Ask a Voraphile (possibly disturbing)

Recommended Videos

Eccentric Lich

New member
Dec 8, 2009
93
0
0
dark-mortality said:
Eccentric Lich said:
dark-mortality said:
I find Vore oddly fascinating to be honest, as long as it's not TO graphical. It may also 'help' that I have a chubby fetish. I also find it a bit fascinating that there's so many people arguing that asking question. (If someone are replying just to start an argument, or because they doesn't like my opinion, then I won't answer. I am not here to quarrel.)

Anyway, I have some questions:
1) As far as you know, does the Vore community, or Vore people in general prefer a gender, or are they pretty much Bisexual?
2) Aside from Furry, is Vore linked towards some other fetishes/Fantasies?
3) This has most likely been asked/said before, but how do you visualice yourself 'swallowing' people? Is it like a snake, cracking open your jaw to a ridiculous size, are you yourself a giant, or does it just happen? And when it comes to after the swallowing, what do you do?
4) You say you are a predator, then I must ask what type of prey are your favorite? Do you also know what type of prey is the favorite of the 'general' Vore community?

Excuse my terrible English, I am not English, so it's most likely some/alot of mistakes there. Do nag at me if you find any.
Actually, your English is pretty good.

1) Most people who are into vore prefer one gender for their prey. Usually it's whatever gender they're attracted to in reality. For me, I'd only do a vore RP with a guy.
2) Vore is also linked to macro/micro (giants/small people), weight gain and fat fetishists, and for some, scat fetishes.
3) Personally, I usually just have it happen. The pred can just stretch their mouth open wide and that's that. Unrealistic, yes, but it's convenient for the sake of a fantasy.
4)My favourite type of prey would be other furries. I do prefer certain species over others, but in general, I prefer furry to human. The vore community as a whole is really varied with gender and species, but the most common that I've seen are human men and women as prey.
Thank you for the answers :) Now, one last questions that I just remembered. What do you think about the stories, the real stories, about a person actually eating another person.
For example, this case: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/2569095.stm
¨
I know it says "Cannibalism" ,but you can also think of it as Vore. Now, what do you think about cases like that? Are they generally accepted, or do cases like that give the general Vore crowd a bad name? Err... let me ask in another way. Do the general Vore person accept that, or do they think that it's disgusting to actually DO it, and that it gives the Vore community a bad name?
Most people who are into vore just see that as the act of a crazed killer. It's not something that most people who like vore (myself included) would condone because it's happening in real life. This is the kind of thing that you need to keep in the realm of fantasy.

Besides, most vore fans go for "soft vore" in which the prey is swallowed whole which is impossible for a human to do in reality.
 

Weir DeWolfe

New member
Aug 16, 2011
5
0
0
Some people asked earlier, so as a furry vore, the aspects that I personally like...

1. I go for either pred or prey, and have no gender preference in fantasy. (I'm straight IRL)

2. I'm into the endosomatophilia thing that OP mentioned earlier. Basically, the fetish of being physically inside another living being, as well as having living beings inside.

3. I like UB (unbirthing, insertion into the female parts) more than oral vore most times. Uterus beats stomach as a destination. Plus, living, squirming dildoes. Need I elaborate?

4. I often have a very clinical interest in sex. Whenever it happens, what gets me off is the thought of all the organs doing their function. Same applies to vore. Often times in the stuff I like, it's completely fictionalized and the author has no anatomical knowledge whatsoever, but that just makes the descriptions all the more fun, unique and interesting IMO.

5. Squirming inside of the pred. Watching and touching the belly of the pred immediately after, and feeling/seeing the movement. Ties in with endo.

6. I prefer the prey to have a happy ending one way or another (no, not necessarily THAT way...), but I'm okay with digestion being involved.

7. Snakes. But mostly as the prey, which is disappointingly rare.

8. Story relevance. When the story is more about the story, but still features vore heavily. Although, that's a slippery slope of uncomfortableness, because I just read a story the other day with brilliant writing and characterization, which ultimately made it oppressively tragic and horrifying to the point where it was impossible to be aroused by otherwise amazing content. Which is part of the reason I tend to prefer...

9. Willing prey. It's often justified by having magical invincibility or resurrection powers. I don't really get it when it's not, though. Then it's kinda weird.

