Assassin's Creed Devs Don't Hate the British

Recommended Videos

Purple Dragon

New member
Dec 19, 2010
83
0
0
as an british person i'd like to point we weren't "the bad guys" as the article puts it

firstly,while i totally agree the colonists deserved representation so did many in parliament the leader of the opposition in Britain at the time attended parliament IN REVOLUTIONARY UNIFORM as a statement of his support for their cause

secondly taxes had just gone down, the boston tea party was organised by smugglers standing to lose out from cheaper tea, that's right the brits had made tea CHEAPER

thirdly, a big reason for the rebellion was anger at the government not allowing westward expansion, i.e. war with the indians later leading to genocide and destruction of culture
 

dudycat1

New member
Dec 16, 2010
66
0
0
considering this war took place about 300 years ago most British people (me included) won't care. although quite a few of the southern states only joined the rebellion so that could keep slavery as the British at that time where going to abolish it. there wasn't an outcry about empire total war's tutorial making you kill the British so i don't see why there should be one here.
 

Jack and Calumon

Digimon are cool.
Dec 29, 2008
4,190
0
41
Rogue 09 said:
Jack and Calumon said:
Ordinarily, I would see this as nothing different as killing the English crusaders in Assassin's Creed 1. In the country for dickish reasons because Britain, as everyone knows, is the bad guy of the world because we did so many bad things in the past. That's why we make the best movie villains, because British people are naturally evil. I have accepted that once my face hair sorts itself out I will be twirling my moustache as I feed another servant to my pet piranhas.

However, Conor isn't a colonist, nor totally British. He's a Native American. He's someone who lived originally here and his people and way of living were destroyed by the colonists, through disease, cheating, pillaging and raping. This was not a good guys versus bad guys war, this was a bad guys vs even badder guys war. All I ask is that Conor at least spends 5 minutes looking at the side he is fighting on and says "Jesus christ guys, what the fuck?" and maybe assassinates one.

Really, yes, that's what I want. I want Conor to kill at least one blue coat. Just one, then I'll be happy. You kill a single man in a blue coat (who is not in disguise, no cheating) and then I will be totally satisfied. I don't care if the mainstream media in America may see it as controversial that you kill one of the people who fought for independence in their great country, I want you to have the balls to say "They weren't all that good" and dirty your blade with someone tangibly responsible. Do it and I will never ever make any jokes about the connection of the French and cowardice.

I mean it.

Calumon: Please do, he won't be quiet otherwise. >.<
Get off of it. The Indians were a bunch of savages who were not strong enough (or united enough) to keep more evolved peoples from taking their stuff. Boo-Hoo, get over it. Every conquering nation from Britain to Rome to country on the freaking planet. The worst part of this is that you think that they got cheated out of anything. We wanted land, they wanted beads. Something is worth only what you are willing to take for it. Whether I spend $1 or $100 for a Dr. Pepper, I will only pay for it if I think that it's worth it. They weren't exactly given nothing by the way. How about all those nice shiny guns they got? A technical marvel they were several THOUSAND years from achieving. The weak are overtaken by the strong, which is how it is supposed to work. If they are really so in tune with nature and how life works, this would be a perfectly understandable concept.

In response to the article, no one ever thinks of the German kids to had to spend several years killing their virtual ancestors.
Okay then, gonna go through this point by point.

1. You specifically use the term "Indians" despite pretty much everyone else in the comments using the correct term "Native Americans". We're not Columbus' men, we know that America is not actually India now, so there's no need to think that as it is a factually wrong statement.

2. You assume that I want Conor to kill a single blue coat because of personal objections, and not because of the sense of betrayal that one could imagine that Conor would feel from those that brutalised his ancestors. Most of your points think that I am objecting to this on a personal note, but as I said in my post, the fact that Conor is part Native American should make him at least bitter at what the colonists did to his people.

3. Is there really a need to insult the Native Americans? They had a rather proud way of living, and quite a lot of them were peaceful most of the time. Sure they had battles amongst each other and did sometimes skin people's scalps, but we in our "civilised" world weren't much better, having greater wars and torturing and dehumanising people in cruel and unusual ways (See Spanish Inquisition and Vlad the Impaler).

