving as the phallic entity. Only here the act is fully embodied, at least for the male entity.

To hypothesize even further, one could say that might account for why so called "preds" are not generally male, most males don't have vaginal fantasies. This might explain the fantasy for the "prey," to literally become a penis in the act of coitus, strange as it might sound, would probably feel overwhelmingly good.

As for the "pred," it does seem an inverse on the typical female role. To put it in the tastelessly blunt wording of Freudian analysis, here the act of "swallowing" becomes an act of empowerment. While there are many exceptions, and they are becoming more common in our society as patriarchal society has begun to decline, the historical role of the female in society has been submissive. But embodied in the fantasy of the "pred" is a reversal of these power roles. The act of coitus becomes one of dominance in which they, quite literally, devour their prey.

What would you say, OP, in response to a Freudian analysis of this nature?

Not being an expert, that certainly seems interesting if not 100% applicable. For me, vore is also about a very predator/prey dynamic as well, not necessarily related to sex. Un-birth is always interesting to analyze from that perspective, though.

For some reason this thread brought to mind when Cell in Dragon Ball Z swallowed people alive with his tail. OP, have you ever seen that and if so how did it actually make you feel?

It may be a little specific but do you... give yourself sexual pleasure (if you know what i mean) when imagining these fantasies then?

I haven't seen that scene, but tail vore is a thing, so I imagine some people have.

As for the second part, through role-play, drawings, things like that.

 

[Kpt._Rob]

Needless to say, analysis of such things from a Freudian perspective is always controversial and never all that conclusive. That said, it seems to me that one could draw on the metaphor of the act of swallowing as having some similarity to sex, the throat serving as a vagina, and the entity being consumed serving as the phallic entity. Only here the act is fully embodied, at least for the male entity.

To hypothesize even further, one could say that might account for why so called "preds" are not generally male, most males don't have vaginal fantasies. This might explain the fantasy for the "prey," to literally become a penis in the act of coitus, strange as it might sound, would probably feel overwhelmingly good.

As for the "pred," it does seem an inverse on the typical female role. To put it in the tastelessly blunt wording of Freudian analysis, here the act of "swallowing" becomes an act of empowerment. While there are many exceptions, and they are becoming more common in our society as patriarchal society has begun to decline, the historical role of the female in society has been submissive. But embodied in the fantasy of the "pred" is a reversal of these power roles. The act of coitus becomes one of dominance in which they, quite literally, devour their prey.

What would you say, OP, in response to a Freudian analysis of this nature?

That is VERY interesting! So when transferring the sex act to digestion, the female/vaginal role becomes the dominant one and the male/phallic becomes submissive.

I'd love to see the OP's take on this, and where he, as a male pred, falls.

Well, assuming that the hastily scrawled Freudian analysis of an armchair psychologist has any validity. There are a lot of qualifiers in there, and one could hardly say that my hypothesis is anything but that, a hypothesis.

Still, like you I think it'd have been interesting to see the OP's response. Not that I blame him for not having responded. One of the biggest reasons for which Freudian analysis fell out of style is because people just didn't like hearing it. It's rarely ever flattering, and if it's true, then it forces us to face things about ourselves that we don't want to admit to anyone, nonetheless to the world. In the context of my analysis, the male OP could simply have a power fantasy (they aren't at all uncommon amongst peoples of either gender, even though none of us likes to think that we get off on dominating others), or could have a combination of some gender role fantasies and power fantasies. Like I said, those aren't flattering things to think one has.

It should probably be taken as a lesson in why one doesn't spill their darkest shit on the internet... primarily because amateur psychologists like myself will come along and change the context of the conversation.