10. Same-size prey. Just because.

dark-mortality said:
Thank you for the answers :) Now, one last questions that I just remembered. What do you think about the stories, the real stories, about a person actually eating another person.
For example, this case: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/2569095.stm
¨
I know it says "Cannibalism" ,but you can also think of it as Vore. Now, what do you think about cases like that? Are they generally accepted, or do cases like that give the general Vore crowd a bad name? Err... let me ask in another way. Do the general Vore person accept that, or do they think that it's disgusting to actually DO it, and that it gives the Vore community a bad name?
No one I know likes that. As you said, yes, they do give us a bad name. Yes, a few people get off to the idea of hard vore in fantasy, but I don't think the community likes or condones the idea of it happening IRL.

As much of a misanthrope as I might be sometimes, I hope people can care about real people just enough to not kill each other for a fetish.

Generic Gamer said:
Actually, serious question for the OP: I know a few people who live a fetish 'lifestyle' and I've always considered it extremely weird and possibly mentally damaged, do you allow your fetish to intrude on your daily life or do you restrict it to sexy time?
Not OP (he left somewhere), but really, I don't see any point in fetishes being anywhere but sexy time. I can't even imagine a way to apply vore to real everyday life.
 

Charisma

New member
Oct 28, 2008
361
0
0
Chicago Ted said:
Charisma said:
Chicago Ted said:
Why do you feel that your fetish is distinct enough to make you appear as though you have professional or meaningful insight on a matter?

I'm sorry, but these threads really do need to stop. Perhaps those that are in regards to a career, or some form of real distinction (ie, cop for career, disability (something like paraplegic I mean) for distinction), do hold some real insight and information in regards to how it differentiates their life from mine, but what exactly is it about this topic in particular that makes you different enough from a normal person to warrant a thread devoted to this topic?

To me, the purpose of this thread serves to only to try and draw attention to oneself through minimal distinction (though, this entire genre, the Ask a _______, are notorious in my mind for that). You do not need to showcase the inner workings of yourself and to justify and explain why you are like this. Ones that show case personal views are the worst for this as they are perhaps the least distinctive of all, and the things that get you off are included under that umbrella.
You know, between your post and your avatar (Mr. T punching a pony - shamelessly and pointlessly abrasive) you seem pretty ignorant and shallow. But ignorance isn't even the worst problem; you're projecting your own flaws on the OP in the fact that you belittle the attention-grabbing aspect of his thread. True, part of why he's doing this is for attention, but it's also an interesting subject to many of us. To me you seem like more of an attn whore than the OP; the difference is he's successful at it and you're jealous. And for the record, he didn't come off as an attn whore to me, at all.
First off, to go with the avatar, it's something I found funny. Mostly to do with how many ponies people now use as avatars, I found it funny to have one where the pony is being punched.

Then again, you've already shown you're the type of person to call others shallow and petty, while you judge them based on their avatars. I especially like the part as well where you try to spin it on me being shallow and jealous, when you're the one throwing mud. Way to go champ!

And if you read the edit to what I put in earlier (note, I did edit it right after posting to try to not come off sounding like an insensitive ass), I am in NO WAY holding this against the OP based on beliefs or ignorance. I am saying that this style of thread is rather annoying because of how little distinction it now holds from everyday life. How different is one person who is a vore, from one who isn't? Let's pull up some everyday pictures to show this difference.

A typical person without voraphilic interests:


Now, person who is interested in voraphile:


At least the difference between me and an astronaut would look something like this.


And I'd be able to ask things because of it.

Your illustrations are cute but you gain no credibility from them, and I maintain that your campaign against the OP has little or no basis and that you are, in fact, jealous of the OP's success in gaining attention.

You're certainly welcome to post your opinion that this subject is not interesting to you, but clearly the community does find it at the least curious, if not definitely interesting like myself and others. And I'm welcome to post my opinion that your opinion didn't need to be said.

The fact of your post's existence indicates that you have more contempt for what the OP has done than a simple passing disapproval. And the fact that you focused on the idea that the OP wanted people to look at him and be interested, indicates that the attention is the item for which you have contempt or jealousy.

Voraphilia is not the same as a favorite color or food. It may be an issue of degree, but dealing in theoretical truths is rarely useful when handling people. In other words, everyone has a favorite color, but not everyone fantasizes about eating people, and therefore some of us may be interested. Obviously you're not (or hey, maybe you actually are and that's the real source of your antagonising), but don't deceive yourself that others share your opinion.