4. In response to your response to the article, did you just compare the British in the game to the Nazis? The Nazis were ridiculously evil, and no-one, besides Neo-Nazis, will say so otherwise. Not a single person. Germany doesn't like to acknowledge the Nazi regime, which is why any game with reference to Nazis in Germany is either banned or is censored so that not a reference exists within the game (So German kids aren't killing all their ancestors, point is moot). The British in this era were not even close to the evil and cruelness of the Nazi regime, and thus are incomparable.

Thank you, and good day sir.

Calumon: What if we made a game where we make our own history and people just make friends because no-one really wants to hurt each other...

Right?
 

TheFederation

New member
Mar 29, 2011
205
0
0
i don't know, being british, to be offended by the fact we're always villains or accepting. because i think the reason we are the villain all the time is because people presume that we're smarter or something. at least that is what I heart...
 

dayjack01

New member
Aug 19, 2010
61
0
0
Im pretty sure they said that connor is killing everyone not just the british though they seem to be focusing on the british getting killed in reality connor is going to be killing any templar not just the british or americans
 

Innegativeion

Positively Neutral!
Feb 18, 2011
1,636
0
0
Amnestic said:
Innegativeion said:
You expected a sequel to game where you could share a bro-hug with leonardo da vinci that is set in revolution-era America to

NOT

have you exchange dialogue with George Washington?
Exchanging dialogue is one thing. Riding casually on horseback surrounded by a retinue of Colonialists is another.
Not really.

Where else would you be speaking to George Washington in the midst of the revolution?

An out house?
 

Jammy2003

New member
Feb 28, 2011
93
0
0
Brit here. I was already a little disappointed with the choice of the American Civil War as the time period, (I mean, I guess it makes sense as a big event in history, but of ANY time period you could pick in history? I just consider the ACW a bit dull...) so was unsure if I was going to buy this or not. Until it was pointed out that it historically made no sense for a Native American to side with the Colonists, that Washington is meant to be a Templar from previous stuff, and the whole American flag waving in the background thing, it didn't even occur to me I would be killing the british and that I might be offended in some way.

If it makes sense for the protagonist to side against us, then go for it. I'm playing as the protagonist, not me, and all wars have two sides. The british have done a lot of crap in the past, not gonna hide from that.

Guess I'm more disappointed than offended though... It just feels like a bit of a let down that it's gone the easy route to make America happy, even at the cost of it making sense. But if they do do some kind of plot twist then I'm more than prepared to take that back, and give the game it's due.

Still dunno if I'll buy it though, but only because of the period choice, not because of killing british soldiers.
 

Ledan

New member
Apr 15, 2009
798
0
0
But they weren't really the bad guys.....
The americans were just entitled and crazy.

Brits: So, we know we usually dont tax you very much at all.
Americans: Yup. S'nice.
Britts: But we recently saved your ass in the recent war vs the french.
A: yup.
B: And it cost quite a bit of money.
A: wars usually do....
B: So were going to increase taxes.
A: No! You evil bastards! No taxation without representation!
B: what the? We usually dont tax you at all!!!

Also: Brits were much nicer to the native americans than the colonialists... still not very nice.
 

almostgold

New member
Dec 1, 2009
729
0
0
Well of course. To represent an oppressive imperial power as being bad guys wouldn't make at sense at all...
 

Amnestic

High Priest of Haruhi
Aug 22, 2008
8,946
0
0
Innegativeion said:
Amnestic said:
Innegativeion said:
You expected a sequel to game where you could share a bro-hug with leonardo da vinci that is set in revolution-era America to

NOT

have you exchange dialogue with George Washington?
Exchanging dialogue is one thing. Riding casually on horseback surrounded by a retinue of Colonialists is another.
Not really.

Where else would you be speaking to George Washington in the midst of the revolution?

An out house?
Somewhere which doesn't make it look like you're best-buds? Even just getting rid of his retinue would go a long way.

Remember this is promotional stuff. If they want to play up the "both sides are bad, vote Assassins" bit then why not give some more indication of that instead of having us buddy-bud with Washington and stab nothing but Redcoats?