Lastly, I wasn't judging you based on your avatar. What I saw was a purposefully inflammatory post, and then a purposefully inflammatory avatar, and my deduction was that you are a purposefully inflammatory person. Maybe that was a failure of mine to communicate my point, but I don't think so. I think you're just an internet tough guy with an inflated sense of your own importance.
 

Weir DeWolfe

New member
Aug 16, 2011
5
0
0
Is this normal for this board to have arguments and mudslinging like this? Because if not, I apologize. Vore threads almost inevitably end with incredibly vicious and heated arguments. No idea why.
 

Weir DeWolfe

New member
Aug 16, 2011
5
0
0
Monoochrom said:
That is not how common works. Something isn't common when you have to look for a explicit place to find it. That's finding a niche, not common. *facepalm*
Fetishes are niche, and you do have to look for most of them. I meant more common than you might expect for a fetish. Common is an entirely relative term. Sorry if you misunderstood the context.

Not to mention, vores tend to not announce themselves because of potential reactions like yours.

Monoochrom said:
What is supposedly harmless or a simple ''quirk'' (really?...without words) about being aroused by the idea of devouring a person or being devoured? That is not harmless. It is not a simple quirk. Locking the bathroom door when alone is a quirk. Not fantasizing about eating someone for fucks sake. At this point I'd also like to state that, you being not only a vora but also a furry, doesn't exactly make you the best judge of what is common or a quirk. Ofcourse you'll disagree, but then again, you're afflicted. Also...what exactly does locking myself in a box and being tossed into a lake have to do with being tied to the bed, being the submissive partner in bed. I'm really missing where you are coming from with that, sounds like something entirely different, sounds alot like pure stupidity...or a failed magic trick.
I may be a vore and a furry (by technical definition, I don't buy into the lifestyle crap), but I have a life, friends, family, and an internet connection. I can observe the world just as well as you with your bondage fetish. We are equal observers of the world, but it's only natural that we have differing opinions.

Afflicted... Never been called that before. I'll have to put that in my notebook.

Nihil novi sub sole. I'm not making that up, claustrophilia is an entirely real fetish (rule 34b: Everything is somebody's fetish). And it's related to bondage. By your own argument, you should check it out with a professional's help. For all you know, your fetish for submission and self-restriction could expand to horrible self harm, due to lessening feelings of self-worth from being trodden over constantly and willingly. Although, locking yourself in a box and suffocating is a pretty extreme thing. Just about as extreme as hunting down and eating someone. And of course you would never do something so extreme, because that would be ridiculous and totally outside your character. So perhaps your argument is invalid. If not, get thee to a physician.

Monoochrom said:
Of course not. I haven't been trying to state anything other then that. What I have been stating is that nobody can know how exactly they will live with it over time. Reason enough to talk to a professional, even if just to find out where it is coming from, it's not about being healed or something, it's about understanding it instead of shrugging when the question of ''Why?'' comes up. Like I said, I like being tied to the bed from time to time and I know why. Do you have much of a clue as to why you like this? And I don't mean the feeling it gives you, indulgence is not the answer to this question.
Why? I already sort of answered that in an earlier post, but I'll elaborate. What interests me in sex is the idea of the body working like a well-oiled, squishy machine. I love the thought of each organ doing its own part in a step-by-step process. It's so base and primal and natural. That's the foundation of all my turn-ons. Vore satisfies that because it's about getting closer and exploring more of those organs all doing their functions all around you. Death and murder doesn't factor into it anywhere. Fluids and squishiness do. I look at a girl having sex, and think about what the guy's doing inside her, the biological processes going on. That's just how my brain is wired. I naturally analyze things. I like to look at how things work, and it makes me feel satisfied. It's my dominant inner scientist.

Also, vore, due to its inherently illogical nature, is an absolute sandbox for ignoring countless laws of biology, anatomy, sociology, chemistry, physics, thermodynamics, theoretical astrophysics, and dentistry. You can take all the liberties you want with the character's body, which makes my interest in anatomy varied and interesting.

Monoochrom said:
Who's paranoid?
Ahem. See your quote:

Monoochrom said:
And personally I believe that most people have the potential to jump off the deep end given the right circumstances. So who's to say that any given Vora will really stay happy with the fantasy?
...

Monoochrom said:
The deal is, in which precise situation can I possibly become a danger to someone else based on the idea of me liking being tied? Unless we are talking some extremly stupid hypothectical situation, like holding somebody up at gunpoint so they'll do it, that isn't happening. Probably won't anything happen with any of you, you're are all probably fairly normal. The difference is that there however is a potential with ''you'' because your fetish is inseperable from violence.
It is entirely separable from violence. You just obviously haven't read any.

(I could point out some good lit if you want an example. Or hundreds. XD)

Monoochrom said:
In other words, it would be far more likely then with most other fetishes, sure, only the mega looney is going to go through with it. But people aren't just born insane. It's something that happens. And personally I believe that most people have the potential to jump off the deep end given the right circumstances. So who's to say that any given Vora will really stay happy with the fantasy?
Try the countless vores who've led perfectly normal uneventful lives.

And people do get born insane. Sociopaths are just built that way. They can't help it. And hell, even sociopaths won't necessarily go out and become a serial killer. They're capable of leading relatively normal lives even with no social skills or empathy to speak of. But here, you're talking about vores, totally normal people with a fetish that has no bearing on lifestyle.

Monoochrom said:
It's not like they're going to look like cannibals. And for the record, I'm not worried about this, perhaps if it actually were common I would be, but then I would have to make sure nobody is standig behind me with a knife and fork. It's Forum, Forums are for discussing, Thread was posted, I responded honestly. That's just what I do.
I can relate. That's what I do as well.

Monoochrom said:
I can find you weird without actually being worried about you, that's just a sentiment to say ''maybe you shouldn't just be shrugging this off...it's not exactly your ''standard'' fetish, more like far out, extremly weird shit...which, if you aren't into it, should probably come across as atleast slightly alarming''.
No fetish is standard. I guarantee you that there is no single thing that every single person likes. And "should" or "shouldn't" does not factor in when appraising a person. Should or shouldn't automatically means by definition that you're projecting your ideas onto someone else. Thus, your appraisal is inherently skewed.

Monoochrom said:
Not worried about you being a vora, if anything I'm worried that you and so many others apparently think nothing of it. That's not the real world, if the real world worked like that I could go outside and do my shopping in my underwear because it's comfortable and nobody would bat a eye. So I seriously don't understand why online suddenly everybody is okay with everything. Bunch of damned hypocrites :p
If you're not worried about me being a vore, why do you think we should make a big deal out of it? Because if you're not worried about me turning into Hannibal (which would be a self contradiction if true, given your second response and the quote I used in my fourth response), then there's no reason to think anything of it.

You'll notice the people who acted accepting in this thread were the people who listened to the explanations. We think nothing of it, because the Hannibals are not anywhere even close to the majority. It's a harmless little quirk (yes, quirk as in peculiar behavorial habit) for your own personal happy time. Nothing more.

Did you know bondage is my number one turn-off? It's up there with rape. Just sayin'.
 

Ironic Pirate

New member
May 21, 2009
5,544
0
0
Sorry about the delay, folks.

Reaper69lol said:
Do you ever regret having this fetish? Or perhaps a little bit ashamed?
Not really. It's sort of hard to regret something you can't imagine being without, and it hasn't really negatively impacted me.

the spud said:
Are you open about your fetish in real life or do you keep it a secret?

So basically, have you come out of the closet?
I haven't really told anyone, but I don't do much more to hide it then I would regular porn.

tunderball said:
Ok I am dying to ask a few questions and please don't take any of these the wrong way as I am genuinely fascinated.

1. How did you discover this about yourself, its not something you'd encounter much in everyday life, did you read the story of Zeus's brothers being swallowed by their father or something?
2. Do you have a GF and if so would you or have you discussed this with her? what does she think/ how do people normally react?
3. Do you get turned on eating jelly babies?
I discovered it though a cracked article about weird fetishes, although stories like that had always fascinated me.

I don't have a girl friend, and I haven't really told anyone IRL.

Girl With One Eye said:
This thread reminds me of new vegas, inside the ultra luxe casino.