And once again: The game may be different, but why not show that beforehand?
 

Malty Milk Whistle

New member
Oct 29, 2011
617
0
0
heheheh....I actually cannot wait for the internet arguments containing the words "Hypocritical"
"Ignorant" and my old favorite "Amerifag/britard"

Such joy.

OT: Meh, we're good at being villains, but I will get slightly annoyed if there is to much "'MERICA F-YEH" going on without a healthy dollop of self cynicism to back it up.
 

Malty Milk Whistle

New member
Oct 29, 2011
617
0
0
Jack and Calumon" post="7.378411.14803880 said:
Calumon: What if we made a game where we make our own history and people just make friends because no-one really wants to hurt each other...

Right?

Oh dear go I'm in love.
Calumon, Can i have huggles?
 

WanderingFool

New member
Apr 9, 2009
3,991
0
0
Midgeamoo said:
John Funk said:
To be fair, though, you were kind of the bad guys.
Whats that? I can't hear you over the sound of my puppy fueled death ray making its hourly shot at cute endangered species.
Dude, you have one of those too?

OT: Im hoping we have Templar agents on the American side, it would be pretty bland if there wasnt.
 

spartandude

New member
Nov 24, 2009
2,721
0
0
Mcoffey said:
Also just as an aside, wasn't George Washington a Templar in the Assassin's Creed Lore? In 2 wasn't there a glyph showing him with a Piece of Eden crossing the Delaware?

this is true

tbh im not annoyed that its Britain as the bad guys, im just annoyed that so far its seems one nation= bad and the other = good. and that so far its exclusively the British being the templars and not any of the americans
especially as the assassin said in the gameplay footage "let the patriots fight their own battles, I'm here for the templar" but it seems so far to just be the brits


im still dissapointed we didnt get French Revolution or maybe Napoleon
 

scotth266

Wait when did I get a sub
Jan 10, 2009
5,202
0
0
Amnestic said:

That's a picture of our AC3 Assassin riding horseback with George Washington.

Not about Britain vs. Colonies. Totally you guys.
Considering that Washington is likely the head of the Assassins (one of the previous games set him as possessing the Apple, so he's either that or a high Templar) it's not surprising to see him being a major player in the game.

However, that doesn't mean it's going to be a purely Brit-slaughter. There's plenty of room for a storyline where the Templars are both trying to fan the flames of war and also insinuate themselves into the brand-new America. Early America was full of traitors, cowards, skulks and genuinely bad dudes ripe for the stabbing.

For example: you might have to do a mission where Washington actually has you assassinate one of his subordinates, who he discovered is a Templar plant. This doubles the necessity of stealth, because Connor won't want to kill people he is technically allied to.
 

Risingblade

New member
Mar 15, 2010
2,893
0
0
I thought the French were suppose to be the whiny ones not the British...oh well you learn something new everyday.
 

WanderingFool

New member
Apr 9, 2009
3,991
0
0
scotth266 said:
Amnestic said:

That's a picture of our AC3 Assassin riding horseback with George Washington.

Not about Britain vs. Colonies. Totally you guys.
Considering that Washington is likely the head of the Assassins (one of the previous games set him as possessing the Apple, so he's either that or a high Templar) it's not surprising to see him being a major player in the game.

However, that doesn't mean it's going to be a purely Brit-slaughter. There's plenty of room for a storyline where the Templars are both trying to fan the flames of war and also insinuate themselves into the brand-new America. Early America was full of traitors, cowards, skulks and genuinely bad dudes ripe for the stabbing.

For example: you might have to do a mission where Washington actually has you assassinate one of his subordinates, who he discovered is a Templar plant. This doubles the necessity of stealth, because Connor won't want to kill people he is technically allied to.
Consider the there were several founding fathers that were part of the Freemasons, whos to say the freemasons arent part of the Templar. Hell, thinking about it, a nation succeding from another, with no real government set in place... wouldnt it make sense that a number of the Templars will be on the American side?

Maybe it would be cliched, seeing as it was already done in AC1, but I would like to find out at some point near the end game that some of the Templar are actually the guys that have been giving you orders, for their generally dick-ish purpose.