Anyway, my question is...if you had a relationship with someone, would it be important that they are also into vore? And is it something you would find easy to talk about?
Not really. I mean, it'd be kick-ass if they were, but it's not necessary. I'd have to imagine that at some point in a relationship it'd be easy to talk about (certainly if it was part of a "tell each other our fetishes" thing), but it's not first date material.

Monoochrom said:
Ok...I know we live in this age of toleration and everything and to be honest, I tolerate you existing and having this fetish...but...what the fuck dude?

Sure you can't do anything about it, but you have to admit, this is deeply disturbing. I would suggest looking for psychiatric help, but neither do I think such help really exists...nor do I believe that I would be spared of the thousands of the tolerance army coming down upon me.

So, all I can really say is, good luck.

Oh and in case this hasn't been asked yet:

So, do you have normal sex? You've been kind of straight forward with the premise of it being more a arousal then a actual sexual act. So, do you have sex? Homosexual? Heterosexual? Bisexual? Or are you Asexual?
Well, I wouldn't actually eat anyone, so I doubt I need counseling. The actual cannibals are the problem, us theoretical ones don't pose a threat.

Anyway, yes. I would have normal sex, vore would only really amount to role play.

Ben Jackson said:
Wow, this is new to me, only ones I knew about where fetishes about feet,big people,little people,and animation.

So, do you have a partner, if you do, do they know about this and what do they feel about it?
Sadly, I don't have a partner. I would at some point tell them about this if I did.

MordinSolus said:
How do you have sex normally? Do you like, nibble on your partner's hands/feet/head/area between legs?
Most likely, I'd either have regular sex or role play a bit and then have regular sex. There isn't really a special position or anything.

n00beffect said:
O~kay... That was a fresh peace of information there (no pun intended). Let's see... Okay, I've got one: How exactly do you 'fulfill' or 'execute' your urges and fantasies and what not? Do you go around eating people, or do you... I don't know, make little action figures of all the peopke you know, and eat one a day? Weird. On that note, I guess I am a 'pray' thing since I like to be eaten. Get it? I like it when girls EAT ME (out). See? See what I did there? No? Okay!
Usually, with role-play or drawings. I imagine an action figure would be a choking hazard.

Chamale said:
The normals are curious now. What's the portal?
At risk of moderation, it's part of the name of a vore website. I'm not sure what constitutes linking pornography, so I don't want to say the full name. But it's basically just a vore site, with forums and such.

zHellas said:
My Question: Do different objects and/or creatures give off different levels of pleasure for you? Like for example, "eating" a man is pretty good, but "eating" a car or a Reese's Peanut Butter Cup is like a godsend for your masturbation session?
I guess I don't quite follow. Voraphilia is pretty much about eating people, object and food swallowing is a different (albeit related) thing entirely.

Doitpow said:
Is there any good 'vore' pornography?

Ha vorenography if you will
Live action? No, because the special effects are above an beyond the budget of most porn, and it's too obscure to get anything high quality. There's a fair amount of quality drawings and stories, though.

IsraelRocks said:
When you hang out with your fellow Voraphiles (?) do you play fuck/date/marry/eat?
Mostly just talk, although there is a large role play community.

alouicia said:
Does vore afford you any sexual gratification?
Yes. Some people just like it conceptually though, it isn't sexy to them.

David Demers said:
I can guess those acronyms, and my favorite is CV, but that's a whole different topic altogether.
My question: Are you a furry? I have yet to met a voraphile who wasn't a furry.
Not really, although I've learned to appreciate some furry stuff. When a good portion of the vore material involves furries, you get used to it. Furries themselves aren't a fetish of mine, however.

Callate said:
If you envision swallowing your "prey" whole, how does that work (especially as you mentioned preferring your prey remain their normal size)? Do you envision unhinging your jaw like a snake, or are you some kind of giant monster in your fantasies, or... Does it just somehow happen without explanation?
Personally, I go for the unhinged jaw angle. Other people like shrinking, or magic, or growing, or transformation...

If you can imagine a way for someone to be eaten, it's a vore sub fetish.

DeathWyrmNexus said:
OT: Is the correlation simply possession of the subject, subsummation of the subject, or simply the pleasure of the feast for you? (MY dinner, I will have you inside me as part of me, or Food is nummy)
It's a bit of both. Some people are entirely about domination, but I'm sort of a mix. I also like the feeling of being a predator.
 

Ironic Pirate

New member
May 21, 2009
5,544
0
0
AugustFall said:
What I don't get it is where the pleasure comes from. Like, excuse the banality, but what do you fuck? Like every other fetish, foot, furry, whatever deals with actually having sex with the object of said fetish.

Like what do you actually get off to in this fetish? Where does the sex part come in? God it sounds odd to ask that.
Vore on it's own is appealing, sex doesn't have to be involved, and vore doesn't have to be involved with sex. If sex comes into a vore RP, it's for the sake of sex, not because it's necessary. Does any of that make sense? It's early in the morning here.

glowbug3 said:
Do you still find other fetishes weird and strange or are you more accepting because you have an unusual fetish yourself?
I find them strange, but I'm also accepting. Example, people ejaculating on your face. I don't find that appealing, and it's objectively weird. And yet, I don't judge any fans of that, because mine is debatably weirder.

Kpt._Rob said:
My apologies, your response was fine, it was actually more a case of the fact that at the time I responded to that post, you had not yet responded. Which is understandable considering how many people you were responding to.

Either way, I must admit that I find your claim that there isn't a sexual component to vore somewhat questionable. While I myself am far from a strict Freudian, and would disagree with Freud's claim that every element of human psychology relates to sex, I do think that it's hard to say something like this (especially considering that you call it a "fetish") has no sexual elements.

Vore isn't my thing (though I'm sure I have a few habits people would be shocked to learn of myself), that said, I have been around the internet long enough to have stumbled across a couple of vore pictures in my time, and I was familiar with it long before this thread. And while it may be that the pictures I've seen were not representative of vore as a whole, those I've seen have almost all been very explicitly sexualized, even when the figures involved were clothed.

Whether my own reading of the subconscious elements of vore is correct or not, I would be willing to bet my bank account that there are deeper sexual roots to the fetish than those who indulge in it might want to admit.
I must have made myself misunderstood. Vore is definitely sexual, it just doesn't quite correlate to sex, for me at least. For some people, vore pairings are the same as sexual pairings, if they're a straight guy they'll want a girl pred/prey. For me, the prey can be either gender, even though I only consider myself attracted to one.

I suppose it could mean that I'm subconsciously bisexual, or something.


dark-mortality said:
Anyway, I have some questions:
1) As far as you know, does the Vore community, or Vore people in general prefer a gender, or are they pretty much Bisexual?
2) Aside from Furry, is Vore linked towards some other fetishes/Fantasies?
3) This has most likely been asked/said before, but how do you visualice yourself 'swallowing' people? Is it like a snake, cracking open your jaw to a ridiculous size, are you yourself a giant, or does it just happen? And when it comes to after the swallowing, what do you do?
4) You say you are a predator, then I must ask what type of prey are your favorite? Do you also know what type of prey is the favorite of the 'general' Vore community?

Excuse my terrible English, I am not English, so it's most likely some/alot of mistakes there. Do nag at me if you find any.
Nah, you're english was fine. Better than some native speakers...

Anyway,
1) I'll go for either, but that's unusual. Most people prefer the same pairings they like in regular sex, effectively making vore a form of sex.

2) Yeah, there's weight gain, inflation, giants, nagas (which might count as furries). Really any fetish can be, if someone likes amputees he might make amputee prey, or such like that.

3) Myself, I imagine a large jaw opening (still not large enough to do it realistically) and the rest is sort of looked over. The esophagus is not big enough to fit a person, but I just pretend it can stretch. But really, any way you can imagine to eat someone, there's vore of it.

4) My favorite prey is willing, and if female the kind of girl I would consider attractive. If male, I don't really mind what they look like. In the general community, it's just what's considered normally attractive, if that makes sense. Most vores want to eat/be eaten by someone that they are attracted to.

dark-mortality said:
Thank you for the answers :) Now, one last questions that I just remembered. What do you think about the stories, the real stories, about a person actually eating another person.
For example, this case: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/2569095.stm
¨
I know it says "Cannibalism" ,but you can also think of it as Vore. Now, what do you think about cases like that? Are they generally accepted, or do cases like that give the general Vore crowd a bad name? Err... let me ask in another way. Do the general Vore person accept that, or do they think that it's disgusting to actually DO it, and that it gives the Vore community a bad name?
Yeah, most vores think of cases like that as unhinged psychos. A while back, there was a video of someone eating... mice, I think. Most people thought it was disgusting and horrible, and the thread was deleted. That sort of thing is viewed as bad.

Generic Gamer said:
Actually, serious question for the OP: I know a few people who live a fetish 'lifestyle' and I've always considered it extremely weird and possibly mentally damaged, do you allow your fetish to intrude on your daily life or do you restrict it to sexy time?
There isn't really a vore life-style, at least not that I'm aware of. So no, not really.
 

Weir DeWolfe

New member
Aug 16, 2011
5
0
0
OP, what is the foundation or basis for your fetish? Like, what brain function triggers the sexiness when you see someone being swallowed?
 

Scabious

New member
May 6, 2011
17
0
0
Scabious said:
I am a macrophile. That means I am sexually attracted to giants, more specificly female giants, giantesses. Many like a violent, downright cruel giantess, but I like almost specificly kindness. Not that there is anything wrong with the majority, which is violent. I have no problem with the vore community but one. Whenever I look up the commen keywords, "Gentle Giantess" I always get plenty of vore. Vore writers and artist, writers espiecially, always start, tag, or throw in as a plot device "gentle giantess". Many of us complain, but there are so many vorophiles and not as many "gentle" fans. Have you ever even heard of this problem? Many haven't, so I was just wondering if you have, and if you agree with me.
I do have sympathy, but I haven't heard of the exact thing. Is there a tag exclusion feature on whatever site you're using?

I use various sites, and I sometimes just use a search engine, but when I do have a tag exclusion, somtimes the vore isn't even metioned, though this is admittedly less common.
 

Ironic Pirate

New member
May 21, 2009
5,544
0
0
Weir DeWolfe said:
OP, what is the foundation or basis for your fetish? Like, what brain function triggers the sexiness when you see someone being swallowed?

I guess I don't follow. Do you mean what specific part of my brain causes arousal? I have no idea.

Scabious said:
Scabious said:
I am a macrophile. That means I am sexually attracted to giants, more specificly female giants, giantesses. Many like a violent, downright cruel giantess, but I like almost specificly kindness. Not that there is anything wrong with the majority, which is violent. I have no problem with the vore community but one. Whenever I look up the commen keywords, "Gentle Giantess" I always get plenty of vore. Vore writers and artist, writers espiecially, always start, tag, or throw in as a plot device "gentle giantess". Many of us complain, but there are so many vorophiles and not as many "gentle" fans. Have you ever even heard of this problem? Many haven't, so I was just wondering if you have, and if you agree with me.
I do have sympathy, but I haven't heard of the exact thing. Is there a tag exclusion feature on whatever site you're using?

I use various sites, and I sometimes just use a search engine, but when I do have a tag exclusion, somtimes the vore isn't even metioned, though this is admittedly less common.
Ah, that would suck. There aren't any giantess only sites without vore?
 

Scabious

New member
May 6, 2011
17
0
0
Scabious said:
Scabious said:
I am a macrophile. That means I am sexually attracted to giants, more specificly female giants, giantesses. Many like a violent, downright cruel giantess, but I like almost specificly kindness. Not that there is anything wrong with the majority, which is violent. I have no problem with the vore community but one. Whenever I look up the commen keywords, "Gentle Giantess" I always get plenty of vore. Vore writers and artist, writers espiecially, always start, tag, or throw in as a plot device "gentle giantess". Many of us complain, but there are so many vorophiles and not as many "gentle" fans. Have you ever even heard of this problem? Many haven't, so I was just wondering if you have, and if you agree with me.
I do have sympathy, but I haven't heard of the exact thing. Is there a tag exclusion feature on whatever site you're using?

I use various sites, and I sometimes just use a search engine, but when I do have a tag exclusion, somtimes the vore isn't even metioned, though this is admittedly less common.
Ah, that would suck. There aren't any giantess only sites without vore?[/quote]

If they don't have vore, it's somthing else violent, or something involving a specific part of the body (foot), which I typicly find rather boring. "Gentle" fans are, in my own words, a minority inside a minority. Sometimes I feel lik it's supposed to be a stepping stone between "normal person without fetish" and violence. It's like a gate-way drug, and if you're only doing that you're not welcome to the good writing on the vore side. If that's sensible.